Development of a Predictive Model for Emergency Department Utilization and Unanticipated Hospital Admission in Patients Receiving Cancer Treatment for Solid Tumor Malignancies.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Catherine H Watson, Brooke Alhanti, Congwen Zhao, Laura J Havrilesky, Brittany A Davidson
{"title":"Development of a Predictive Model for Emergency Department Utilization and Unanticipated Hospital Admission in Patients Receiving Cancer Treatment for Solid Tumor Malignancies.","authors":"Catherine H Watson, Brooke Alhanti, Congwen Zhao, Laura J Havrilesky, Brittany A Davidson","doi":"10.1200/OP.23.00571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Unanticipated health care resource utilization, in the form of either emergency department utilization (EDU) or hospital admission (HA), may be an indicator of lower-quality cancer care. The objective of this study was to develop a predictive model for EDU and HAs within 14 days of receipt of systemic therapy for patients with solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We abstracted electronic health data on oncology encounters from all patients receiving systemic therapy for solid tumors from March 1, 2015, to August 21, 2020, in the Duke University Health System. We defined a primary composite outcome of an EDU or HA within 14 days after the encounter and then developed a predictive model for the primary outcome using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. To evaluate the model, we calculated the area under the receiver operator curve and the calibration slope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve thousand eight hundred ninety unique patients with 134,641 oncology encounters were included. Five thousand one hundred fifty of these patients (40.0%) had at least one EDU or HA within 14 days of at least one treatment. Forty-six variables were incorporated into the final model. The top predictors, in order of absolute value of the predictive coefficients, were temperature, systolic blood pressure, cancer group, and marital status. The model's AUC was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.722 to 0.732), indicating good sensitivity and specificity to outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model developed in this study demonstrated good sensitivity in identifying patients with solid tumors who are at highest risk for EDU or HA and could be implemented in clinical practice to allow for preventive outpatient interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2300571"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.23.00571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Unanticipated health care resource utilization, in the form of either emergency department utilization (EDU) or hospital admission (HA), may be an indicator of lower-quality cancer care. The objective of this study was to develop a predictive model for EDU and HAs within 14 days of receipt of systemic therapy for patients with solid tumors.

Methods: We abstracted electronic health data on oncology encounters from all patients receiving systemic therapy for solid tumors from March 1, 2015, to August 21, 2020, in the Duke University Health System. We defined a primary composite outcome of an EDU or HA within 14 days after the encounter and then developed a predictive model for the primary outcome using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. To evaluate the model, we calculated the area under the receiver operator curve and the calibration slope.

Results: Twelve thousand eight hundred ninety unique patients with 134,641 oncology encounters were included. Five thousand one hundred fifty of these patients (40.0%) had at least one EDU or HA within 14 days of at least one treatment. Forty-six variables were incorporated into the final model. The top predictors, in order of absolute value of the predictive coefficients, were temperature, systolic blood pressure, cancer group, and marital status. The model's AUC was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.722 to 0.732), indicating good sensitivity and specificity to outcome.

Conclusion: The model developed in this study demonstrated good sensitivity in identifying patients with solid tumors who are at highest risk for EDU or HA and could be implemented in clinical practice to allow for preventive outpatient interventions.

针对接受癌症治疗的实体瘤恶性肿瘤患者的急诊室使用率和意外入院率开发预测模型。
目的:以急诊科使用率(EDU)或入院率(HA)形式出现的意外医疗资源使用可能是癌症治疗质量较低的一个指标。本研究的目的是为实体瘤患者在接受系统治疗后 14 天内的 EDU 和 HA 建立一个预测模型:我们抽取了杜克大学医疗系统中所有接受系统治疗的实体瘤患者在 2015 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 21 日期间的肿瘤就诊电子健康数据。我们定义了就诊后 14 天内发生 EDU 或 HA 的主要复合结局,然后使用最小绝对缩减和选择算子回归建立了主要结局预测模型。为了评估模型,我们计算了受体运算曲线下面积和校准斜率:共纳入了 1.289 万名患者,134641 次肿瘤诊疗。其中 515 名患者(40.0%)在至少一次治疗后的 14 天内至少有一次 EDU 或 HA。有 46 个变量被纳入最终模型。按预测系数的绝对值排序,最主要的预测因素是体温、收缩压、癌症组别和婚姻状况。该模型的AUC为0.73(95% CI,0.722至0.732),表明对结果具有良好的敏感性和特异性:本研究建立的模型在识别EDU或HA风险最高的实体瘤患者方面表现出良好的灵敏度,可在临床实践中实施预防性门诊干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信