Efficacy of subperiosteal drains in chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective randomized single-center study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yavor Bozhkov, Julian Feulner, Michael Buchfelder, Max Kleiss, Sebastian Brandner, Thomas M M Kinfe
{"title":"Efficacy of subperiosteal drains in chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective randomized single-center study.","authors":"Yavor Bozhkov, Julian Feulner, Michael Buchfelder, Max Kleiss, Sebastian Brandner, Thomas M M Kinfe","doi":"10.1055/a-2418-3682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are most frequently treated by evacuation via a burr-hole craniostomy procedure. Subperiosteal drains have been introduced as alternatives to subdural ones but only a few prospective studies have explored their efficacy. Thus, a prospective randomized trial was designed to assess their use. Methods The study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed surgically amenable cSDH. These patients were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent cSDH evacuation via a single burr-hole craniostomy procedure followed by placement of a subperiosteal drain; the second group underwent the identical procedure without drain placement. Patient demographics, drain volumes, duration of drainage, cSDH recurrence, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Results Eighty-eight patients presenting with cSDH (12 with bilateral findings) from a total of 100 surgical cases were enrolled. Nine patients (1 bilateral) were lost to follow-up. Of all remaining 90 procedures, 37 were carried out with drain placement and the remaining 53 without. There were 5 recurrent cases (13,5%) in the drain group and 17 (32,1%) in the control group without drain placement. This resulted in a statistical significance (OR 0.33; p<0.05) favoring the use of a drain. Conclusion Subperiosteal drain placement can be used safely and effectively to treat cSDH in conjunction with a burr-hole craniostomy procedure, significantly reducing the rate of recurrence without any additional disadvantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2418-3682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) are most frequently treated by evacuation via a burr-hole craniostomy procedure. Subperiosteal drains have been introduced as alternatives to subdural ones but only a few prospective studies have explored their efficacy. Thus, a prospective randomized trial was designed to assess their use. Methods The study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed surgically amenable cSDH. These patients were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent cSDH evacuation via a single burr-hole craniostomy procedure followed by placement of a subperiosteal drain; the second group underwent the identical procedure without drain placement. Patient demographics, drain volumes, duration of drainage, cSDH recurrence, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Results Eighty-eight patients presenting with cSDH (12 with bilateral findings) from a total of 100 surgical cases were enrolled. Nine patients (1 bilateral) were lost to follow-up. Of all remaining 90 procedures, 37 were carried out with drain placement and the remaining 53 without. There were 5 recurrent cases (13,5%) in the drain group and 17 (32,1%) in the control group without drain placement. This resulted in a statistical significance (OR 0.33; p<0.05) favoring the use of a drain. Conclusion Subperiosteal drain placement can be used safely and effectively to treat cSDH in conjunction with a burr-hole craniostomy procedure, significantly reducing the rate of recurrence without any additional disadvantages.

骨膜下引流管对慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效:一项前瞻性随机单中心研究。
背景 慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)最常用的治疗方法是通过钻孔开颅手术进行排空。骨膜下引流管作为硬膜下引流管的替代品已经问世,但只有少数前瞻性研究对其疗效进行了探讨。因此,我们设计了一项前瞻性随机试验来评估其使用情况。方法 该研究招募了新诊断为可手术治疗的 cSDH 患者。这些患者被随机分为两组。第一组患者通过单个毛刺孔开颅手术进行 cSDH 排空,然后放置骨膜下引流管;第二组患者进行相同的手术,但不放置引流管。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、引流管容量、引流持续时间、cSDH复发情况和术后效果。结果 在总共 100 例手术中,有 88 例 cSDH 患者(12 例为双侧)入选。9 名患者(1 名双侧)失去了随访机会。在剩余的 90 例手术中,37 例植入了引流管,其余 53 例未植入引流管。放置引流管组有5例复发病例(13.5%),未放置引流管的对照组有17例复发病例(32.1%)。这在统计学上有显著意义(OR 0.33; p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信