STABILISE for acute type B aortic dissection.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Angiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-18 DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05279-9
Tatiana Cotão, Joel Sousa, Armando Mansilha
{"title":"STABILISE for acute type B aortic dissection.","authors":"Tatiana Cotão, Joel Sousa, Armando Mansilha","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05279-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) is an extended downstream endovascular management technique for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), that aimed to achieve complete aortic remodeling. This systematic review aimed to assess the early and mid-term clinical outcomes with STABILISE in the management of TBAD.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A literature search was performed on the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO databases, which returned 195 studies. Five studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>In total, one hundred patients with acute or subacute TBAD managed with STABILISE were included. All studies reported a technical success of 100%. Thirty-day mortality was estimated at 4% (4/100) with no further deaths documented during an estimated mean follow-up of 12.7 months (range 12-15 months). Five percent developed spinal cord ischemia and another 5% developed visceral artery occlusions. One case of aortic rupture during time of balloon inflation was reported. Rare complications included delayed retrograde dissection (1%), aortobronchial fistula (1%), and renal failure (1%). One case of disconnection between stent-graft and bare stent was documented. Six percent of patients developed endoleak, predominately type I. Overall re-intervention rate was 21%, as reported in all studies. Complete obliteration of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was achieved in 99% of patients and in the abdominal aorta in 96% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>STABILISE technique carries promising early and mid-term outcomes with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity. Excellent results on complete false lumen obliteration were observed. However, the heterogeneity among available studies' methodology does not permit firm conclusions, and further prospective analyses are needed to study the long-term outcomes of STABILISE.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05279-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) is an extended downstream endovascular management technique for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), that aimed to achieve complete aortic remodeling. This systematic review aimed to assess the early and mid-term clinical outcomes with STABILISE in the management of TBAD.

Evidence acquisition: A literature search was performed on the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO databases, which returned 195 studies. Five studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms.

Evidence synthesis: In total, one hundred patients with acute or subacute TBAD managed with STABILISE were included. All studies reported a technical success of 100%. Thirty-day mortality was estimated at 4% (4/100) with no further deaths documented during an estimated mean follow-up of 12.7 months (range 12-15 months). Five percent developed spinal cord ischemia and another 5% developed visceral artery occlusions. One case of aortic rupture during time of balloon inflation was reported. Rare complications included delayed retrograde dissection (1%), aortobronchial fistula (1%), and renal failure (1%). One case of disconnection between stent-graft and bare stent was documented. Six percent of patients developed endoleak, predominately type I. Overall re-intervention rate was 21%, as reported in all studies. Complete obliteration of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was achieved in 99% of patients and in the abdominal aorta in 96% of patients.

Conclusions: STABILISE technique carries promising early and mid-term outcomes with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity. Excellent results on complete false lumen obliteration were observed. However, the heterogeneity among available studies' methodology does not permit firm conclusions, and further prospective analyses are needed to study the long-term outcomes of STABILISE.

STABILISE 治疗急性 B 型主动脉夹层。
导言:主动脉夹层的支架辅助、球囊诱导内膜断裂和复层(STABILISE)是一种针对急性B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的扩展下游血管内治疗技术,旨在实现主动脉的完全重塑。本系统性综述旨在评估 STABILISE 治疗 TBAD 的早期和中期临床疗效:在 Medline、Web of Science、Scopus 和 SciELO 数据库中进行了文献检索,共检索到 195 项研究。共纳入 5 项研究。证据综述:共纳入了 100 名接受 STABILISE 治疗的急性或亚急性 TBAD 患者。所有研究报告的技术成功率均为 100%。30天死亡率估计为4%(4/100),平均随访时间估计为12.7个月(12-15个月),无死亡记录。5%的患者出现脊髓缺血,另有5%的患者出现内脏动脉闭塞。据报道,有一例主动脉在球囊充气时破裂。罕见并发症包括延迟性逆行剥离(1%)、主动脉支气管瘘(1%)和肾功能衰竭(1%)。有一例记录显示支架移植物与裸支架断开。6%的患者出现了内漏,主要是I型内漏。所有研究报告显示,再次介入率为21%。99%的患者胸主动脉假腔完全闭塞,96%的患者腹主动脉假腔完全闭塞:结论:STABILISE 技术具有良好的早期和中期效果,技术成功率高,死亡率和发病率低。假腔完全闭塞的效果极佳。然而,由于现有研究的方法存在异质性,因此无法得出肯定的结论,还需要进一步的前瞻性分析来研究 STABILISE 的长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信