External Beam Radiation therapy After Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Treatment of Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
YiXing Chen, Yong Hu, Jie Shen, ShiSuo Du, Jing Yan, LeYuan Zhou, Zhe Wang, HaiJie Lu, Lei Xiao, Ping Yang, WenChao Zhu, Jun Wang, GuoWei Yang, JianFeng Luo, Rong Liu, ZhaoChong Zeng
{"title":"External Beam Radiation therapy After Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Treatment of Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial.","authors":"YiXing Chen, Yong Hu, Jie Shen, ShiSuo Du, Jing Yan, LeYuan Zhou, Zhe Wang, HaiJie Lu, Lei Xiao, Ping Yang, WenChao Zhu, Jun Wang, GuoWei Yang, JianFeng Luo, Rong Liu, ZhaoChong Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone with those of TACE combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter randomized study.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>From 2017 to 2022, 74 HCC patients with tumors confined to the liver without vascular invasion were treated with either TACE only (TACE group, 39 patients) or TACE combined with EBRT (TACE + EBRT group, 35 patients). The primary outcome measured was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control, and the assessment of treatment-related toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Due to slow accrual, the trial was closed prematurely after enrolling 74 patients. All patients received 2 cycles of TACE before randomization. The TACE and TACE + EBRT groups showed comparable patient and tumor characteristics. The TACE group underwent a median of 3 TACE cycles, and the TACE + EBRT group received 2 cycles of TACE, and a median of 5500 cGy in 15 fractions. For the TACE group, the median local control (LC) duration was 13.1 months, whereas for the TACE + EBRT group, the median LC was not achieved (P < .001). The PFS was recorded at 11.6 months in the TACE group compared with 15.4 months in the TACE + EBRT group (P = .072). The median OS reached 36.8 months for the TACE group and extended to 47.1 months for the TACE + EBRT group (P = .654). The incidence of toxicity was comparable between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the number of patients enrolled in this clinical trial did not meet expectations. TACE combined with EBRT was shown to be more effective than TACE alone in improving LC without increasing toxicity, whereas PFS and OS were slightly improved. TACE + EBRT can be used as a standard treatment option for patients with inoperable but confined intrahepatic HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":"414-422"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.09.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone with those of TACE combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter randomized study.

Methods and materials: From 2017 to 2022, 74 HCC patients with tumors confined to the liver without vascular invasion were treated with either TACE only (TACE group, 39 patients) or TACE combined with EBRT (TACE + EBRT group, 35 patients). The primary outcome measured was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control, and the assessment of treatment-related toxicity.

Results: Due to slow accrual, the trial was closed prematurely after enrolling 74 patients. All patients received 2 cycles of TACE before randomization. The TACE and TACE + EBRT groups showed comparable patient and tumor characteristics. The TACE group underwent a median of 3 TACE cycles, and the TACE + EBRT group received 2 cycles of TACE, and a median of 5500 cGy in 15 fractions. For the TACE group, the median local control (LC) duration was 13.1 months, whereas for the TACE + EBRT group, the median LC was not achieved (P < .001). The PFS was recorded at 11.6 months in the TACE group compared with 15.4 months in the TACE + EBRT group (P = .072). The median OS reached 36.8 months for the TACE group and extended to 47.1 months for the TACE + EBRT group (P = .654). The incidence of toxicity was comparable between both groups.

Conclusions: Although the number of patients enrolled in this clinical trial did not meet expectations. TACE combined with EBRT was shown to be more effective than TACE alone in improving LC without increasing toxicity, whereas PFS and OS were slightly improved. TACE + EBRT can be used as a standard treatment option for patients with inoperable but confined intrahepatic HCC.

经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)后的体外放射治疗与单纯 TACE 治疗无法手术的 HCC:随机III期试验。
目的:在一项多中心随机研究中,比较单纯经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)与TACE联合体外放射治疗(EBRT)对肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的治疗效果:2017年至2022年,74名肿瘤局限于肝脏且无血管侵犯的HCC患者接受了单纯TACE(TACE组,39名患者)或TACE联合EBRT(TACE+EBRT组,35名患者)治疗。测量的主要结果是总生存期(OS)。次要结果包括无进展生存期(PFS)、局部肿瘤控制率(LC)以及治疗相关毒性评估:由于进展缓慢,该试验在招募 74 名患者后提前结束。所有患者在随机分组前均接受了两个周期的TACE治疗。TACE组和TACE+EBRT组的患者和肿瘤特征具有可比性。TACE 组接受了中位数为 3 个周期的 TACE,而 TACE+EBRT 组接受了两个周期的 TACE 和中位数为 5,500 cGy 的 15 次分次治疗。TACE 组的中位 LC 持续时间为 13.1 个月,而 TACE+EBRT 组未达到中位 LC(PConclusions:尽管该临床试验的入组患者人数未达到预期,但TACE联合EBRT的疗效得到了证实。在改善局部控制(LC)而不增加毒性方面,TACE 联合 EBRT 比单用 TACE 更有效,同时 PFS 和 OS 略有改善。TACE+EBRT可作为无法手术但肝内局限性HCC患者的标准治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信