Evaluation of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, rifampicin and isoniazid resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria in a low-incidence setting.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1128/jcm.00402-24
Bruno Luukinen, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Silja Mentula, Anu Pätäri-Sampo
{"title":"Evaluation of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays for the detection of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>, rifampicin and isoniazid resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria in a low-incidence setting.","authors":"Bruno Luukinen, Janne Aittoniemi, Terhi Miikkulainen-Lahti, Silja Mentula, Anu Pätäri-Sampo","doi":"10.1128/jcm.00402-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid detection is crucial for tuberculosis (TB) control. GeneXpert (Cepheid) is a widely used PCR system, known for its simplicity, random access, and point-of-care compatibility. SD BIOSENSOR recently introduced a similar system, STANDARD M10, including a <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid resistance (herein, MDR-TB) assay and an MTB/nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) assay. We evaluated these assays for the potential to replace the established Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay in a low-TB incidence setting. We analyzed 160 clinical respiratory samples (45 MTB-positive and 35 NTM-positive) and further 24 drug-resistant MTB, 30 mycobacterial species (2 MTB, 28 NTM), and 37 non-mycobacterial isolates. Compared with culture, clinical sensitivities and specificities for MTB detection were 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.1-95.6%) and 97.4% (CI = 92.3-99.4%) with Xpert Ultra, 88.9% (95% CI = 76.1-95.6%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MDR-TB, and 84.4% (CI = 70.9-94.4%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MTB/NTM, respectively. For NTM detection, M10 MTB/NTM showed sensitivity and specificity of 65.7% (CI = 49.1-79.2%) and 96.8% (CI = 91.8-99.0%). Compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), sensitivity and specificity for detecting RIF resistance were 100% (CI = 77.3-100%) and 95.6% (CI = 84.4-99.6%) with Xpert Ultra, and 100% (CI = 74.9-100%) and 95.5% (CI = 84.0-99.6%) with M10 MDR-TB. M10 MDR-TB showed 92.3% sensitivity (CI = 74.7-99.0%) and 100% specificity (CI = 87.3-100%) for detecting isoniazid resistance. All discrepancies in DST by PCR were concordant with whole-genome sequencing. While M10 MDR-TB demonstrated great potential as an alternative to Xpert Ultra, M10 MTB/NTM had limitations in NTM screening. Additionally, the M10 sputum pretreatment did not inactivate MTB efficiently, which should be considered in process risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>The molecular diagnostic STANDARD M10 system is highly analogous to the widely established GeneXpert system, which significantly increases the relevance of this evaluation study in the field of rapid detection of <i>M. tuberculosis</i>. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical evaluation describing the performance of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays, including an extensive analytical specificity panel (inclusivity and exclusivity) for the detection of <i>M. tuberculosis</i>, drug resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0040224"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00402-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid detection is crucial for tuberculosis (TB) control. GeneXpert (Cepheid) is a widely used PCR system, known for its simplicity, random access, and point-of-care compatibility. SD BIOSENSOR recently introduced a similar system, STANDARD M10, including a Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid resistance (herein, MDR-TB) assay and an MTB/nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) assay. We evaluated these assays for the potential to replace the established Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay in a low-TB incidence setting. We analyzed 160 clinical respiratory samples (45 MTB-positive and 35 NTM-positive) and further 24 drug-resistant MTB, 30 mycobacterial species (2 MTB, 28 NTM), and 37 non-mycobacterial isolates. Compared with culture, clinical sensitivities and specificities for MTB detection were 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 76.1-95.6%) and 97.4% (CI = 92.3-99.4%) with Xpert Ultra, 88.9% (95% CI = 76.1-95.6%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MDR-TB, and 84.4% (CI = 70.9-94.4%) and 98.3% (CI = 93.5-99.9%) with M10 MTB/NTM, respectively. For NTM detection, M10 MTB/NTM showed sensitivity and specificity of 65.7% (CI = 49.1-79.2%) and 96.8% (CI = 91.8-99.0%). Compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), sensitivity and specificity for detecting RIF resistance were 100% (CI = 77.3-100%) and 95.6% (CI = 84.4-99.6%) with Xpert Ultra, and 100% (CI = 74.9-100%) and 95.5% (CI = 84.0-99.6%) with M10 MDR-TB. M10 MDR-TB showed 92.3% sensitivity (CI = 74.7-99.0%) and 100% specificity (CI = 87.3-100%) for detecting isoniazid resistance. All discrepancies in DST by PCR were concordant with whole-genome sequencing. While M10 MDR-TB demonstrated great potential as an alternative to Xpert Ultra, M10 MTB/NTM had limitations in NTM screening. Additionally, the M10 sputum pretreatment did not inactivate MTB efficiently, which should be considered in process risk assessment.

