Rheumatic adverse events associated with biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jenny B. Xiao HBSc, MSc, Helen Hsiao BSc, Carlos Khalil MD, John M. Lee MD, FRCSC, MSc
{"title":"Rheumatic adverse events associated with biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jenny B. Xiao HBSc, MSc,&nbsp;Helen Hsiao BSc,&nbsp;Carlos Khalil MD,&nbsp;John M. Lee MD, FRCSC, MSc","doi":"10.1002/alr.23453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Biologic therapies approved for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have well-established safety profiles but reports of rheumatic adverse events (AEs) are increasing and not well defined. This review aims to assess the risk and incidence of rheumatic AEs associated with biologic therapy in CRSwNP and summarize current reported management strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42024525663]. A search was conducted in four electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until January 4, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened citations and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. Data were pooled using a random effects model to calculate overall incidence and relative risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-one studies met the final inclusion criteria, totaling 3434 patients of which 2763 (80%) received either dupilumab (<i>n</i> = 2257; 82%), mepolizumab (<i>n</i> = 372; 13%), or omalizumab (<i>n</i> = 134; 5%) for treatment of CRSwNP. The overall incidence rate for any on-treatment rheumatic AE was 0.05 per person–year (95% CI, 0.03–0.09, <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 75%). Biologic therapy increased the risk of developing a rheumatic AE (RR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.29–4.94) compared with placebo. The most frequently reported rheumatic AE was arthralgia or joint pain (<i>n</i> = 94; 95%), followed by lupus-like syndrome or lupus erythematosus-like reaction (<i>n</i> = 2; 2.5%). Discontinuation of treatment was the most common intervention (<i>n</i> = 21, 39%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Biologic therapy increases the risk of rheumatic AEs in CRSwNP patients by over twofold. Healthcare providers should remain vigilant in monitoring rheumatic AEs and apply appropriate management strategies on a case-by-case basis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":"14 10","pages":"1618-1633"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alr.23453","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alr.23453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Biologic therapies approved for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have well-established safety profiles but reports of rheumatic adverse events (AEs) are increasing and not well defined. This review aims to assess the risk and incidence of rheumatic AEs associated with biologic therapy in CRSwNP and summarize current reported management strategies.

Methods

A protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42024525663]. A search was conducted in four electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until January 4, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened citations and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. Data were pooled using a random effects model to calculate overall incidence and relative risk.

Results

Twenty-one studies met the final inclusion criteria, totaling 3434 patients of which 2763 (80%) received either dupilumab (n = 2257; 82%), mepolizumab (n = 372; 13%), or omalizumab (n = 134; 5%) for treatment of CRSwNP. The overall incidence rate for any on-treatment rheumatic AE was 0.05 per person–year (95% CI, 0.03–0.09, I= 75%). Biologic therapy increased the risk of developing a rheumatic AE (RR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.29–4.94) compared with placebo. The most frequently reported rheumatic AE was arthralgia or joint pain (n = 94; 95%), followed by lupus-like syndrome or lupus erythematosus-like reaction (n = 2; 2.5%). Discontinuation of treatment was the most common intervention (n = 21, 39%).

Conclusion

Biologic therapy increases the risk of rheumatic AEs in CRSwNP patients by over twofold. Healthcare providers should remain vigilant in monitoring rheumatic AEs and apply appropriate management strategies on a case-by-case basis.

Abstract Image

与慢性鼻炎生物疗法相关的风湿不良事件:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:已获批用于治疗慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的生物疗法具有良好的安全性,但有关风湿性不良事件(AEs)的报道却在不断增加,且定义不清。本综述旨在评估与CRSwNP生物疗法相关的风湿性不良反应的风险和发生率,并总结目前报道的管理策略:方法:在 PROSPERO [CRD42024525663]上注册了一项研究方案。在四个电子数据库中进行了检索:Medline (Ovid)、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane CENTRAL。两名审稿人独立筛选引文并提取数据。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的关键评估工具对方法学质量进行评估。采用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总,计算总体发病率和相对风险:21项研究符合最终纳入标准,共纳入了3434名患者,其中2763人(80%)接受了杜匹单抗(n = 2257; 82%)、甲波利珠单抗(n = 372; 13%)或奥马珠单抗(n = 134; 5%)治疗CRSwNP。任何治疗中风湿性 AE 的总发病率为 0.05 人/年(95% CI,0.03-0.09,I2 = 75%)。与安慰剂相比,生物疗法增加了发生风湿性 AE 的风险(RR = 2.53;95% CI,1.29-4.94)。最常见的风湿性 AE 是关节痛或关节疼痛(n = 94;95%),其次是狼疮样综合征或红斑狼疮样反应(n = 2;2.5%)。停止治疗是最常见的干预措施(n = 21,39%):结论:生物治疗会使 CRSwNP 患者发生风湿性 AEs 的风险增加两倍以上。医疗服务提供者在监测风湿性 AEs 时应保持警惕,并根据具体情况采取适当的管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信