Agreement between Phenotypically Detected Linezolid Resistance and Mutations in rrl and rplC Genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates Using Nanopore Sequencing.

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
International Journal of Mycobacteriology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-14 DOI:10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_139_24
Senjuti Sengupta, Parul Jain, Rashmi Ratnam, Bhoopendra Kumar Pandey, Urmila Singh, Vijay Kumar, Ashutosh Paliwal, Amita Jain
{"title":"Agreement between Phenotypically Detected Linezolid Resistance and Mutations in rrl and rplC Genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates Using Nanopore Sequencing.","authors":"Senjuti Sengupta, Parul Jain, Rashmi Ratnam, Bhoopendra Kumar Pandey, Urmila Singh, Vijay Kumar, Ashutosh Paliwal, Amita Jain","doi":"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_139_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) is considered the gold standard for detecting linezolid (LZD) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), but it is time-consuming. Nanopore sequencing offers a potentially faster alternative approach. This study evaluated the agreement between phenotypically detected LZD resistance and mutations in the rrl and rplC genes of MTB isolates using nanopore sequencing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive drug-resistant MTB isolates from pulmonary samples collected in 2021 underwent liquid culture (LC) DST for LZD. All resistant isolates and an equal number of susceptible isolates were subjected to targeted sequencing of the rrl and rplC genes using nanopore technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sequencing identified a C154R mutation in the rplC gene in only one LZD-resistant isolate. No mutations were detected in the rrl gene. The agreement between sequencing and LC-DST for detecting LZD resistance was poor (Cohen's kappa: 0.03571, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.034-0.105). Additionally, no significant association was found between LZD resistance and clinical or microbiological outcomes at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed a considerable discrepancy between phenotypic and genotypic detection of LZD resistance in MTB. Further research is needed to better understand the genetic mechanisms underlying LZD resistance and to develop reliable molecular diagnostics for rapid resistance detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14133,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_139_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) is considered the gold standard for detecting linezolid (LZD) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), but it is time-consuming. Nanopore sequencing offers a potentially faster alternative approach. This study evaluated the agreement between phenotypically detected LZD resistance and mutations in the rrl and rplC genes of MTB isolates using nanopore sequencing.

Methods: Consecutive drug-resistant MTB isolates from pulmonary samples collected in 2021 underwent liquid culture (LC) DST for LZD. All resistant isolates and an equal number of susceptible isolates were subjected to targeted sequencing of the rrl and rplC genes using nanopore technology.

Results: Sequencing identified a C154R mutation in the rplC gene in only one LZD-resistant isolate. No mutations were detected in the rrl gene. The agreement between sequencing and LC-DST for detecting LZD resistance was poor (Cohen's kappa: 0.03571, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.034-0.105). Additionally, no significant association was found between LZD resistance and clinical or microbiological outcomes at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion: This study revealed a considerable discrepancy between phenotypic and genotypic detection of LZD resistance in MTB. Further research is needed to better understand the genetic mechanisms underlying LZD resistance and to develop reliable molecular diagnostics for rapid resistance detection.

利用纳米孔测序技术检测结核分枝杆菌对利奈唑胺的表型耐药性与 rrl 和 rplC 基因突变之间的一致性
背景:表型药敏试验(DST)被认为是检测结核分枝杆菌(MTB)对利奈唑胺(LZD)耐药性的黄金标准,但这种方法非常耗时。纳米孔测序提供了一种可能更快的替代方法。本研究利用纳米孔测序技术评估了表型检测到的LZD耐药性与MTB分离株rrl和rplC基因突变之间的一致性:方法:对2021年采集的肺部样本中的耐药MTB分离株进行液体培养(LC)DST检测LZD。对所有耐药分离株和相同数量的易感分离株采用纳米孔技术对 rrl 和 rplC 基因进行靶向测序:结果:测序结果表明,只有一个抗 LZD 的分离株的 rplC 基因发生了 C154R 突变。在 rrl 基因中未检测到突变。测序与 LC-DST 检测 LZD 耐药性的一致性较差(科恩卡帕:0.03571,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.034-0.105)。此外,在6个月的随访中,LZD耐药性与临床或微生物学结果之间未发现明显关联:本研究揭示了 MTB 对 LZD 耐药性的表型检测和基因型检测之间存在相当大的差异。为了更好地了解LZD耐药性的遗传机制,并开发出用于快速检测耐药性的可靠分子诊断方法,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信