{"title":"Chaperone in breast examination: a comprehensive systematic review of patient and clinician perspectives, and documentation.","authors":"Kai Qi Ou, Zhen Ning Wong, Zhen Yu Wong","doi":"10.1007/s11845-024-03803-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The General Medical Council (GMC) has made it mandatory to have a chaperone present during intimate examinations, including breast exams, highlighting the importance of medicolegal protection for both patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The use of chaperones during breast examinations is logical, especially in an increasingly litigious society. This review aims to summarize current information regarding patients' and clinicians' perspectives on chaperone use in breast examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted in electronic databases from inception until April 2023 for qualitative literature on patients' and clinicians' perspectives on chaperone use in breast examination. The inclusion criteria focused on studies related to breast examinations, excluding other intimate examinations. An inductive thematic analysis was performed in three domains: physician-associated factors, patient-associated factors, and chaperone documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included after screening 939 articles. For breast examination, the presence of male and older surgeons, nurse availability, rural settings, and patients' psychiatric comorbidities increased the likelihood of chaperone use during consultations. Medico-legal concerns were prominent for male physicians, while female physicians highlighted the need for technical support. Logistical issues were a common hindrance. The gender of physicians was important for patients, but there was conflicting evidence regarding patient preferences for chaperones and their purpose. Poor documentation was generally observed despite quality improvement projects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasizes the vital role of chaperones in clinical practice, urging a precise definition and targeted resolution for implementation challenges. Patient preferences highlight the need for a personalized approach, and increased awareness among healthcare professionals is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"2955-2963"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-024-03803-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The General Medical Council (GMC) has made it mandatory to have a chaperone present during intimate examinations, including breast exams, highlighting the importance of medicolegal protection for both patients and clinicians.
Aims: The use of chaperones during breast examinations is logical, especially in an increasingly litigious society. This review aims to summarize current information regarding patients' and clinicians' perspectives on chaperone use in breast examination.
Methods: A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted in electronic databases from inception until April 2023 for qualitative literature on patients' and clinicians' perspectives on chaperone use in breast examination. The inclusion criteria focused on studies related to breast examinations, excluding other intimate examinations. An inductive thematic analysis was performed in three domains: physician-associated factors, patient-associated factors, and chaperone documentation.
Results: Ten studies were included after screening 939 articles. For breast examination, the presence of male and older surgeons, nurse availability, rural settings, and patients' psychiatric comorbidities increased the likelihood of chaperone use during consultations. Medico-legal concerns were prominent for male physicians, while female physicians highlighted the need for technical support. Logistical issues were a common hindrance. The gender of physicians was important for patients, but there was conflicting evidence regarding patient preferences for chaperones and their purpose. Poor documentation was generally observed despite quality improvement projects.
Conclusion: This study emphasizes the vital role of chaperones in clinical practice, urging a precise definition and targeted resolution for implementation challenges. Patient preferences highlight the need for a personalized approach, and increased awareness among healthcare professionals is essential.
期刊介绍：
The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker.
The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
