American Football Headgear Impairs Visuomotor Drill Performance in Division I NCAA Football Athletes.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Christopher G Ballmann, Rebecca R Rogers
{"title":"American Football Headgear Impairs Visuomotor Drill Performance in Division I NCAA Football Athletes.","authors":"Christopher G Ballmann, Rebecca R Rogers","doi":"10.3390/jfmk9030169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Previous evidence has shown that American football headgear (e.g., facemasks, visors/eye shields) differentially impairs reaction time (RT) to visual stimuli, most notably in peripheral fields of view. However, this has only been established with stationary RT testing, which may not translate to gameplay situations that require gross motor skills. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to build upon previous findings to elucidate the effects of various American football headgear on gross motor visuomotor drill performance. <b>Methods:</b> Division 1 NCAA football players (n = 16) with normal/corrected-to-normal vision participated and completed two experiments (EXP), each with differing conditions: EXP1- Varying facemask reinforcement and EXP2- Varying visor/eye shield light transmittance. In EXP1, participants completed an agility test for the following conditions: baseline/no helmet (BL), helmet + light (HL), helmet + medium (HM), and helmet + heavy (HH) face mask reinforcement. In EXP2, participants completed an agility test for the following conditions: baseline/no helmet (BL), helmet + clear visor (HCV), helmet + smoke-tinted visor (HSV), and helmet + mirrored visor (HMV). For each condition in EXP1 and EXP2, participants completed a reactive agility task using a FITLIGHT trainer system where five poles were equipped with a total of ten LED sensors and were placed in a semi-circle 1 m around a center point. Participants were asked to step and reach with their hands to hit each ten lights individually as fast as possible upon illumination. Each reactive agility test was repeated for a total of three attempts. <b>Results:</b> Average reaction time was analyzed and compared between conditions and according to visual fields of interest (e.g., central vs. peripheral). Results from EXP1 showed that compared to BL, reactive agility was worsened by HL (<i>p</i> = 0.030), HM (<i>p</i> = 0.034), and HH (<i>p</i> = 0.003) conditions. No differences between facemask conditions existed for overall performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). For EXP2, HCV (<i>p</i> < 0.001), HSV (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and HMV (<i>p</i> < 0.001) conditions resulted in worsened reactive agility performance compared to BL. No differences between visor conditions existed for overall performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Overall, these findings suggest that American football headgear impairs reactive agility, which could result in worsened game performance and safety. Future studies investigating training strategies to overcome impairments are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9030169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Previous evidence has shown that American football headgear (e.g., facemasks, visors/eye shields) differentially impairs reaction time (RT) to visual stimuli, most notably in peripheral fields of view. However, this has only been established with stationary RT testing, which may not translate to gameplay situations that require gross motor skills. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to build upon previous findings to elucidate the effects of various American football headgear on gross motor visuomotor drill performance. Methods: Division 1 NCAA football players (n = 16) with normal/corrected-to-normal vision participated and completed two experiments (EXP), each with differing conditions: EXP1- Varying facemask reinforcement and EXP2- Varying visor/eye shield light transmittance. In EXP1, participants completed an agility test for the following conditions: baseline/no helmet (BL), helmet + light (HL), helmet + medium (HM), and helmet + heavy (HH) face mask reinforcement. In EXP2, participants completed an agility test for the following conditions: baseline/no helmet (BL), helmet + clear visor (HCV), helmet + smoke-tinted visor (HSV), and helmet + mirrored visor (HMV). For each condition in EXP1 and EXP2, participants completed a reactive agility task using a FITLIGHT trainer system where five poles were equipped with a total of ten LED sensors and were placed in a semi-circle 1 m around a center point. Participants were asked to step and reach with their hands to hit each ten lights individually as fast as possible upon illumination. Each reactive agility test was repeated for a total of three attempts. Results: Average reaction time was analyzed and compared between conditions and according to visual fields of interest (e.g., central vs. peripheral). Results from EXP1 showed that compared to BL, reactive agility was worsened by HL (p = 0.030), HM (p = 0.034), and HH (p = 0.003) conditions. No differences between facemask conditions existed for overall performance (p > 0.05). For EXP2, HCV (p < 0.001), HSV (p < 0.001), and HMV (p < 0.001) conditions resulted in worsened reactive agility performance compared to BL. No differences between visor conditions existed for overall performance (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Overall, these findings suggest that American football headgear impairs reactive agility, which could result in worsened game performance and safety. Future studies investigating training strategies to overcome impairments are warranted.

美式橄榄球头盔会影响美国大学生体育协会橄榄球一级联赛运动员的视觉运动训练成绩。
背景/目的:以往的证据表明,美式橄榄球头饰(如面罩、面罩/眼罩)会对视觉刺激的反应时间(RT)造成不同程度的影响,尤其是在周边视野中。然而,这只在静态反应时间测试中得到证实,可能无法转化为需要粗大运动技能的游戏情况。因此,本研究的目的是在之前研究结果的基础上,阐明各种美式橄榄球头套对粗大运动视觉运动训练成绩的影响。研究方法视力正常/矫正视力正常的美国大学生体育协会一级橄榄球运动员(n = 16)参加并完成了两项实验(EXP),每项实验的条件各不相同:EXP1- 不同的面罩强化和 EXP2- 不同的面罩/眼罩透光率。在 EXP1 中,参与者在以下条件下完成了敏捷性测试:基本/无头盔(BL)、头盔+轻型(HL)、头盔+中型(HM)和头盔+重型(HH)面罩强化。在 EXP2 中,参与者在以下条件下完成敏捷性测试:基准/无头盔(BL)、头盔+透明面罩(HCV)、头盔+烟色面罩(HSV)和头盔+镜面面罩(HMV)。在 EXP1 和 EXP2 中的每个条件下,参与者使用 FITLIGHT 训练器系统完成反应敏捷任务,在该系统中,五根电线杆上装有共十个 LED 传感器,并围绕中心点呈 1 米半圆形放置。参与者被要求在灯光亮起时以最快的速度迈步并用手分别击中十个灯。每次反应敏捷性测试重复进行,共进行三次尝试。测试结果对平均反应时间进行了分析,并根据不同的条件和感兴趣的视野(如中心视野和周边视野)进行了比较。EXP1 的结果显示,与 BL 相比,HL(p = 0.030)、HM(p = 0.034)和 HH(p = 0.003)条件下的反应敏捷性更差。不同面罩条件下的总体表现不存在差异(p > 0.05)。就 EXP2 而言,与 BL 相比,HCV(p < 0.001)、HSV(p < 0.001)和 HMV(p < 0.001)条件导致反应敏捷性能下降。不同遮阳板条件下的总体表现不存在差异(p > 0.05)。结论:总之,这些研究结果表明,美式橄榄球头盔会影响反应敏捷性,从而导致比赛成绩和安全性下降。今后有必要对克服障碍的训练策略进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信