Diagnostic Value and Safety of Addition of Transbronchial Needle Aspiration to Transbronchial Biopsy Through Endobronchial Ultrasonography Using a Guide Sheath Under Virtual Bronchoscopic Navigation for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions.

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Takayasu Ito, Kazuki Nishida, Shingo Iwano, Shotaro Okachi, Shota Nakamura, Masahiro Morise, Chen Yoshikawa Fengshi Toyofumi, Makoto Ishii
{"title":"Diagnostic Value and Safety of Addition of Transbronchial Needle Aspiration to Transbronchial Biopsy Through Endobronchial Ultrasonography Using a Guide Sheath Under Virtual Bronchoscopic Navigation for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions.","authors":"Takayasu Ito, Kazuki Nishida, Shingo Iwano, Shotaro Okachi, Shota Nakamura, Masahiro Morise, Chen Yoshikawa Fengshi Toyofumi, Makoto Ishii","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) through endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-GS TBB) under virtual bronchoscopic navigation is unsatisfactory because radial EBUS probe is not always located within the lesion. Transbronchial needle aspiration with a guide sheath (GS-TBNA) has the potential to overcome the lower diagnostic yield by improving the relationship between the probe and the lesion and enabling repeated sampling while maintaining the location of a GS near the lesion. However, there are few data regarding the diagnostic yield and safety for diagnosing PPLs in this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive 363 lesions (83 lesions underwent GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB and 280 lesions underwent EBUS-GS TBB) at our institution between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022. We investigated the diagnostic efficacy and complications of GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB and compared them with those of EBUS-GS TBB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lesion size, distance from the hilum, presence of bronchus leading to the lesion, and EBUS images during the examination differed significantly between the two procedures. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for these 4 covariates revealed that GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB was a significant factor affecting the diagnostic success of PPLs compared with EBUS-GS TBB (odds ratio=2.43, 95% CI=1.16-5.07, P=0.018). Neither procedure differed significantly in terms of complications (6.0% vs. 5.7%, P>0.999).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GS-TBNA performed in addition to EBUS-GS TBB might be a promising sampling method for improving the diagnostic yield for PPLs without increasing the incidence of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) through endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-GS TBB) under virtual bronchoscopic navigation is unsatisfactory because radial EBUS probe is not always located within the lesion. Transbronchial needle aspiration with a guide sheath (GS-TBNA) has the potential to overcome the lower diagnostic yield by improving the relationship between the probe and the lesion and enabling repeated sampling while maintaining the location of a GS near the lesion. However, there are few data regarding the diagnostic yield and safety for diagnosing PPLs in this procedure.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive 363 lesions (83 lesions underwent GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB and 280 lesions underwent EBUS-GS TBB) at our institution between April 1, 2019 and March 31, 2022. We investigated the diagnostic efficacy and complications of GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB and compared them with those of EBUS-GS TBB.

Results: The lesion size, distance from the hilum, presence of bronchus leading to the lesion, and EBUS images during the examination differed significantly between the two procedures. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for these 4 covariates revealed that GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB was a significant factor affecting the diagnostic success of PPLs compared with EBUS-GS TBB (odds ratio=2.43, 95% CI=1.16-5.07, P=0.018). Neither procedure differed significantly in terms of complications (6.0% vs. 5.7%, P>0.999).

Conclusion: GS-TBNA performed in addition to EBUS-GS TBB might be a promising sampling method for improving the diagnostic yield for PPLs without increasing the incidence of complications.

在虚拟支气管镜导航下使用导引鞘通过支气管内超声波检查经支气管活检的诊断价值和安全性。
背景:在虚拟支气管镜导航下,通过带导鞘经支气管活检(EBUS-GS TBB)的支气管内超声检查对周围肺部病变(PPLs)的诊断率并不令人满意,因为径向EBUS探头并不总是位于病变内。带导鞘的经支气管针吸术(GS-TBNA)可改善探头与病灶之间的关系,并在保持 GS 位于病灶附近的同时重复取样,从而克服诊断率较低的问题。然而,有关该手术诊断 PPL 的诊断率和安全性的数据却很少:我们回顾性分析了本院在2019年4月1日至2022年3月31日期间连续进行的363个病灶(83个病灶进行了GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB,280个病灶进行了EBUS-GS TBB)。我们研究了GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB的诊断效果和并发症,并与EBUS-GS TBB进行了比较:结果:两种手术的病灶大小、与肺动脉帽的距离、是否存在通向病灶的支气管以及检查过程中的 EBUS 图像均存在显著差异。调整了这4个协变量的逻辑回归分析显示,与EBUS-GS TBB相比,GS-TBNA/EBUS-GS TBB是影响PPL诊断成功率的重要因素(几率比=2.43,95% CI=1.16-5.07,P=0.018)。两种手术在并发症方面均无明显差异(6.0% vs. 5.7%,P>0.999):结论:在EBUS-GS TBB的基础上进行GS-TBNA可能是一种很有前景的取样方法,可在不增加并发症发生率的情况下提高PPL的诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信