Trends and Disparities in Mental Health Use Among Asian American Sub-groups, 2013-2019.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frederick Q Lu, Michael W Flores, Nicholas J Carson, Thomas Le, Benjamin Lê Cook
{"title":"Trends and Disparities in Mental Health Use Among Asian American Sub-groups, 2013-2019.","authors":"Frederick Q Lu, Michael W Flores, Nicholas J Carson, Thomas Le, Benjamin Lê Cook","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02177-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to characterize and compare national estimates of mental healthcare use among White and Asian American groups to provide an update using post Affordable Care Act data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed yearly cross-sectional data from the 2013-2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, including White (n = 112,590) and Asian American (n = 10,210) individuals, and examined rates of mental healthcare use for Asian (overall), Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, and Other Asian individuals relative to White individuals. Using multivariable logistic regression models and predictive margin methods, we estimated overall Asian disparities and Asian subgroup disparities compared to White group rates in mental health care (outpatient, specialty, psychotropic medication) among adults with and without elevated risk for mental illness. Regression models were adjusted for variables related to need for treatment, demographic, and socioeconomic status variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Asian individuals had lower rates of mental healthcare use than White individuals. Unadjusted results and adjusted regression model predictions are consistent in identifying wide disparities in mental health care treatment across risk for mental illness, Asian subgroups, and types of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Asian Americans have significantly lower rates of mental healthcare use than White Americans, even among those with elevated risk for mental illness. There is small variation by Asian subgroups but disparities persist across subgroups and types of treatment. Our results imply interventions are needed to improve linguistically, culturally, and ethnically tailored outreach and engagement in treatment services, as well as examining treatment and its effectiveness for Asian American individuals living with psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02177-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize and compare national estimates of mental healthcare use among White and Asian American groups to provide an update using post Affordable Care Act data.

Methods: We analyzed yearly cross-sectional data from the 2013-2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, including White (n = 112,590) and Asian American (n = 10,210) individuals, and examined rates of mental healthcare use for Asian (overall), Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, and Other Asian individuals relative to White individuals. Using multivariable logistic regression models and predictive margin methods, we estimated overall Asian disparities and Asian subgroup disparities compared to White group rates in mental health care (outpatient, specialty, psychotropic medication) among adults with and without elevated risk for mental illness. Regression models were adjusted for variables related to need for treatment, demographic, and socioeconomic status variables.

Results: Asian individuals had lower rates of mental healthcare use than White individuals. Unadjusted results and adjusted regression model predictions are consistent in identifying wide disparities in mental health care treatment across risk for mental illness, Asian subgroups, and types of treatment.

Conclusions: Asian Americans have significantly lower rates of mental healthcare use than White Americans, even among those with elevated risk for mental illness. There is small variation by Asian subgroups but disparities persist across subgroups and types of treatment. Our results imply interventions are needed to improve linguistically, culturally, and ethnically tailored outreach and engagement in treatment services, as well as examining treatment and its effectiveness for Asian American individuals living with psychological distress.

2013-2019 年亚裔美国人次群体中心理健康使用的趋势和差异。
目的:本研究的目的是利用《平价医疗法案》颁布后的数据,对全国白人和亚裔美国人群体的精神医疗使用情况进行描述和比较:本研究的目的是利用《平价医疗法案》颁布后的数据,对全国白人和亚裔美国人群体的精神卫生保健使用情况进行特征描述和比较,以提供最新数据:我们分析了 2013-2019 年医疗支出小组调查(Medical Expenditure Panel Survey)的年度横截面数据,包括白人(n = 112,590 人)和亚裔美国人(n = 10,210 人),并研究了亚裔(整体)、亚裔印度人、华人、菲律宾人和其他亚裔相对于白人的心理保健使用率。通过使用多变量逻辑回归模型和预测差值方法,我们估算出了与白人群体相比,亚裔在精神健康护理(门诊、专科、精神药物治疗)方面的总体差距和亚裔亚群体差距。回归模型对与治疗需求、人口统计学和社会经济地位相关的变量进行了调整:结果:与白人相比,亚裔使用精神医疗服务的比例较低。未经调整的结果和调整后的回归模型预测结果一致,都表明在不同的精神疾病风险、亚裔亚群和治疗类型中,精神保健治疗存在着巨大差异:结论:亚裔美国人使用精神医疗服务的比例明显低于白人美国人,即使在那些精神疾病风险较高的人群中也是如此。亚裔亚群之间的差异很小,但不同亚群和治疗类型之间的差异依然存在。我们的研究结果表明,需要采取干预措施来改善语言、文化和种族方面的外联工作和参与治疗服务的情况,并对亚裔美国人心理困扰的治疗及其有效性进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信