Corneal densitometry changes post-CXL for keratoconus: Comparative evaluation of epithelium-off, contact lens-assisted, and transepithelial techniques.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-10 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_485_24
Barkha Gupta, Chintan Malhotra, Supriya Dhar, Khushdeep Abhyapal, Arun K Jain, Amit Gupta
{"title":"Corneal densitometry changes post-CXL for keratoconus: Comparative evaluation of epithelium-off, contact lens-assisted, and transepithelial techniques.","authors":"Barkha Gupta, Chintan Malhotra, Supriya Dhar, Khushdeep Abhyapal, Arun K Jain, Amit Gupta","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_485_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate changes in corneal backscattering after collagen cross-linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus and compare its course with different techniques - standard epithelium-off CXL (SCXL), contact lens-assisted CXL (CACXL), and transepithelial CXL (TECXL).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Advanced Eye Center, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-four eyes (SCXL: 47, CACXL: 30, and TECXL: 17) were compared. Corneal haze was quantified using Scheimpflug tomography, pre- and post-CXL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline mean density score of the central anterior stromal layer was 16.14 ± 7.07, 15.85 ± 7.89 and 15.89 ± 7.21 in SCXL, CACXL, and TECXL groups, respectively ( P 0.93). After SCXL, the score increased to 28.83 and 31.34 at 1 and 3 months, respectively (both P < 0.001) and dropped at 6 months (28.66, P < 0.001) and 12 months (23.72, P 0.003). Post-CACXL, the mean densitometry peaked at 3 months (20.35, P 0.14) and returned toward baseline at 6 months (18.82, P 0.15). After TECXL, it increased slightly at 1 month (18.47, P 0.17), decreased at 3 months (14.88, P 0.7), and plateaued over 1 year. No correlation with visual acuity was seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Corneal haze increased significantly after SCXL, peaking at 3 months, declining over 6-12 months, and returning to baseline at 12 months. In contrast, post-TECXL and -CACXL, there was an insignificant increase in anterior corneal haze, which returned to baseline within 3-6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"102-109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_485_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate changes in corneal backscattering after collagen cross-linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus and compare its course with different techniques - standard epithelium-off CXL (SCXL), contact lens-assisted CXL (CACXL), and transepithelial CXL (TECXL).

Setting: Advanced Eye Center, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Design: Retrospective comparative study.

Methods: Ninety-four eyes (SCXL: 47, CACXL: 30, and TECXL: 17) were compared. Corneal haze was quantified using Scheimpflug tomography, pre- and post-CXL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results: The baseline mean density score of the central anterior stromal layer was 16.14 ± 7.07, 15.85 ± 7.89 and 15.89 ± 7.21 in SCXL, CACXL, and TECXL groups, respectively ( P 0.93). After SCXL, the score increased to 28.83 and 31.34 at 1 and 3 months, respectively (both P < 0.001) and dropped at 6 months (28.66, P < 0.001) and 12 months (23.72, P 0.003). Post-CACXL, the mean densitometry peaked at 3 months (20.35, P 0.14) and returned toward baseline at 6 months (18.82, P 0.15). After TECXL, it increased slightly at 1 month (18.47, P 0.17), decreased at 3 months (14.88, P 0.7), and plateaued over 1 year. No correlation with visual acuity was seen.

Conclusion: Corneal haze increased significantly after SCXL, peaking at 3 months, declining over 6-12 months, and returning to baseline at 12 months. In contrast, post-TECXL and -CACXL, there was an insignificant increase in anterior corneal haze, which returned to baseline within 3-6 months.

角膜塑形镜(CXL)治疗角膜炎后角膜密度的变化:上皮脱落、隐形眼镜辅助和经上皮技术的比较评估。
目的:评估胶原交联(CXL)治疗渐进性角膜炎后角膜反向散射的变化,并比较不同技术--标准上皮脱落CXL(SCXL)、隐形眼镜辅助CXL(CACXL)和经上皮CXL(TECXL)--的治疗过程:地点:印度昌迪加尔医学教育与研究研究生院高级眼科中心:设计:回顾性比较研究:比较了 94 只眼睛(SCXL:47 只,CACXL:30 只,TECXL:17 只)。使用 Scheimpflug 层析成像对角膜混浊进行量化,分别在角膜塑形术前和术后 1、3、6 和 12 个月进行量化:结果:SCXL 组、CACXL 组和 TECXL 组中央前基质层的基线平均密度评分分别为 16.14 ± 7.07、15.85 ± 7.89 和 15.89 ± 7.21(P 0.93)。SCXL 后,1 个月和 3 个月的评分分别升至 28.83 和 31.34(P 均<0.001),6 个月(28.66,P<0.001)和 12 个月(23.72,P 0.003)时评分下降。CACXL 后,平均密度测量值在 3 个月时达到峰值(20.35,P 0.14),在 6 个月时恢复到基线(18.82,P 0.15)。TECXL 后,1 个月时密度略有上升(18.47,P 0.17),3 个月时下降(14.88,P 0.7),1 年后趋于稳定。结论:结论:SCXL 后角膜混浊度明显增加,3 个月时达到高峰,6-12 个月时有所下降,12 个月时恢复到基线。相比之下,TECXL 和 -CACXL 术后角膜前混浊度增加不明显,但在 3-6 个月内又恢复到基线水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信