Unilateral Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease: Do Patients Benefit From Thromboendarterectomy? Case Series From Three CTEPH Centres

Abstract

Background

Unilateral chronic thromboembolism pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is very rare. There is limited information on the safety and efficacy of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in this population. This study investigated the effectiveness of PEA in this unique disease.

Methods

This multicentre study included patients with unilateral CTEPD from three referral centres in the United States, Turkey, and Iran. The patients’ demographic information, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and haemodynamics were evaluated.

Result

Of the 1,031 patients who had undergone PEA, 39 patients (3.7%) had pure unilateral involvement, of whom 28 were female (71.8%). There was a significant improvement in the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP, 26 mmHg vs 21 mmHg; p=0.011) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR, 202 vs 136 dynes∗sec¹∗cm^-5; p=0.014). There was also a significant improvement in NYHA functional class (p<0.001) and 6MWD (360 vs 409 m; p<0.001). In the nine patients with normal haemodynamic parameters at rest, there was no significant change in median 6MWD (448.5 vs 449 m; p=0.208), mPAP (19 mmHg vs 16.5 mmHg; p=0.397), and PVR (129 vs 84.5 dynes∗sec¹∗cm^-5; p=0.128). The most common postoperative complication was ipsilateral pleural effusion. One patient needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. No patient died within the 1-year follow up.

Conclusion

Pulmonary endarterectomy is a safe and effective procedure for improving the symptoms and haemodynamic parameters of patients with unilateral CTEPH. Symptomatic patients with unilateral chronic thromboembolic disease are suitable for PEA.