Optimizing the hemodynamics of hand injections in neuroangiography.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Esref Alperen Bayraktar, Jiahui Li, Jonathan Cortese, Cem Bilgin, Yasuhito Ueki, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Waleed Brinjikji, Harry J Cloft, David F Kallmes
{"title":"Optimizing the hemodynamics of hand injections in neuroangiography.","authors":"Esref Alperen Bayraktar, Jiahui Li, Jonathan Cortese, Cem Bilgin, Yasuhito Ueki, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Waleed Brinjikji, Harry J Cloft, David F Kallmes","doi":"10.1177/15910199241285944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimizing the preparation of a 10 ml syringe for manual injection of contrast media can help operators obtain easier and faster injections. This study aims to compare the flow rates of different contrast media injection methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Different contrast media solutions were compared: 100% contrast (10 ml contrast), mixed contrast solution (8:2 contrast/saline), and layered contrast below saline (\"Parfait\") in different volumes. Contrast media were injected at room temperature (20°C) and after heating (37°C). Four operators injected 10 ml syringes filled with different mediums through 5-French angiographic catheters. The average flow rate was used to compare different contrast injection mediums. The Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction or Mann-Whitney U-tests were employed depending on the type of comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the 100% contrast solution, every Parfait media and mixed contrast solution demonstrated significantly higher flow rates (p < 0.001). The 5 ml saline Parfait had the highest flow rate among the Parfait solutions. The 5 ml saline Parfait and the mixed solution had comparable flow rates (p = 0.237). Higher flow rates were observed upon heating both 100% contrast (p < 0.001) and mixed contrast solutions (p < 0.001) in comparison to their flow rates at room temperature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the capability of the Parfait and mixed contrast injections to achieve higher flow rates than the 100% contrast solutions. Heating the contrast media to 37°C also proves to be a viable strategy for further enhancing the flow rates for 100% and mixed contrast solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241285944"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241285944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Optimizing the preparation of a 10 ml syringe for manual injection of contrast media can help operators obtain easier and faster injections. This study aims to compare the flow rates of different contrast media injection methods.

Methods: Different contrast media solutions were compared: 100% contrast (10 ml contrast), mixed contrast solution (8:2 contrast/saline), and layered contrast below saline ("Parfait") in different volumes. Contrast media were injected at room temperature (20°C) and after heating (37°C). Four operators injected 10 ml syringes filled with different mediums through 5-French angiographic catheters. The average flow rate was used to compare different contrast injection mediums. The Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction or Mann-Whitney U-tests were employed depending on the type of comparison.

Results: Compared to the 100% contrast solution, every Parfait media and mixed contrast solution demonstrated significantly higher flow rates (p < 0.001). The 5 ml saline Parfait had the highest flow rate among the Parfait solutions. The 5 ml saline Parfait and the mixed solution had comparable flow rates (p = 0.237). Higher flow rates were observed upon heating both 100% contrast (p < 0.001) and mixed contrast solutions (p < 0.001) in comparison to their flow rates at room temperature.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the capability of the Parfait and mixed contrast injections to achieve higher flow rates than the 100% contrast solutions. Heating the contrast media to 37°C also proves to be a viable strategy for further enhancing the flow rates for 100% and mixed contrast solutions.

优化神经血管造影术中手部注射的血液动力学。
目的:优化手动注射造影剂的 10 毫升注射器的准备工作可帮助操作人员更轻松、更快速地完成注射。本研究旨在比较不同造影剂注射方法的流速:方法:比较了不同的造影剂溶液:方法:比较了不同造影剂溶液的流速:100% 造影剂(10 毫升造影剂)、混合造影剂溶液(8:2 造影剂/生理盐水)和生理盐水下面的分层造影剂("Parfait")。造影剂分别在室温(20°C)和加热后(37°C)注入。四名操作员通过 5 法分血管造影导管注入装有不同造影剂的 10 毫升注射器。平均流速用于比较不同的造影剂。根据比较类型,采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和使用 Bonferroni 校正的事后配对比较或 Mann-Whitney U 检验:结果:与 100%造影剂溶液相比,每种 Parfait 培养基和混合造影剂溶液的流速都明显较高(p 结论:Parfait 培养基和混合造影剂溶液的流速均高于 100%造影剂溶液:这项研究表明,与 100%造影剂溶液相比,Parfait 和混合造影剂注射液能获得更高的流速。将造影剂加热到 37°C 也证明是进一步提高 100% 和混合造影剂溶液流速的可行策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信