Pharmacist supply of non-prescription sildenafil in Norway: a simulated patient mixed-method study.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hedda Tvete Syversen, Tonje Krogstad, Hege Sletvold
{"title":"Pharmacist supply of non-prescription sildenafil in Norway: a simulated patient mixed-method study.","authors":"Hedda Tvete Syversen, Tonje Krogstad, Hege Sletvold","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riae053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacist supply of non-prescription sildenafil was initiated in Norway in 2019, and continuous evaluation of the service is warranted.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map how the service checklist is used, evaluate the counselling and information given in consultations, get an insight into pharmacist assessments during consultations, and explore the pharmacists' experiences with the service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method approach of simulated patient visits with feedback combined with qualitative interviews was used. One 24-year-old simulated patient visited pharmacies requesting sildenafil in a scenario that ended before purchase. Visits were audio-recorded and evaluated. Post-visit, pharmacists were invited to get feedback and participate in an audio-recorded interview. Visits, feedback, and interviews were transcribed and analysed by descriptive statistics and systematic text condensation.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Of 39 visits, 26 were analysed and 13 were excluded because the pharmacists did not give consent. Six (23%) pharmacists asked all the checklist questions, while 15 (58%) asked some of them. None of the pharmacists provided all the guideline counselling points. The counselling most provided was 'See your general practitioner within 6 months for a health check' (N = 7, 27%). Interviews (N = 19) elicited that pharmacists assessed the patients, with adaptations in the use of the checklist. Several barriers affecting the service were identified, including time pressure, pharmacist competence, and the task being uncomfortable and challenging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most pharmacists did not completely adhere to the mandatory checklist on non-prescription sildenafil and the counselling and information given were limited. The pharmacy sector must increase awareness of how best to assess and manage patients requesting non-prescription sildenafil.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"470-477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riae053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacist supply of non-prescription sildenafil was initiated in Norway in 2019, and continuous evaluation of the service is warranted.

Objectives: To map how the service checklist is used, evaluate the counselling and information given in consultations, get an insight into pharmacist assessments during consultations, and explore the pharmacists' experiences with the service.

Methods: A mixed-method approach of simulated patient visits with feedback combined with qualitative interviews was used. One 24-year-old simulated patient visited pharmacies requesting sildenafil in a scenario that ended before purchase. Visits were audio-recorded and evaluated. Post-visit, pharmacists were invited to get feedback and participate in an audio-recorded interview. Visits, feedback, and interviews were transcribed and analysed by descriptive statistics and systematic text condensation.

Key findings: Of 39 visits, 26 were analysed and 13 were excluded because the pharmacists did not give consent. Six (23%) pharmacists asked all the checklist questions, while 15 (58%) asked some of them. None of the pharmacists provided all the guideline counselling points. The counselling most provided was 'See your general practitioner within 6 months for a health check' (N = 7, 27%). Interviews (N = 19) elicited that pharmacists assessed the patients, with adaptations in the use of the checklist. Several barriers affecting the service were identified, including time pressure, pharmacist competence, and the task being uncomfortable and challenging.

Conclusions: Most pharmacists did not completely adhere to the mandatory checklist on non-prescription sildenafil and the counselling and information given were limited. The pharmacy sector must increase awareness of how best to assess and manage patients requesting non-prescription sildenafil.

挪威药剂师供应非处方西地那非:模拟患者混合方法研究。
背景:药剂师提供非处方药西地那非的服务于2019年在挪威启动,需要对该服务进行持续评估:绘制服务清单的使用情况图,评估咨询中提供的咨询和信息,深入了解药剂师在咨询过程中的评估,并探索药剂师的服务经验:方法:采用了模拟患者就诊反馈与定性访谈相结合的混合方法。一名 24 岁的模拟患者到药店要求购买西地那非,但在购买之前就结束了。访问过程被录音并进行评估。访问结束后,药剂师应邀获得反馈并参与录音访谈。访问、反馈和访谈均已转录,并通过描述性统计和系统文本压缩进行了分析:在 39 次访问中,分析了 26 次,13 次因药剂师未同意而被排除。有 6 名药剂师(23%)提出了所有核对表问题,15 名药剂师(58%)提出了部分问题。没有一位药剂师提供了指南中的所有咨询要点。提供最多的咨询是 "在 6 个月内找您的全科医生进行健康检查"(7 人,占 27%)。访谈(N = 19)显示,药剂师对患者进行了评估,并对检查表的使用进行了调整。我们发现了一些影响服务的障碍,包括时间压力、药剂师的能力、任务的不舒适性和挑战性:结论:大多数药剂师并未完全遵守非处方药西地那非的强制性核对表,所提供的咨询和信息也很有限。药剂部门必须提高对如何最好地评估和管理申请非处方西地那非患者的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信