Evaluation of biocompatibility and osseointegration of multi-component TiAl6V4 titanium alloy implants

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Zaina Jacobs, Rossana Schipani, Maria Pastrama, Seyed Mohammad Ahmadi, Banafsheh Sajadi
{"title":"Evaluation of biocompatibility and osseointegration of multi-component TiAl6V4 titanium alloy implants","authors":"Zaina Jacobs,&nbsp;Rossana Schipani,&nbsp;Maria Pastrama,&nbsp;Seyed Mohammad Ahmadi,&nbsp;Banafsheh Sajadi","doi":"10.1002/jor.25974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to investigate the biocompatibility and osseointegration of novel titanium (Ti) implants with a perforated part with high surface roughness (Ra &gt;4 μm) and a smooth solid part (test group), as compared to smooth solid Ti implants (control group; Ra &lt; 0.8 μm). Test and control implants were implanted in rabbit femurs. After 4 and 15 weeks, host tissue reaction and quality of tissue formed were evaluated with histopathology, while micro-CT scans were used to quantitatively assess bone–implant contact (BIC), surrounding bone formation, and bone ingrowth.</p><p>After 4 and 15 weeks, minimal host reaction was found in the test group. Histopathological analysis showed new bone formation around the implants in both the test and control groups after 4 weeks. Furthermore, additional bone growth was often observed within the holes of the test implants. After 15 weeks, the test implants showed high bone ingrowth and the presence of mature bone in direct contact with the implant surface, whereas, bone ingrowth was poorer for the control group with 30% of the control implants, showing larger gaps at the bone–implant interface. Quantitative micro-CT analysis revealed comparable BIC and bone formation in both groups at 4 weeks, but higher BIC and more bone formation in the test group than in the control group after 15 weeks. No significant differences were observed in any of the analyses. In conclusion, partially perforated, high-roughness Ti implants showed excellent osseointegration and minimal host reaction, indicating their potential for orthopedic applications in bone repair and regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"43 1","pages":"139-152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.25974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the biocompatibility and osseointegration of novel titanium (Ti) implants with a perforated part with high surface roughness (Ra >4 μm) and a smooth solid part (test group), as compared to smooth solid Ti implants (control group; Ra < 0.8 μm). Test and control implants were implanted in rabbit femurs. After 4 and 15 weeks, host tissue reaction and quality of tissue formed were evaluated with histopathology, while micro-CT scans were used to quantitatively assess bone–implant contact (BIC), surrounding bone formation, and bone ingrowth.

After 4 and 15 weeks, minimal host reaction was found in the test group. Histopathological analysis showed new bone formation around the implants in both the test and control groups after 4 weeks. Furthermore, additional bone growth was often observed within the holes of the test implants. After 15 weeks, the test implants showed high bone ingrowth and the presence of mature bone in direct contact with the implant surface, whereas, bone ingrowth was poorer for the control group with 30% of the control implants, showing larger gaps at the bone–implant interface. Quantitative micro-CT analysis revealed comparable BIC and bone formation in both groups at 4 weeks, but higher BIC and more bone formation in the test group than in the control group after 15 weeks. No significant differences were observed in any of the analyses. In conclusion, partially perforated, high-roughness Ti implants showed excellent osseointegration and minimal host reaction, indicating their potential for orthopedic applications in bone repair and regeneration.

评估多组分 TiAl6V4 钛合金植入体的生物相容性和骨整合性。
本研究旨在研究表面粗糙度较高(Ra > 4 μm)的穿孔部分和光滑的实心部分(试验组)与光滑的实心钛(Ti)植入物(对照组;Ra > 4 μm)相比,新型钛(Ti)植入物的生物相容性和骨整合性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信