Is the Silfverskiöld Test a valid tool for evaluating calf muscles spastic overactivity in patients with stroke? A retrospective observational study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Alessandro Picelli, Rita DI Censo, Cecilia Angeli, Stefania Spina, Andrea Santamato, Alessio Baricich, Nicola Smania, Mirko Filippetti
{"title":"Is the Silfverskiöld Test a valid tool for evaluating calf muscles spastic overactivity in patients with stroke? A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Alessandro Picelli, Rita DI Censo, Cecilia Angeli, Stefania Spina, Andrea Santamato, Alessio Baricich, Nicola Smania, Mirko Filippetti","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08153-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot is a common postural pattern in patients who suffer from post-stroke spasticity. To date, some clinicians use the Silfverskiöld Test in their practice to differentiate between gastrocnemius and soleus muscle overactivity in patients with spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot. This use of the Silfverskiöld Test goes beyond its original aim, which was to distinguish isolated gastrocnemius contracture in patients with equinus deformity.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the Silfverskiöld Test validity for evaluating spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot (i.e., differentiation between gastrocnemius and soleus muscle overactivity) by checking its outcome against those of selective diagnostic nerve block of tibial motor nerve branches to the soleus, gastrocnemius and tibialis posterior muscles.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The design of the study was retrospective observational.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was set in a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Sixty-seven adult stroke patients with spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each patient underwent selective diagnostic nerve block of tibial motor nerve branches to the soleus, gastrocnemius and tibialis posterior muscles. All patients were evaluated before diagnostic nerve block by means of the Silfverskiöld Test which was considered positive when ankle joint passive dorsiflexion was greater with the knee flexed than extended. Furthermore, they were assessed before and after nerve block by means of the modified Ashworth Scale and the Tardieu Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample included 41 males and 26 females (mean age 57.6 years) suffering from spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot due to chronic stroke (mean time from onset 2.4 years). Forty-eight patients out of 67 presented with positive Silfverskiöld Test. The χ<sup>2</sup> test showed no association between the Silfverskiöld Test and spastic overactivity of the gastrocnemius (P=0.253), soleus (P=0.605) and tibialis posterior (P=0.462) muscles as evaluated by serial selective diagnostic block of the tibial nerve motor branches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings do not support the Silfverskiöld Test as a valid tool for evaluating spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot to differentiate between gastrocnemius, soleus and tibialis posterior spastic muscle overactivity in adult patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>The choice for an appropriate management of spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot in adults with stroke should not be mainly defined on the base of Silfverskiöld Test.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08153-X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot is a common postural pattern in patients who suffer from post-stroke spasticity. To date, some clinicians use the Silfverskiöld Test in their practice to differentiate between gastrocnemius and soleus muscle overactivity in patients with spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot. This use of the Silfverskiöld Test goes beyond its original aim, which was to distinguish isolated gastrocnemius contracture in patients with equinus deformity.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the Silfverskiöld Test validity for evaluating spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot (i.e., differentiation between gastrocnemius and soleus muscle overactivity) by checking its outcome against those of selective diagnostic nerve block of tibial motor nerve branches to the soleus, gastrocnemius and tibialis posterior muscles.

Design: The design of the study was retrospective observational.

Setting: The study was set in a university hospital.

Population: Sixty-seven adult stroke patients with spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot.

Methods: Each patient underwent selective diagnostic nerve block of tibial motor nerve branches to the soleus, gastrocnemius and tibialis posterior muscles. All patients were evaluated before diagnostic nerve block by means of the Silfverskiöld Test which was considered positive when ankle joint passive dorsiflexion was greater with the knee flexed than extended. Furthermore, they were assessed before and after nerve block by means of the modified Ashworth Scale and the Tardieu Scale.

Results: Our sample included 41 males and 26 females (mean age 57.6 years) suffering from spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot due to chronic stroke (mean time from onset 2.4 years). Forty-eight patients out of 67 presented with positive Silfverskiöld Test. The χ2 test showed no association between the Silfverskiöld Test and spastic overactivity of the gastrocnemius (P=0.253), soleus (P=0.605) and tibialis posterior (P=0.462) muscles as evaluated by serial selective diagnostic block of the tibial nerve motor branches.

Conclusions: Our findings do not support the Silfverskiöld Test as a valid tool for evaluating spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot to differentiate between gastrocnemius, soleus and tibialis posterior spastic muscle overactivity in adult patients with stroke.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The choice for an appropriate management of spastic equinus (plantar flexed) foot in adults with stroke should not be mainly defined on the base of Silfverskiöld Test.

Silfverskiöld 测试是评估中风患者小腿肌肉痉挛过度活动的有效工具吗?一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:痉挛性马蹄内翻足(跖屈足)是中风后痉挛患者常见的姿势模式。迄今为止,一些临床医生在实践中使用 Silfverskiöld 试验来区分痉挛性马蹄内翻足患者的腓肠肌和比目鱼肌过度活动。Silfverskiöld 试验的最初目的是区分马蹄内翻足畸形患者的孤立腓肠肌挛缩、目的:本研究旨在通过比目鱼肌、腓肠肌和胫骨后肌的胫骨运动神经分支选择性诊断性神经阻滞的结果,研究 Silfverskiöld 试验在评估痉挛性马蹄内翻足(跖屈足)(即区分腓肠肌和比目鱼肌过度活动)方面的有效性:研究设计为回顾性观察:研究地点:某大学附属医院:67名患有痉挛性马蹄内翻足(跖屈足)的成年中风患者:每位患者都接受了通向比目鱼肌、腓肠肌和胫骨后肌的胫骨运动神经分支的选择性诊断性神经阻滞。所有患者在诊断性神经阻滞前均接受了 Silfverskiöld 试验评估,当膝关节屈曲时踝关节被动外展大于伸展时,该试验即为阳性。此外,他们在神经阻滞前后还接受了改良阿什沃斯量表(Ashworth Scale)和塔迪厄量表(Tardieu Scale)的评估:我们的样本包括 41 名男性和 26 名女性(平均年龄为 57.6 岁)因慢性中风(平均发病时间为 2.4 年)而患有痉挛性马蹄内翻足(跖屈足)的患者。67 名患者中有 48 名患者的 Silfverskiöld 试验呈阳性。χ2检验显示,腓肠肌(P=0.253)、比目鱼肌(P=0.605)和胫骨后肌(P=0.462)的痉挛性过度活动与胫神经运动分支的连续选择性诊断阻滞评估之间没有关联:我们的研究结果不支持将 Silfverskiöld 试验作为评估痉挛性马蹄内翻足(跖屈足)以区分成年中风患者腓肠肌、比目鱼肌和胫骨后肌痉挛性肌过度活动的有效工具:对临床康复的影响:选择适当的方法治疗成人中风患者的痉挛性马蹄内翻足(足底屈曲),不应主要依据 Silfverskiöld 试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信