The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Diabetes in Adult African Americans and Whites: An NHANES Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alula Hadgu, Fengxia Yan, Robert Mayberry
{"title":"The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Diabetes in Adult African Americans and Whites: An NHANES Study.","authors":"Alula Hadgu, Fengxia Yan, Robert Mayberry","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02144-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the association between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and diabetes and see if this association is the same for adult (age ≥ 20) African Americans (AAs) and Whites. The secondary objective is to examine the distribution of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test among AAs and Whites and to evaluate the appropriateness of using the same cut-off point for both groups to diagnose VDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our analysis is based on the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). We used two common propensity score adjustment methods to analyze the data-propensity score matching (PSM) and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of diabetes for AAs and Whites was 12.27% (95% CI, 10.47-14.07%) and 7.24% (95% CI, 6.35-8.13%), respectively. The prevalence of VDD for AAs and Whites was 65.29% (95% CI, 62.01-68.58%) and 19.49% (95% CI, 16.53-22.45%), respectively. Under PSM, the odds ratios for the diabetes-VDD association for AAs and Whites were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.70-1.27) and 2.16 (95% CI, 1.49-3.13), respectively. Under IPTW, the VDD-diabetes odds ratios for AAs and Whites were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10) and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.67-3.30), respectively. Our results further demonstrate that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements are significantly different for AAs and Whites across the general population, as well as the vitamin D-sufficient and vitamin D-deficient populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of VDD and diabetes was higher for AAs compared to Whites. However, VDD was associated with increased diabetes risk for Whites but not for AAs. Though more research is needed to explain why this is the case, a reason for this may be that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test or its associated cut-off point for defining VDD may not accurately reflect the vitamin D status among AAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02144-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the association between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and diabetes and see if this association is the same for adult (age ≥ 20) African Americans (AAs) and Whites. The secondary objective is to examine the distribution of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test among AAs and Whites and to evaluate the appropriateness of using the same cut-off point for both groups to diagnose VDD.

Methods: Our analysis is based on the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). We used two common propensity score adjustment methods to analyze the data-propensity score matching (PSM) and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Results: The prevalence of diabetes for AAs and Whites was 12.27% (95% CI, 10.47-14.07%) and 7.24% (95% CI, 6.35-8.13%), respectively. The prevalence of VDD for AAs and Whites was 65.29% (95% CI, 62.01-68.58%) and 19.49% (95% CI, 16.53-22.45%), respectively. Under PSM, the odds ratios for the diabetes-VDD association for AAs and Whites were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.70-1.27) and 2.16 (95% CI, 1.49-3.13), respectively. Under IPTW, the VDD-diabetes odds ratios for AAs and Whites were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10) and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.67-3.30), respectively. Our results further demonstrate that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements are significantly different for AAs and Whites across the general population, as well as the vitamin D-sufficient and vitamin D-deficient populations.

Conclusion: The prevalence of VDD and diabetes was higher for AAs compared to Whites. However, VDD was associated with increased diabetes risk for Whites but not for AAs. Though more research is needed to explain why this is the case, a reason for this may be that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test or its associated cut-off point for defining VDD may not accurately reflect the vitamin D status among AAs.

成年非裔美国人和白人维生素 D 缺乏与糖尿病之间的关系:一项 NHANES 研究。
研究目的这项横断面研究的主要目的是调查维生素 D 缺乏症(VDD)与糖尿病之间的关系,并了解成年(年龄≥20 岁)非裔美国人(AAs)与白人之间的关系是否相同。次要目标是研究25-羟基维生素D测试在非裔美国人和白人中的分布情况,并评估在两个群体中使用相同的临界点诊断VDD是否合适:我们的分析基于 2011-2014 年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)。我们使用了两种常见的倾向得分调整方法来分析数据--倾向得分匹配法(PSM)和反向治疗概率加权法(IPTW):结果:AA 和白人的糖尿病患病率分别为 12.27% (95% CI, 10.47-14.07%) 和 7.24% (95% CI, 6.35-8.13%)。AAs 和白人的 VDD 患病率分别为 65.29% (95% CI, 62.01-68.58%) 和 19.49% (95% CI, 16.53-22.45%)。在 PSM 条件下,AA 和白人的糖尿病与VDD 关联的几率比分别为 0.94(95% CI,0.70-1.27)和 2.16(95% CI,1.49-3.13)。在 IPTW 条件下,AA 人和白人的 VDD-糖尿病几率比分别为 0.83(95% CI,0.64-1.10)和 2.35(95% CI,1.67-3.30)。我们的研究结果进一步表明,在普通人群、维生素 D 充足人群和维生素 D 缺乏人群中,AA 族人和白人的 25- 羟维生素 D 测量值存在显著差异:结论:与白人相比,亚裔美国人的维生素 D 缺乏症和糖尿病发病率更高。然而,对于白人而言,VDD 与糖尿病风险的增加有关,而对于亚裔美国人则无关。虽然还需要更多的研究来解释为什么会出现这种情况,但其中一个原因可能是 25- 羟维生素 D 测试或其相关的用于定义 VDD 的临界点可能无法准确反映 AA 人的维生素 D 状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信