Clinical diagnostic value of CRISPR-Cas13a-based molecular technology for tuberculosis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Irish Journal of Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s11845-024-03799-y
Kai Wu, Zhenyao Wu, Xiongjie Li
{"title":"Clinical diagnostic value of CRISPR-Cas13a-based molecular technology for tuberculosis.","authors":"Kai Wu, Zhenyao Wu, Xiongjie Li","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03799-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address the clinical diagnostic value of CRISPR-Cas13a-based molecular technology for tuberculosis (TB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 189 suspected TB patients were simultaneously sent for acid-fast staining smear of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, MGIT 960 cultures, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and CRISPR-Cas13a assay. Using the final clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the TB and non-TB groups were determined, and the diagnostic values of the four assays and the combined test in TB were compared. Using MGIT 960 culture as the gold standard, the diagnostic value of CRISPR-Cas13a assay was explored in TB, and the concordance between the CRISPR-Cas13a assay and MGIT 960 culture was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 189 preliminary diagnosed patients with suspected TB were diagnosed, with 147 in the TB group and 42 in the non-TB group. Taking the final clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CRISPR-Cas13a assay, MGIT 960 culture, and XpertMTB/RIF assay were higher than those of acid-fast staining smear; by comparing the area under the ROC curve, the diagnostic value of the CRISPR-Cas13a assay, MGIT 960 culture, and XpertMTB/RIF assay was superior to that of acid-fast staining smear (all P < 0.05). Using the MGIT 960 culture results as the gold standard, there was a moderate concordance between the CRISPR-Cas13a assay and the MGIT 960 culture (kappa = 0.666).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid CRISPR-Cas13a assay has high application value in the clinical diagnosis of TB and can be recommended for the initial screening of patients with suspected TB.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"2889-2895"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03799-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To address the clinical diagnostic value of CRISPR-Cas13a-based molecular technology for tuberculosis (TB).

Methods: The 189 suspected TB patients were simultaneously sent for acid-fast staining smear of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, MGIT 960 cultures, Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and CRISPR-Cas13a assay. Using the final clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the TB and non-TB groups were determined, and the diagnostic values of the four assays and the combined test in TB were compared. Using MGIT 960 culture as the gold standard, the diagnostic value of CRISPR-Cas13a assay was explored in TB, and the concordance between the CRISPR-Cas13a assay and MGIT 960 culture was compared.

Results: The 189 preliminary diagnosed patients with suspected TB were diagnosed, with 147 in the TB group and 42 in the non-TB group. Taking the final clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of CRISPR-Cas13a assay, MGIT 960 culture, and XpertMTB/RIF assay were higher than those of acid-fast staining smear; by comparing the area under the ROC curve, the diagnostic value of the CRISPR-Cas13a assay, MGIT 960 culture, and XpertMTB/RIF assay was superior to that of acid-fast staining smear (all P < 0.05). Using the MGIT 960 culture results as the gold standard, there was a moderate concordance between the CRISPR-Cas13a assay and the MGIT 960 culture (kappa = 0.666).

Conclusion: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid CRISPR-Cas13a assay has high application value in the clinical diagnosis of TB and can be recommended for the initial screening of patients with suspected TB.

基于 CRISPR-Cas13a 分子技术的结核病临床诊断价值。
目的:探讨基于 CRISPR-Cas13a 分子技术的结核病临床诊断价值:探讨基于 CRISPR-Cas13a 分子技术的结核病(TB)临床诊断价值:方法:对 189 名疑似肺结核患者同时进行支气管肺泡灌洗液酸-ast 染色涂片、MGIT 960 培养、Xpert MTB/RIF 检测和 CRISPR-Cas13a 检测。以最终临床诊断为金标准,确定肺结核组和非肺结核组,并比较四种检测方法和联合检测方法对肺结核的诊断价值。以 MGIT 960 培养为金标准,探讨 CRISPR-Cas13a 检测在结核病中的诊断价值,并比较 CRISPR-Cas13a 检测与 MGIT 960 培养的一致性:初步诊断的 189 例疑似肺结核患者中,肺结核组 147 例,非肺结核组 42 例。以最终临床诊断为金标准,CRISPR-Cas13a 检测法、MGIT 960 培养法和 XpertMTB/RIF 检测法的敏感性、阴性预测值和准确性均高于酸-ast 染色涂片检测法;比较 ROC 曲线下面积,CRISPR-Cas13a 检测法、MGIT 960 培养法和 XpertMTB/RIF 检测法的诊断价值均优于酸-ast 染色涂片检测法(均为 P支气管肺泡灌洗液 CRISPR-Cas13a 检测法在结核病的临床诊断中具有较高的应用价值,可推荐用于疑似结核病患者的初步筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信