Safety of adjuvant open axillary access during complex thoracoabdominal aortic endovascular procedures.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Angiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05258-1
Fabricio Barahona, Gaspar Mestres, Xavier Yugueros, Donovan Ruiz, Victoria Gamé, Daniel Gil-Sala, Carla Blanco, Vicente Riambau
{"title":"Safety of adjuvant open axillary access during complex thoracoabdominal aortic endovascular procedures.","authors":"Fabricio Barahona, Gaspar Mestres, Xavier Yugueros, Donovan Ruiz, Victoria Gamé, Daniel Gil-Sala, Carla Blanco, Vicente Riambau","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05258-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular treatment of aortic diseases with complex anatomy may require an additional upper extremity arterial access (like axillary access) for support during aortic navigation and allowing the use of larger sheaths for thoracoabdominal antegrade access. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of the open axillary approach as adjuvant access in complex thoracoabdominal aortic endovascular interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A monocentric retrospective study was performed, including all patients with a complex aortic endovascular procedure (fEVAR, bEVAR, chEVAR or TEVAR), elective or urgent, with open surgical exposure of the axillary artery as adjuvant access, between 2012 and 2022. Demographic data, diagnosis and urgency criteria, type of aortic intervention, size of axillary sheath, use of through-and-through maneuver, and features by computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the axillary artery and aortic arch were recorded. The appearance of local and aortic postoperative complications were described, and possible prognostic factors were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients (38 men) were included, median age 78 years (range 50-87), 33 with intact thoracoabdominal aneurysms, eight previous EVAR endoleaks and seven aortic aneurysm ruptures. 28 fEVAR/bEVAR, 17 chEVAR and three TEVAR procedures with axillary access were performed. Left infraclavicular axillary access was the most common approach (94%), along with a 12 French (F) median sheath (range 7-20). Eight (16.7%) local complications were identified: three bleedings, one hematoma, three focal dissections in the subclavian artery, and one brachial embolism, all successfully resolved. The only factor related to local complications was small axillary diameter (median 10.7 vs. 14.6 mm; P<0.001), a subclavian/sheath ratio less than one was associated to more local complications (P=0.02). Regarding aortic complications, two (4.1%) type B asymptomatic aortic dissections with left juxta-subclavian tear were found, attributed to local manipulation, occurring only in urgent procedures (P=0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of open axillary access as an adjuvant approach in complex aortic endovascular surgery, although it is very useful and usually safe, can be associated with subclavian or even aortic complications (not reported until now), especially in cases with small subclavian diameters and urgent cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.24.05258-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endovascular treatment of aortic diseases with complex anatomy may require an additional upper extremity arterial access (like axillary access) for support during aortic navigation and allowing the use of larger sheaths for thoracoabdominal antegrade access. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of the open axillary approach as adjuvant access in complex thoracoabdominal aortic endovascular interventions.

Methods: A monocentric retrospective study was performed, including all patients with a complex aortic endovascular procedure (fEVAR, bEVAR, chEVAR or TEVAR), elective or urgent, with open surgical exposure of the axillary artery as adjuvant access, between 2012 and 2022. Demographic data, diagnosis and urgency criteria, type of aortic intervention, size of axillary sheath, use of through-and-through maneuver, and features by computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the axillary artery and aortic arch were recorded. The appearance of local and aortic postoperative complications were described, and possible prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results: Forty-eight patients (38 men) were included, median age 78 years (range 50-87), 33 with intact thoracoabdominal aneurysms, eight previous EVAR endoleaks and seven aortic aneurysm ruptures. 28 fEVAR/bEVAR, 17 chEVAR and three TEVAR procedures with axillary access were performed. Left infraclavicular axillary access was the most common approach (94%), along with a 12 French (F) median sheath (range 7-20). Eight (16.7%) local complications were identified: three bleedings, one hematoma, three focal dissections in the subclavian artery, and one brachial embolism, all successfully resolved. The only factor related to local complications was small axillary diameter (median 10.7 vs. 14.6 mm; P<0.001), a subclavian/sheath ratio less than one was associated to more local complications (P=0.02). Regarding aortic complications, two (4.1%) type B asymptomatic aortic dissections with left juxta-subclavian tear were found, attributed to local manipulation, occurring only in urgent procedures (P=0.032).

Conclusions: The use of open axillary access as an adjuvant approach in complex aortic endovascular surgery, although it is very useful and usually safe, can be associated with subclavian or even aortic complications (not reported until now), especially in cases with small subclavian diameters and urgent cases.

复杂胸腹主动脉血管内手术中辅助开放腋窝入路的安全性。
背景:对解剖结构复杂的主动脉疾病进行血管内治疗可能需要额外的上肢动脉通路(如腋窝通路),以便在主动脉导航过程中提供支持,并允许使用更大的鞘管进行胸腹腔前向通路。本研究的目的是评估在复杂的胸腹主动脉血管内介入手术中将开放式腋窝入路作为辅助入路的安全性:方法:研究人员进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,包括2012年至2022年期间所有接受复杂主动脉血管内手术(fEVAR、bEVAR、chEVAR或TEVAR)的患者,无论是择期手术还是急诊手术,均以腋动脉开放手术入路作为辅助入路。研究人员记录了腋动脉和主动脉弓的人口统计学数据、诊断和紧急标准、主动脉介入类型、腋动脉鞘的大小、穿刺手法的使用以及计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)的特征。对局部和主动脉术后并发症的出现进行了描述,并分析了可能的预后因素:共纳入 48 名患者(38 名男性),中位年龄 78 岁(50-87 岁不等),33 名患者有完整的胸腹动脉瘤,8 名患者曾有 EVAR 内漏,7 名患者有主动脉瘤破裂。共进行了28例fEVAR/bEVAR、17例chEVAR和3例TEVAR手术,均采用腋窝入路。左锁骨下腋窝入路是最常见的入路(94%),中位鞘为 12 French (F)(范围 7-20)。共发现八例(16.7%)局部并发症:三例出血、一例血肿、三例锁骨下动脉局灶性剥离和一例肱动脉栓塞,均已成功解决。与局部并发症有关的唯一因素是腋窝直径过小(中位数为10.7毫米对14.6毫米;PC结论:在复杂的主动脉血管内手术中使用开放式腋窝入路作为辅助方法虽然非常有用,而且通常也很安全,但可能会引起锁骨下甚至主动脉并发症(迄今为止尚未报道),尤其是在锁骨下直径较小的病例和急诊病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信