Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: Apatite Deposition on Root Canal Dentin and pH Variation Analysis.

Q1 Dentistry
Ike Dwi Maharti, Romilda Rosseti, Dini Asrianti, Nendar Herdianto, Winda Rianti
{"title":"Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: Apatite Deposition on Root Canal Dentin and pH Variation Analysis.","authors":"Ike Dwi Maharti, Romilda Rosseti, Dini Asrianti, Nendar Herdianto, Winda Rianti","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study analyzes the biomineralization potential of calcium silicate-based sealers Ceraseal (Meta Biomed Co., Cheongju, Korea) and AH Plus Bioceramic (Dentsply Sirona, United States), focusing on evaluating apatite deposition in root canal dentin and pH increases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> Calcium silicate-based sealers Ceraseal (Meta Biomed Co.) and AH Plus Bioceramic (Dentsply Sirona) were applied to the root canal dentin of premolars that had undergone root canal preparation procedures. This was followed by a 14-day immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Biomineralization analysis was performed by analyzing the formation of the apatite layer after the 14-day immersion. The thickness of the apatite layer deposits was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Additionally, the sealers were placed in molds and submerged in PBS solution with pH measurements taken on days 0, 7, and 14 using a digital pH meter.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong> The average thickness of apatite deposition in the interfacial layer was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney's test. The pH value differences among the groups were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance test, followed by a post hoc least significant difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were differences in the apatite deposition in the interfacial layer between Ceraseal and AH Plus Bioceramic within 14 days of observation. There was a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between the pH values of Ceraseal and AH Plus Bioceramic at 7 and 14 days of observation. Ceraseal showed greater alkalizing activity compared with AH Plus Bioceramic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Calcium silicate-based sealer Ceraseal showed better biomineralization potential than AH Plus Bioceramic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  This study analyzes the biomineralization potential of calcium silicate-based sealers Ceraseal (Meta Biomed Co., Cheongju, Korea) and AH Plus Bioceramic (Dentsply Sirona, United States), focusing on evaluating apatite deposition in root canal dentin and pH increases.

Materials and methods:  Calcium silicate-based sealers Ceraseal (Meta Biomed Co.) and AH Plus Bioceramic (Dentsply Sirona) were applied to the root canal dentin of premolars that had undergone root canal preparation procedures. This was followed by a 14-day immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Biomineralization analysis was performed by analyzing the formation of the apatite layer after the 14-day immersion. The thickness of the apatite layer deposits was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Additionally, the sealers were placed in molds and submerged in PBS solution with pH measurements taken on days 0, 7, and 14 using a digital pH meter.

Statistical analysis:  The average thickness of apatite deposition in the interfacial layer was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney's test. The pH value differences among the groups were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance test, followed by a post hoc least significant difference.

Results:  There were differences in the apatite deposition in the interfacial layer between Ceraseal and AH Plus Bioceramic within 14 days of observation. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the pH values of Ceraseal and AH Plus Bioceramic at 7 and 14 days of observation. Ceraseal showed greater alkalizing activity compared with AH Plus Bioceramic.

Conclusion:  Calcium silicate-based sealer Ceraseal showed better biomineralization potential than AH Plus Bioceramic.

硅酸钙封闭剂:根管牙本质上的磷灰石沉积和 pH 值变化分析。
研究目的本研究分析了硅酸钙封闭剂Ceraseal(Meta Biomed公司,韩国清州)和AH Plus生物陶瓷(Dentsply Sirona公司,美国)的生物矿化潜力,重点评估了磷灰石在根管牙本质中的沉积情况和pH值的增加情况:将硅酸钙封闭剂 Ceraseal(Meta Biomed 公司)和 AH Plus Bioceramic(Dentsply Sirona 公司)涂抹在经过根管预备程序的前臼齿根管牙本质上。然后在磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中浸泡 14 天。通过分析浸泡 14 天后磷灰石层的形成情况来进行生物矿化分析。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察磷灰石层沉积的厚度。此外,将密封剂放入模具中并浸没在 PBS 溶液中,在第 0、7 和 14 天使用数字 pH 计测量 pH 值:采用 Mann-Whitney 检验分析界面层磷灰石沉积的平均厚度。各组之间的 pH 值差异采用单因素方差分析,然后进行事后最小显著性差异分析:结果:在观察的 14 天内,Ceraseal 和 AH Plus Bioceramic 在界面层磷灰石沉积方面存在差异。结果:在 14 天的观察期内,Ceraseal 和 AH Plus Bioceramic 在界面层中的磷灰石沉积存在差异:硅酸钙封闭剂 Ceraseal 的生物矿化潜力优于 AH Plus Bioceramic。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信