Leg fidgeting alleviates reduced oxygen extraction in the gastrocnemius muscle caused by prolonged sitting: a randomized crossover trial.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Hajime Tamiya, Kazuki Hotta, Megumi Hoshiai, Yuko Kurosawa, Takafumi Hamaoka, Atsuhiro Tsubaki
{"title":"Leg fidgeting alleviates reduced oxygen extraction in the gastrocnemius muscle caused by prolonged sitting: a randomized crossover trial.","authors":"Hajime Tamiya, Kazuki Hotta, Megumi Hoshiai, Yuko Kurosawa, Takafumi Hamaoka, Atsuhiro Tsubaki","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05613-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oxygen extraction in skeletal muscle is an important determinant of exercise tolerance. Prolonged sitting decreases oxygen extraction in the gastrocnemius muscle. However, the underlying mechanism remains unknown, and preventive measures are yet to be established. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism by which prolonged sitting decreased muscle oxygen extraction and investigate preventive measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten healthy young males (age 21.2 ± 0.4 years; body mass index, 20.5 ± 1.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to each of the following conditions: 3-h supine (CON), 3-h sitting (SIT), and 3-h fidgeting of one lower leg during sitting (FID). Oxygen extraction from the gastrocnemius muscle was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy and the vascular occlusion test under each condition. The rate of change in total Hb + Mb (THb) was measured as an indicator of venous stasis and interstitial fluid accumulation in the lower leg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Muscle oxygen extraction was significantly lower at 180 min for SIT and FID than for CON (4384.2 ± 1426.8; 5281.5 ± 1823.7; 6517.4 ± 1390.8 a.u., respectively) and significantly higher for FID than for SIT (5281.5 ± 1823.7 vs. 4384.2 ± 1426.8 a.u., respectively). The rate of THb change was significantly higher at 180 min for SIT than for CON and FID (12.9 ± 15.1; -2.3 ± 5.7; 2.2 ± 11.6%, respectively). However, no significant difference was observed between CON and FID.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that 3-h prolonged sitting reduced oxygen extraction in the gastrocnemius muscles due to reduced oxygen supply to capillaries and increased distance between capillaries and myocytes. However, leg fidgeting alleviated this effect in healthy young males.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>UMIN000050531 (March 8, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05613-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Oxygen extraction in skeletal muscle is an important determinant of exercise tolerance. Prolonged sitting decreases oxygen extraction in the gastrocnemius muscle. However, the underlying mechanism remains unknown, and preventive measures are yet to be established. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism by which prolonged sitting decreased muscle oxygen extraction and investigate preventive measures.

Methods: Ten healthy young males (age 21.2 ± 0.4 years; body mass index, 20.5 ± 1.3 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to each of the following conditions: 3-h supine (CON), 3-h sitting (SIT), and 3-h fidgeting of one lower leg during sitting (FID). Oxygen extraction from the gastrocnemius muscle was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy and the vascular occlusion test under each condition. The rate of change in total Hb + Mb (THb) was measured as an indicator of venous stasis and interstitial fluid accumulation in the lower leg.

Results: Muscle oxygen extraction was significantly lower at 180 min for SIT and FID than for CON (4384.2 ± 1426.8; 5281.5 ± 1823.7; 6517.4 ± 1390.8 a.u., respectively) and significantly higher for FID than for SIT (5281.5 ± 1823.7 vs. 4384.2 ± 1426.8 a.u., respectively). The rate of THb change was significantly higher at 180 min for SIT than for CON and FID (12.9 ± 15.1; -2.3 ± 5.7; 2.2 ± 11.6%, respectively). However, no significant difference was observed between CON and FID.

Conclusion: We found that 3-h prolonged sitting reduced oxygen extraction in the gastrocnemius muscles due to reduced oxygen supply to capillaries and increased distance between capillaries and myocytes. However, leg fidgeting alleviated this effect in healthy young males.

Trial registration number: UMIN000050531 (March 8, 2023).

腿部躁动可缓解久坐导致的腓肠肌氧气汲取减少:一项随机交叉试验。
目的:骨骼肌的氧气萃取是运动耐受性的重要决定因素。久坐会降低腓肠肌的氧气萃取率。然而,其根本机制仍不清楚,预防措施也尚未确立。因此,我们旨在阐明久坐降低肌肉氧萃取的机制,并研究预防措施:十名健康的年轻男性(年龄 21.2 ± 0.4 岁;体重指数 20.5 ± 1.3 kg/m2)被随机分配到以下条件中:3小时仰卧(CON)、3小时坐位(SIT)和3小时坐位时单侧小腿躁动(FID)。在每种条件下,使用近红外光谱和血管闭塞试验测量腓肠肌的吸氧量。总血红蛋白+Mb(THb)的变化率被测定为小腿静脉淤血和间质积液的指标:结果:180 分钟时,SIT 和 FID 的肌肉氧萃取率明显低于 CON(分别为 4384.2 ± 1426.8;5281.5 ± 1823.7;6517.4 ± 1390.8 a.u.),而 FID 则明显高于 SIT(分别为 5281.5 ± 1823.7 vs. 4384.2 ± 1426.8 a.u.)。在 180 分钟时,SIT 的 THb 变化率明显高于 CON 和 FID(分别为 12.9 ± 15.1;-2.3 ± 5.7;2.2 ± 11.6%)。然而,在 CON 和 FID 之间未观察到明显差异:我们发现,由于毛细血管供氧减少以及毛细血管与肌细胞之间的距离增加,久坐 3 小时会降低腓肠肌的氧萃取率。然而,在健康的年轻男性中,腿部躁动可减轻这种影响:UMIN000050531(2023 年 3 月 8 日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信