Implementation of a Novel Pathway to Integrate Palliative and Oncology Care for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Community Hospital.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Shanthi Sivendran, Caitlyn McNaughton, Avery Briguglio, Jason A Webb, Thomas W LeBlanc, Annamaria Lattanzio-Hale, Michael Horst, Wendy Wilson, Kristina Newport
{"title":"Implementation of a Novel Pathway to Integrate Palliative and Oncology Care for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Community Hospital.","authors":"Shanthi Sivendran, Caitlyn McNaughton, Avery Briguglio, Jason A Webb, Thomas W LeBlanc, Annamaria Lattanzio-Hale, Michael Horst, Wendy Wilson, Kristina Newport","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Historically, patients with hematologic malignancies are referred to palliative care less often and later in the disease trajectory than those with solid tumors. Recent evidence demonstrates the benefit of early, integrated inpatient palliative care (PC) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving chemotherapy at academic centers. The current study evaluated the feasibility of implementing standardized early palliative care services (PCS) during hospitalization for AML treatment in a community setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Starting June 2018, automated consultations for PCS were incorporated into clinical pathways to encourage early, integrated services for patients receiving chemotherapy for AML with an expected hospital stay of 4-6 weeks. Expectations were established that consultations would be performed within 72 hours of request; patients would have two visits per week by a palliative care clinician and at least one visit by a member of the interdisciplinary team. To measure the feasibility of this intervention, data on number of patients who received palliative care consultation and time to palliative care consultation were compared with institutional historical controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the basis of retrospective chart review, the postintervention group (n = 21) had greater PCS compared with historical controls (n = 28; 95% <i>v</i> 36%). The average number of PC team member visits per patient was significantly greater after the intervention: PC clinicians (1.04-8.05, <i>P</i> < .001), chaplains (1.3-3.3, <i>P</i> = .0085), and social workers (1.0-4.3, <i>P</i> < .001). Of those patients who received PCS, 74% had their initial palliative medicine consultation within 3 days of a clinician's order and 100% within 4 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have demonstrated the feasibility of implementing standardized integration of PCS for patients with AML hospitalized for treatment in a community setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400456"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Historically, patients with hematologic malignancies are referred to palliative care less often and later in the disease trajectory than those with solid tumors. Recent evidence demonstrates the benefit of early, integrated inpatient palliative care (PC) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving chemotherapy at academic centers. The current study evaluated the feasibility of implementing standardized early palliative care services (PCS) during hospitalization for AML treatment in a community setting.

Methods: Starting June 2018, automated consultations for PCS were incorporated into clinical pathways to encourage early, integrated services for patients receiving chemotherapy for AML with an expected hospital stay of 4-6 weeks. Expectations were established that consultations would be performed within 72 hours of request; patients would have two visits per week by a palliative care clinician and at least one visit by a member of the interdisciplinary team. To measure the feasibility of this intervention, data on number of patients who received palliative care consultation and time to palliative care consultation were compared with institutional historical controls.

Results: On the basis of retrospective chart review, the postintervention group (n = 21) had greater PCS compared with historical controls (n = 28; 95% v 36%). The average number of PC team member visits per patient was significantly greater after the intervention: PC clinicians (1.04-8.05, P < .001), chaplains (1.3-3.3, P = .0085), and social workers (1.0-4.3, P < .001). Of those patients who received PCS, 74% had their initial palliative medicine consultation within 3 days of a clinician's order and 100% within 4 days.

Conclusion: We have demonstrated the feasibility of implementing standardized integration of PCS for patients with AML hospitalized for treatment in a community setting.

社区医院为急性髓性白血病患者实施姑息治疗与肿瘤治疗相结合的新途径。
目的:与实体瘤患者相比,血液系统恶性肿瘤患者接受姑息治疗的频率和时间历来较晚。最近的证据表明,在学术中心接受化疗的急性髓性白血病(AML)患者早期接受综合住院姑息治疗(PC)是有益的。目前的研究评估了在社区环境中住院治疗急性髓性白血病期间实施标准化早期姑息治疗服务(PCS)的可行性:自2018年6月起,PCS的自动会诊被纳入临床路径,以鼓励为接受急性髓细胞性白血病化疗、预计住院4-6周的患者提供早期综合服务。预计会诊将在患者提出请求后 72 小时内进行;姑息关怀临床医生每周会诊两次,跨学科团队成员至少会诊一次。为了衡量这一干预措施的可行性,我们将接受姑息关怀咨询的患者人数和接受姑息关怀咨询的时间与机构历史对照数据进行了比较:结果:根据回顾性病历审查,干预后组(n = 21)与历史对照组(n = 28; 95% v 36%)相比,姑息关怀咨询率更高。干预后,PC 团队成员对每位患者的平均访问次数明显增加:PC 临床医生(1.04-8.05,P < .001)、牧师(1.3-3.3,P = .0085)和社工(1.0-4.3,P < .001)。在接受 PCS 的患者中,74% 的患者在临床医生下达医嘱后 3 天内接受了首次姑息医学会诊,100% 的患者在 4 天内接受了首次姑息医学会诊:我们证明了在社区环境中对住院治疗的急性髓细胞白血病患者实施标准化整合姑息治疗服务的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信