Anterior Endocrowns as An Alternative to Core Crown restorations: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hisham A Mously, Ghada H Naguib, Ahmed O Abougazia, Afaf A Almabadi, Osama A Qutub, Mohamed T Hamed
{"title":"Anterior Endocrowns as An Alternative to Core Crown restorations: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hisham A Mously, Ghada H Naguib, Ahmed O Abougazia, Afaf A Almabadi, Osama A Qutub, Mohamed T Hamed","doi":"10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.1216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Restoring extensively damaged endodontically treated teeth presents a challenging task due to the state of biomechanical deterioration affecting long-term prognosis. Therefore, the study aims to assess and compare the biomechanical performance of endocrowns and post core-crown restorations in anterior endodontically treated teeth with severe coronal structure loss. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published from January 2014 to March 2024. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included studies were analyzed using the QUIN tool for risk of bias assessment in in-vitro studies. Additionally, the biomechanical outcomes were collected for qualitative comparative analysis. Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. In most studies, Endocrowns demonstrated comparable fatigue resistance under load to failure to post core-crown restorations. Endocrowns without ferrule exhibited a higher rate of debonding but had significantly more repairable failures. Conversely, post core-crown restorations demonstrated higher fracture resistance with the presence of ferrule, but were associated with more catastrophic failure patterns. Additionally, endocrowns generated lower stress levels in both the restorative material and the luting material compared to post core-crown restorations. Among the tested materials, lithium disilicate ceramics provided the best biomechanical properties. Overall, the studies included provided sufficient information for most evaluation criteria of the QUIN risk of bias assessment tool. Endocrowns are a viable and conservative approach for restoring endodontically treated anterior teeth, offering comparable biomechanical performance to traditional post core-crown restorations and less catastrophic failures. The findings of this systematic review suggest that endocrown restorations, especially with lithium disilicate ceramics and proper ferrule design, can improve fracture resistance and longevity of rehabilitated teeth, enhancing patient outcomes for severely damaged anterior endodontically treated teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":13785,"journal":{"name":"International dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.1216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restoring extensively damaged endodontically treated teeth presents a challenging task due to the state of biomechanical deterioration affecting long-term prognosis. Therefore, the study aims to assess and compare the biomechanical performance of endocrowns and post core-crown restorations in anterior endodontically treated teeth with severe coronal structure loss. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published from January 2014 to March 2024. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included studies were analyzed using the QUIN tool for risk of bias assessment in in-vitro studies. Additionally, the biomechanical outcomes were collected for qualitative comparative analysis. Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. In most studies, Endocrowns demonstrated comparable fatigue resistance under load to failure to post core-crown restorations. Endocrowns without ferrule exhibited a higher rate of debonding but had significantly more repairable failures. Conversely, post core-crown restorations demonstrated higher fracture resistance with the presence of ferrule, but were associated with more catastrophic failure patterns. Additionally, endocrowns generated lower stress levels in both the restorative material and the luting material compared to post core-crown restorations. Among the tested materials, lithium disilicate ceramics provided the best biomechanical properties. Overall, the studies included provided sufficient information for most evaluation criteria of the QUIN risk of bias assessment tool. Endocrowns are a viable and conservative approach for restoring endodontically treated anterior teeth, offering comparable biomechanical performance to traditional post core-crown restorations and less catastrophic failures. The findings of this systematic review suggest that endocrown restorations, especially with lithium disilicate ceramics and proper ferrule design, can improve fracture resistance and longevity of rehabilitated teeth, enhancing patient outcomes for severely damaged anterior endodontically treated teeth.

前牙内冠作为核心冠修复体的替代方案:系统回顾
由于影响长期预后的生物力学恶化状态,修复广泛受损的牙髓治疗牙是一项具有挑战性的任务。因此,本研究旨在评估和比较冠内冠和冠后核修复体在冠状结构严重缺损的前牙根管治疗中的生物力学性能。按照 PRISMA 指南,我们使用 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 对 2014 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月期间发表的文章进行了系统检索。两位独立审稿人根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准筛选研究。纳入的研究采用 QUIN 工具进行分析,以评估体外研究的偏倚风险。此外,还收集了生物力学结果进行定性比较分析。本系统综述共纳入了 12 项研究。在大多数研究中,Endocrowns都表现出了与后牙冠修复体相似的抗疲劳性。没有套圈的 Endocrowns 表现出更高的脱落率,但可修复的失败率明显更高。相反,有卡环的后牙冠修复体抗折断性更高,但灾难性的失败模式也更多。此外,与后桩核冠修复体相比,内冠修复体在修复材料和衬垫材料中产生的应力水平都较低。在测试的材料中,二硅酸锂陶瓷的生物力学特性最好。总的来说,纳入的研究为 QUIN 偏倚风险评估工具的大多数评估标准提供了足够的信息。内冠是修复根管治疗前牙的一种可行且保守的方法,其生物力学性能与传统的桩核冠修复相当,且灾难性故障较少。本系统综述的研究结果表明,内冠修复,尤其是使用二硅酸锂陶瓷和适当的套圈设计,可以提高修复后牙齿的抗折性和使用寿命,改善严重受损的牙髓治疗前牙的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International dental journal
International dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The International Dental Journal features peer-reviewed, scientific articles relevant to international oral health issues, as well as practical, informative articles aimed at clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信