Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Filipa Cardoso, Mário J Costa, Paulo Colaço, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, João C Pinho, David B Pyne, Ricardo J Fernandes
{"title":"Ventilatory and Perceived Ergogenic Effects of Mandibular Forward Repositioning During Running at Maximal Oxygen Uptake Intensity.","authors":"Filipa Cardoso, Mário J Costa, Paulo Colaço, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, João C Pinho, David B Pyne, Ricardo J Fernandes","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000004953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Cardoso, F, Costa, MJ, Colaço, P, Vilas-Boas, JP, Pinho, JC, Pyne, DB, and Fernandes, RJ. Ventilatory and perceived ergogenic effects of mandibular forward repositioning during running at maximal oxygen uptake intensity. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Wearing an intraoral dental splint may enhance ventilatory function and exercise performance. Nineteen runners performed on a 400-m outdoor track: (a) an incremental protocol to assess the velocity at maximal oxygen uptake (vV̇o2max) and (b) 2 square wave bouts wearing 2 intraoral splints (with and without mandibular forward repositioning). The time until exhaustion at vV̇o2max (TLimv V̇o2max), ventilatory variables, oxygen uptake (V̇o2) kinetics, energetic profiling, perceived exertion and kinematics, were all measured. Ventilatory data were assessed breath-by-breath and perceived exertion evaluated using the Borg 6-20-point scale at the end of TLimv V̇o2max bouts. Images were recorded by video cameras (120 Hz) and kinematic measures retrieved using Kinovea. A paired t test was computed for comparison of splints (p ≤ 0.05). With (vs. without) mandibular forward repositioning, runners increased their TLimv V̇o2max by ∼6% (p = 0.03), coupled with higher ventilation (151 ± 22 vs. 147 ± 23 L·min-1, p = 0.04), end-tidal oxygen tension (114.3 ± 3.7 vs. 112.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg, p = 0.003), and lower inspiratory time (0.526 ± 0.083 vs. 0.540 ± 0.090 seconds, p = 0.02), despite similar V̇o2 kinetics (e.g., 49.0 ± 8.7 vs. 47.7 ± 8.6 ml∙kg∙min-1 of fast component amplitude) being observed. The energy expenditure was ∼8% higher (p = 0.03) with the mandible forward, coupled with lower perceived exertion scores (p = 0.04). Mandibular forward repositioning was effective in acutely improving running performance at vV̇o2max with ergogenic effects on ventilatory and perceived variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004953","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Cardoso, F, Costa, MJ, Colaço, P, Vilas-Boas, JP, Pinho, JC, Pyne, DB, and Fernandes, RJ. Ventilatory and perceived ergogenic effects of mandibular forward repositioning during running at maximal oxygen uptake intensity. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2024-Wearing an intraoral dental splint may enhance ventilatory function and exercise performance. Nineteen runners performed on a 400-m outdoor track: (a) an incremental protocol to assess the velocity at maximal oxygen uptake (vV̇o2max) and (b) 2 square wave bouts wearing 2 intraoral splints (with and without mandibular forward repositioning). The time until exhaustion at vV̇o2max (TLimv V̇o2max), ventilatory variables, oxygen uptake (V̇o2) kinetics, energetic profiling, perceived exertion and kinematics, were all measured. Ventilatory data were assessed breath-by-breath and perceived exertion evaluated using the Borg 6-20-point scale at the end of TLimv V̇o2max bouts. Images were recorded by video cameras (120 Hz) and kinematic measures retrieved using Kinovea. A paired t test was computed for comparison of splints (p ≤ 0.05). With (vs. without) mandibular forward repositioning, runners increased their TLimv V̇o2max by ∼6% (p = 0.03), coupled with higher ventilation (151 ± 22 vs. 147 ± 23 L·min-1, p = 0.04), end-tidal oxygen tension (114.3 ± 3.7 vs. 112.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg, p = 0.003), and lower inspiratory time (0.526 ± 0.083 vs. 0.540 ± 0.090 seconds, p = 0.02), despite similar V̇o2 kinetics (e.g., 49.0 ± 8.7 vs. 47.7 ± 8.6 ml∙kg∙min-1 of fast component amplitude) being observed. The energy expenditure was ∼8% higher (p = 0.03) with the mandible forward, coupled with lower perceived exertion scores (p = 0.04). Mandibular forward repositioning was effective in acutely improving running performance at vV̇o2max with ergogenic effects on ventilatory and perceived variables.

在最大摄氧量强度下跑步时,下颌前移对通气和认知致能的影响。
摘要: Cardoso, F, Costa, MJ, Colaço, P, Vilas-Boas, JP, Pinho, JC, Pyne, DB, and Fernandes, RJ.以最大摄氧量强度跑步时下颌前移的通气效果和人体工程学感知效果。J Strength Cond Res XX(X):000-000,2024-佩戴口内牙科夹板可增强通气功能和运动表现。19 名跑步者在 400 米室外跑道上进行了以下运动:(a) 采用增量方案评估最大摄氧量(vV̇o2max)时的速度;(b) 佩戴 2 种口内夹板(使用或不使用下颌前移夹板)进行 2 次方波运动。对达到最大运动量(TLimv V.J.o.2max)时的耗竭时间、通气变量、摄氧量(V.J.o.2)动力学、能量曲线、感觉用力和运动学进行了测量。在 TLimv V̇o2max 运动结束时,逐次评估通气数据,并使用博格 6-20 分量表评估体力消耗情况。通过摄像机(120 Hz)记录图像,并使用 Kinovea 检索运动测量数据。夹板比较采用配对 t 检验(P ≤ 0.05)。使用(与不使用)下颌前移夹板时,跑步者的 TLimv V̇o2max 增加了 6%(p = 0.03),同时通气量增加(151 ± 22 vs. 147 ± 23 L-min-1,p = 0.04)、潮气末氧张力(114.3 ± 3.7 vs. 112.9 ± 3.9 mm Hg,p = 0.003)和较低的吸气时间(0.526 ± 0.083 vs. 0.540 ± 0.090 秒,p = 0.02),尽管 V̇o2 动力学相似(例如:49.0 ± 8.7 vs. 49.0 ± 8.7 mm Hg,p = 0.003)、49.0 ± 8.7 vs. 47.7 ± 8.6 ml∙kg∙min-1 的快速成分振幅)。下颌前移时,能量消耗高出 8%(p = 0.03),同时体力消耗评分较低(p = 0.04)。下颌骨前移能有效改善vVo2max时的跑步成绩,对通气和感知变量有促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信