Maomao Zhao, Xiaowei Niu, Lu Bai, Zixian Chen, Jing Zhao, Fengmei Chen, Yinchang Zhang, Na Yang, Ming Bai
{"title":"Application of Myocardial Salvage Index as a Clinical Endpoint: Assessment Methods and Future Prospects.","authors":"Maomao Zhao, Xiaowei Niu, Lu Bai, Zixian Chen, Jing Zhao, Fengmei Chen, Yinchang Zhang, Na Yang, Ming Bai","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), traditional clinical endpoints used to assess drug efficacy and prognosis include infarct size (IS), incidence of heart failure, and mortality rates. Although these metrics are commonly employed to evaluate outcomes in AMI patients, their utility is limited in small-scale studies. The introduction of the myocardial salvage index (MSI) reduces variability in assessments across multiple dimensions, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of outcome measures and reducing the required sample size. Moreover, MSI is increasingly utilized to evaluate drug efficacy, prognosis, and risk stratification in AMI patients. Although a variety of methodologies for measuring the MSI are currently available, the incorporation of these methods as clinical endpoints remains limited. In the clinical application of cardioprotective strategies, it is recommended that MSI be evaluated using late gadolinium enhancement measured along the endocardial surface length combined with IS in cardiac magnetic resonance. In dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography, an assessment of MSI using methods based on abnormalities in myocardial wall thickening combined with perfusion anomalies is advocated. This review comprehensively outlines the principles, advantages, and limitations of different MSI assessment methods and discusses the prospects and challenges of MSI in cardiac protective therapies. Additionally, we summarize recommended strategies for employing MSI as a clinical surrogate endpoint in various clinical scenarios, providing direction for future clinical practice and research. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), traditional clinical endpoints used to assess drug efficacy and prognosis include infarct size (IS), incidence of heart failure, and mortality rates. Although these metrics are commonly employed to evaluate outcomes in AMI patients, their utility is limited in small-scale studies. The introduction of the myocardial salvage index (MSI) reduces variability in assessments across multiple dimensions, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of outcome measures and reducing the required sample size. Moreover, MSI is increasingly utilized to evaluate drug efficacy, prognosis, and risk stratification in AMI patients. Although a variety of methodologies for measuring the MSI are currently available, the incorporation of these methods as clinical endpoints remains limited. In the clinical application of cardioprotective strategies, it is recommended that MSI be evaluated using late gadolinium enhancement measured along the endocardial surface length combined with IS in cardiac magnetic resonance. In dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography, an assessment of MSI using methods based on abnormalities in myocardial wall thickening combined with perfusion anomalies is advocated. This review comprehensively outlines the principles, advantages, and limitations of different MSI assessment methods and discusses the prospects and challenges of MSI in cardiac protective therapies. Additionally, we summarize recommended strategies for employing MSI as a clinical surrogate endpoint in various clinical scenarios, providing direction for future clinical practice and research. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.