Physical Function Trajectory among High-Functioning Long-Term Care Facility Residents: Utilizing Japanese National Data.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kasumi Ikuta, Maiko Noguchi-Watanabe, Miya Aishima, Tatsuhiko Anzai, Kunihiko Takahashi, Sakiko Fukui
{"title":"Physical Function Trajectory among High-Functioning Long-Term Care Facility Residents: Utilizing Japanese National Data.","authors":"Kasumi Ikuta, Maiko Noguchi-Watanabe, Miya Aishima, Tatsuhiko Anzai, Kunihiko Takahashi, Sakiko Fukui","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics9050123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical function trajectory (PFT) is associated with mortality and hospitalization risks. We aimed to identify and compare the PFTs of newly admitted high-functioning older adults during their first six months at long-term care (LTC) facilities. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we included newly admitted high-functioning older adults (Barthel index > 60) from 47 Japanese LTC facilities. The primary outcome was physical function changes after admission. Data were collected from the Long-Term Care Information System for Evidence (LIFE), which monitored LTC facility residents' function between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022. A group-based trajectory model and binomial logistic regression analyses were applied to identify and compare residents' PFTs. Among the 718 residents included, the average age was 85.69 years and 64.5% were female. PFTs were classified as maintenance (66.0%), improvement (9.5%), slight decline (16.6%), and large decline (7.9%). The improvement group had significantly fewer residents who expressed a lack of interest in daily activities (odds ratio (OR) 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.97) compared to the maintenance group. The large decline group had significantly more residents with a low BMI at admission (OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.29-4.55) and residents who did not use dentures (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.95), compared to the maintenance group. Considering future PFTs may aid the development of care plans and the provision of appropriate interventions. Moreover, utilizing existing data has the potential to maintain residents' physical independence and enhance the quality of care without burdening residents themselves or staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9050123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical function trajectory (PFT) is associated with mortality and hospitalization risks. We aimed to identify and compare the PFTs of newly admitted high-functioning older adults during their first six months at long-term care (LTC) facilities. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we included newly admitted high-functioning older adults (Barthel index > 60) from 47 Japanese LTC facilities. The primary outcome was physical function changes after admission. Data were collected from the Long-Term Care Information System for Evidence (LIFE), which monitored LTC facility residents' function between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022. A group-based trajectory model and binomial logistic regression analyses were applied to identify and compare residents' PFTs. Among the 718 residents included, the average age was 85.69 years and 64.5% were female. PFTs were classified as maintenance (66.0%), improvement (9.5%), slight decline (16.6%), and large decline (7.9%). The improvement group had significantly fewer residents who expressed a lack of interest in daily activities (odds ratio (OR) 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.97) compared to the maintenance group. The large decline group had significantly more residents with a low BMI at admission (OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.29-4.55) and residents who did not use dentures (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.95), compared to the maintenance group. Considering future PFTs may aid the development of care plans and the provision of appropriate interventions. Moreover, utilizing existing data has the potential to maintain residents' physical independence and enhance the quality of care without burdening residents themselves or staff.

高功能长期护理机构居民的身体功能轨迹:利用日本全国数据。
身体功能轨迹(PFT)与死亡率和住院风险有关。我们的目的是识别和比较新入院的高功能老年人在长期护理(LTC)机构头六个月的 PFT。在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了来自日本 47 家长期护理机构的新入院高功能老年人(巴特尔指数大于 60)。研究的主要结果是入院后身体功能的变化。数据收集自长期护理证据信息系统(LIFE),该系统监测了 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 31 日期间长期护理机构居民的功能。采用基于组别的轨迹模型和二项式逻辑回归分析来识别和比较居民的 PFT。在纳入的 718 名住院患者中,平均年龄为 85.69 岁,64.5% 为女性。PFT 分为维持组(66.0%)、改善组(9.5%)、轻微下降组(16.6%)和大幅下降组(7.9%)。与维持组相比,改善组中对日常活动缺乏兴趣的住院患者明显较少(几率比(OR)0.45;95% 置信区间(CI)0.21-0.97)。与维持组相比,大幅下降组中入院时体重指数低(OR 2.42;95% 置信区间 1.29-4.55)和不使用假牙(OR 0.49;95% 置信区间 0.26-0.95)的住院患者明显较多。考虑未来的 PFT 可以帮助制定护理计划和提供适当的干预措施。此外,利用现有数据有可能保持住院患者的身体独立性并提高护理质量,同时不会给住院患者本人或工作人员带来负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信