Importance: The molecular diagnostic STANDARD M10 system is highly analogous to the widely established GeneXpert system, which significantly increases the relevance of this evaluation study in the field of rapid detection of M. tuberculosis. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical evaluation describing the performance of the STANDARD M10 MDR-TB and MTB/NTM assays, including an extensive analytical specificity panel (inclusivity and exclusivity) for the detection of M. tuberculosis, drug resistance, and nontuberculous mycobacteria.

评估 STANDARD M10 MDR-TB 和 MTB/NTM 检测试剂盒在低发病率环境中检测结核分枝杆菌、利福平和异烟肼耐药性以及非结核分枝杆菌的效果。
快速检测对结核病(TB)控制至关重要。GeneXpert(Cepheid)是一种广泛使用的 PCR 系统,以其简便、随机接入和床旁兼容性而著称。SD BIOSENSOR 最近推出了一款类似的系统 STANDARD M10,包括结核分枝杆菌(MTB)、利福平(RIF)和异烟肼耐药性(以下简称 MDR-TB)检测以及 MTB/非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)检测。我们评估了这些检测方法在低结核病发病率环境中取代现有 Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra 检测方法的潜力。我们分析了 160 份临床呼吸道样本(45 份 MTB 阳性,35 份 NTM 阳性),进一步分析了 24 份耐药 MTB、30 份分枝杆菌(2 份 MTB,28 份 NTM)和 37 份非分枝杆菌分离物。与培养法相比,使用 Xpert Ultra 检测 MTB 的临床灵敏度和特异性分别为 88.9%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 76.1-95.6% 和 97.4%(CI = 92.3-99.4%);使用 M10 MDR-TB 的临床灵敏度和特异性分别为 88.9%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 76.1-95.6% 和 98.3%(CI = 93.5-99.9%);使用 M10 MTB/NTM 的临床灵敏度和特异性分别为 84.4%(CI = 70.9-94.4%)和 98.3%(CI = 93.5-99.9%)。在检测 NTM 方面,M10 MTB/NTM 的敏感性和特异性分别为 65.7% (CI = 49.1-79.2%) 和 96.8% (CI = 91.8-99.0%)。与表型药敏试验(DST)相比,Xpert Ultra 检测 RIF 耐药性的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%(CI = 77.3-100%)和 95.6%(CI = 84.4-99.6%),M10 MDR-TB 检测 RIF 耐药性的敏感性和特异性分别为 100%(CI = 74.9-100%)和 95.5%(CI = 84.0-99.6%)。M10 MDR-TB 检测异烟肼耐药性的灵敏度为 92.3%(CI = 74.7-99.0%),特异性为 100%(CI = 87.3-100%)。PCR DST 的所有差异均与全基因组测序一致。虽然 M10 MDR-TB 作为 Xpert Ultra 的替代品表现出了巨大的潜力,但 M10 MTB/NTM 在非结核菌筛查方面仍有局限性。此外,M10 痰液预处理不能有效灭活 MTB,这一点应在流程风险评估中加以考虑:重要意义:分子诊断 STANDARD M10 系统与广泛使用的 GeneXpert 系统高度相似,这大大提高了本评估研究在结核杆菌快速检测领域的相关性。据我们所知,这是首次对 STANDARD M10 MDR-TB 和 MTB/NTM 检测方法的性能进行临床评估,包括检测结核杆菌、耐药性和非结核分枝杆菌的广泛分析特异性面板(包容性和排他性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信