Evaluation of an expanded antibiotic resistance gene panel on prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility results for Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01020-24
Carmila Manuel, Richard Maynard, Synthia Simpkins, Michelle Haro, Romney Humphries
{"title":"Evaluation of an expanded antibiotic resistance gene panel on prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility results for Gram-negative bacteria in blood cultures.","authors":"Carmila Manuel, Richard Maynard, Synthia Simpkins, Michelle Haro, Romney Humphries","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01020-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The QIAstat-Dx BCID Panels (RUO) (\"QIAstat,\" QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) for identification of 13 Gram-negative bacteria and 18 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene groups was evaluated. The study was conducted in two phases; in phase 1, analytical performance was evaluated against 154 challenge isolates against whole genome sequencing data. In this phase, sensitivity and specificity of organism identification calls were 153/154 (99.3%) and 1,748/1,749 (99.8%), respectively. For AMR genes, sensitivity was 434/435 (99.8%) and specificity was 2,334/2,337 (99.9%). One false-negative <i>bla</i><sub>IMP</sub>, one false-positive <i>bla</i><sub>CTX-M</sub>, and two false-positive aac-6'-lb detections were noted in this challenge set of organisms. In phase 2, 101 clinical blood culture isolates of Gram-negative rods were evaluated by the multiplexed PCR versus reference broth microdilution, for the ability of identification combined with AMR genes to predict final susceptibility results. Negative predictive values were 92.8% for ampicillin resistance (100% for <i>Escherichia coli</i>), 93.4% for ceftriaxone, 97.4% for ceftazidime, and 98.7% for cefepime. In constrast, negative predictive values for current standard of care (identification plus detection of <i>bla</i><sub>CTX-M</sub>) ranged from 56.5% to 88.8%. This study demonstrated additive value of additional beta-lactamase genes for bacteria isolated from blood cultures.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prediction of Gram-negative bacteria resistance through detection of resistance genes is complex. This study evaluated a novel, direct-from-blood or bacterial isolate multiplexed PCR for the detection of 17 resistance genes, and evaluated the prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0102024"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01020-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The QIAstat-Dx BCID Panels (RUO) ("QIAstat," QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) for identification of 13 Gram-negative bacteria and 18 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene groups was evaluated. The study was conducted in two phases; in phase 1, analytical performance was evaluated against 154 challenge isolates against whole genome sequencing data. In this phase, sensitivity and specificity of organism identification calls were 153/154 (99.3%) and 1,748/1,749 (99.8%), respectively. For AMR genes, sensitivity was 434/435 (99.8%) and specificity was 2,334/2,337 (99.9%). One false-negative blaIMP, one false-positive blaCTX-M, and two false-positive aac-6'-lb detections were noted in this challenge set of organisms. In phase 2, 101 clinical blood culture isolates of Gram-negative rods were evaluated by the multiplexed PCR versus reference broth microdilution, for the ability of identification combined with AMR genes to predict final susceptibility results. Negative predictive values were 92.8% for ampicillin resistance (100% for Escherichia coli), 93.4% for ceftriaxone, 97.4% for ceftazidime, and 98.7% for cefepime. In constrast, negative predictive values for current standard of care (identification plus detection of blaCTX-M) ranged from 56.5% to 88.8%. This study demonstrated additive value of additional beta-lactamase genes for bacteria isolated from blood cultures.

Importance: Prediction of Gram-negative bacteria resistance through detection of resistance genes is complex. This study evaluated a novel, direct-from-blood or bacterial isolate multiplexed PCR for the detection of 17 resistance genes, and evaluated the prediction of antimicrobial susceptibility.

评估扩展抗生素耐药性基因面板对血液培养物中革兰氏阴性菌抗菌药敏感性结果的预测作用。
对 QIAstat-Dx BCID Panels (RUO)("QIAstat",QIAGEN,德国希尔登)鉴定 13 种革兰氏阴性菌和 18 种抗菌素耐药性 (AMR) 基因组的能力进行了评估。研究分两个阶段进行;在第一阶段,根据全基因组测序数据对 154 个挑战分离物的分析性能进行了评估。在这一阶段,生物识别调用的灵敏度和特异性分别为 153/154(99.3%)和 1,748/1,749 (99.8%)。对于 AMR 基因,灵敏度为 434/435(99.8%),特异性为 2,334/2,337 (99.9%)。在这组挑战生物中,发现了一次 blaIMP 假阴性、一次 blaCTX-M 假阳性和两次 aac-6'-lb 假阳性检测。在第二阶段,通过多重 PCR 与参考肉汤微量稀释法对比,对 101 例临床血液培养分离的革兰氏阴性杆菌进行了评估,以确定结合 AMR 基因进行鉴定以预测最终药敏结果的能力。氨苄西林耐药性的阴性预测值为 92.8%(大肠埃希菌为 100%),头孢曲松为 93.4%,头孢他啶为 97.4%,头孢吡肟为 98.7%。相比之下,现行标准疗法(鉴定加检测 blaCTX-M)的阴性预测值从 56.5% 到 88.8%不等。这项研究证明了额外的β-内酰胺酶基因对从血液培养物中分离出的细菌的附加价值:重要意义:通过检测耐药基因来预测革兰氏阴性细菌的耐药性非常复杂。本研究评估了一种新型的、直接从血液或细菌分离物中检测 17 种耐药基因的多重 PCR,并评估了对抗菌药敏感性的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信