Low placenta at the mid trimester anomaly scan-A cause for concern?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Sarika Yadav, Aditi Shah
{"title":"Low placenta at the mid trimester anomaly scan-A cause for concern?","authors":"Sarika Yadav, Aditi Shah","doi":"10.1002/jcu.23841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was aimed to assess the predictive validity of internal os distance (IOD) in mid-trimester scan for the prediction of third-trimester low-positioned placenta, and to define a cut-off of IOD at which third-trimester low-positioned placenta could be identified, see the association of placental site (anterior/posterior), previous history of cesarean section with abnormal location of placenta in third trimester and see the maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a prospective cohort study of women with low-positioned placenta (IOD < 20 mm) at mid-trimester anomaly scan followed up in third trimester till birth. Relative risks for a low-positioned placenta in the third-trimester were calculated for women with posterior versus anterior, low-lying placenta versus placenta previa and positive versus negative history of cesarean section. Multilevel likelihood ratios and corresponding ROC curves for different ranges of IOD were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with posterior placenta had a high risk of low positioned placenta compared to anterior placenta (9.28% vs. 0.74%); RR 1.45, similarly women with placenta previa had high risk compared to low lying placenta (68.57% vs. 1.69%); RR 6.51, so did the women with previous cesarean section (9.41% vs. 5.87%); RR 1.47.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>93.42% placenta which were low positioned in mid trimester were normally situated in third trimester. The cut-off for IOD in anterior placenta was -40 mm and in posterior placenta was 14.3 mm. IOD measurement and interpretation seems promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was aimed to assess the predictive validity of internal os distance (IOD) in mid-trimester scan for the prediction of third-trimester low-positioned placenta, and to define a cut-off of IOD at which third-trimester low-positioned placenta could be identified, see the association of placental site (anterior/posterior), previous history of cesarean section with abnormal location of placenta in third trimester and see the maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: It was a prospective cohort study of women with low-positioned placenta (IOD < 20 mm) at mid-trimester anomaly scan followed up in third trimester till birth. Relative risks for a low-positioned placenta in the third-trimester were calculated for women with posterior versus anterior, low-lying placenta versus placenta previa and positive versus negative history of cesarean section. Multilevel likelihood ratios and corresponding ROC curves for different ranges of IOD were calculated.

Results: Women with posterior placenta had a high risk of low positioned placenta compared to anterior placenta (9.28% vs. 0.74%); RR 1.45, similarly women with placenta previa had high risk compared to low lying placenta (68.57% vs. 1.69%); RR 6.51, so did the women with previous cesarean section (9.41% vs. 5.87%); RR 1.47.

Conclusions: 93.42% placenta which were low positioned in mid trimester were normally situated in third trimester. The cut-off for IOD in anterior placenta was -40 mm and in posterior placenta was 14.3 mm. IOD measurement and interpretation seems promising.

中期妊娠异常扫描中的低胎盘--值得担忧吗?
研究目的本研究旨在评估妊娠中期扫描中胎盘内口距离(IOD)对预测第三孕期低置胎盘的预测有效性,并确定可识别第三孕期低置胎盘的IOD临界值,了解胎盘部位(前置/后置)、既往剖宫产史与第三孕期胎盘位置异常的相关性,以及孕产妇和新生儿结局:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是胎盘位置过低(IOD 结果)的产妇:与前置胎盘相比,后置胎盘产妇发生低置胎盘的风险较高(9.28% vs. 0.74%);RR为1.45;同样,与低置胎盘相比,前置胎盘产妇发生低置胎盘的风险较高(68.57% vs. 1.69%);RR为6.51;曾行剖宫产的产妇发生低置胎盘的风险也较高(9.41% vs. 5.87%);RR为1.47:93.42%在妊娠中期位置较低的胎盘在妊娠三个月时位置正常。前置胎盘IOD的临界值为-40毫米,后置胎盘为14.3毫米。IOD的测量和解释似乎很有前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信