Elizabeth K Aldrich, Katherine Sullivan, Jonathan E Wingo, Michael R Esco, James Leeper, Mark T Richardson, Lee J Winchester, Michael V Fedewa
{"title":"The Effect of Resisted Sprint Training on Acceleration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Elizabeth K Aldrich, Katherine Sullivan, Jonathan E Wingo, Michael R Esco, James Leeper, Mark T Richardson, Lee J Winchester, Michael V Fedewa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resisted sprint (RS) training, such as sled or parachute towing, is commonly used for sprint training among field sport athletes. While RS training is frequently employed by athletes and coaches, there is little research on its benefits, especially compared to unresisted running (UR) training programs with similar training volumes. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of RS training on acceleration compared to UR training. Potential sources were limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English prior to June 12, 2022, and gathered from the EBSCOhost, PubMed, and Web of Science online databases identified using combinations of the following terms: <i>towing</i>, <i>sled</i>, \"<i>resisted sprint</i>,\" \"<i>sprint acceleration</i>,\" \"<i>sprint performance</i>,\" and \"<i>sprint speed</i>.\" The search returned 1,159 sources, from which 15 were eligible for inclusion. Fifty effects were used to estimate the impact of RS training on initial sprint speed. Based on the cumulative results from these studies, RS training yielded a small improvement in acceleration but was not different from same volume of UR training (Hedges' d Effect Size=0.11, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.23; p=0.08). These results do not support the use of RS training over UR training for improving initial sprint speed; however, further research should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 6","pages":"986-1002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Resisted sprint (RS) training, such as sled or parachute towing, is commonly used for sprint training among field sport athletes. While RS training is frequently employed by athletes and coaches, there is little research on its benefits, especially compared to unresisted running (UR) training programs with similar training volumes. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of RS training on acceleration compared to UR training. Potential sources were limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English prior to June 12, 2022, and gathered from the EBSCOhost, PubMed, and Web of Science online databases identified using combinations of the following terms: towing, sled, "resisted sprint," "sprint acceleration," "sprint performance," and "sprint speed." The search returned 1,159 sources, from which 15 were eligible for inclusion. Fifty effects were used to estimate the impact of RS training on initial sprint speed. Based on the cumulative results from these studies, RS training yielded a small improvement in acceleration but was not different from same volume of UR training (Hedges' d Effect Size=0.11, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.23; p=0.08). These results do not support the use of RS training over UR training for improving initial sprint speed; however, further research should be conducted.