Effects of chia (Salvia hispanica. L) on anthropometric measures and other cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Sevil Kiani , Sina Naghshi , Maryam Saghafi-Asl
{"title":"Effects of chia (Salvia hispanica. L) on anthropometric measures and other cardiometabolic risk factors: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis","authors":"Sevil Kiani ,&nbsp;Sina Naghshi ,&nbsp;Maryam Saghafi-Asl","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Findings of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of chia are inconsistent. Although previous meta-analyses summarized available findings in this regard, some limitations may distort their findings. Moreover, none of these meta-analyses examined the dose-response association of chia on cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs). Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of chia consumption on CMRFs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Relevant RCTs were included by searching the ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases up to June 2, 2023. Mean differences (MD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten publications were included in this systematic review and the meta-analysis. The results showed a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = -7.87 mmHg; 95 % CI: − 12.92 to − 2.82; I<sup>2</sup> = 71.3 %, P <sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.004), diastolic blood pressure (MD = -6.33 mmHg; 95 %CI: − 7.33 to − 5.34, I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %, P <sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.42) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) (MD = -4.09 mg/dl; 95 %CI: − 6.76 to − 1.43, I<sup>2</sup> = 12.4 %, P <sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.33). However, the effects of chia on the other risk factors were not significant. Based on the dose-response analysis, a 10-g/d increase in chia consumption significantly reduced SBP (MD = -2.20 mmHg; 95 %CI: − 3.75 to − 0.66, I<sup>2</sup> = 78.9 %, P <sub>heterogeneity</sub> &lt; 0.001) and HDL-c (MD = -1.10 mg/dl; 95 %CI: − 1.72 to − 0.49, I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %, P <sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.52).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Chia consumption might have a beneficial effect on lowering blood pressure. Chia consumption can also lead to a slight reduction in HDL-c levels. As the quality of the included studies was mostly low, the findings should be interpreted with caution. Well-designed trials with larger sample sizes and longer duration of follow-up are needed to provide additional insight into the dose-dependent effects of chia consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Findings of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of chia are inconsistent. Although previous meta-analyses summarized available findings in this regard, some limitations may distort their findings. Moreover, none of these meta-analyses examined the dose-response association of chia on cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs). Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of chia consumption on CMRFs.

Methods

Relevant RCTs were included by searching the ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases up to June 2, 2023. Mean differences (MD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using random-effects model.

Results

Ten publications were included in this systematic review and the meta-analysis. The results showed a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD = -7.87 mmHg; 95 % CI: − 12.92 to − 2.82; I2 = 71.3 %, P heterogeneity = 0.004), diastolic blood pressure (MD = -6.33 mmHg; 95 %CI: − 7.33 to − 5.34, I2 = 0 %, P heterogeneity = 0.42) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) (MD = -4.09 mg/dl; 95 %CI: − 6.76 to − 1.43, I2 = 12.4 %, P heterogeneity = 0.33). However, the effects of chia on the other risk factors were not significant. Based on the dose-response analysis, a 10-g/d increase in chia consumption significantly reduced SBP (MD = -2.20 mmHg; 95 %CI: − 3.75 to − 0.66, I2 = 78.9 %, P heterogeneity < 0.001) and HDL-c (MD = -1.10 mg/dl; 95 %CI: − 1.72 to − 0.49, I2 = 0 %, P heterogeneity = 0.52).

Conclusion

Chia consumption might have a beneficial effect on lowering blood pressure. Chia consumption can also lead to a slight reduction in HDL-c levels. As the quality of the included studies was mostly low, the findings should be interpreted with caution. Well-designed trials with larger sample sizes and longer duration of follow-up are needed to provide additional insight into the dose-dependent effects of chia consumption.
奇异果(salvia hispanica. L)对人体测量指标和其他心脏代谢风险因素的影响:系统综述和剂量反应荟萃分析。
背景:现有的随机对照试验(RCT)对奇异果功效的研究结果并不一致。尽管以前的荟萃分析总结了这方面的现有研究结果,但一些局限性可能会扭曲研究结果。此外,这些荟萃分析都没有研究奇异果对心脏代谢风险因素(CMRFs)的剂量反应关系。因此,本研究旨在评估食用奇异果对 CMRFs 的影响:方法:通过检索 ISI Web of Science、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库,纳入截至 2023 年 6 月 2 日的相关 RCT。采用随机效应模型对平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)进行汇总:本系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入了 10 篇文献。结果显示,收缩压(SBP)(MD=-7.87mmHg;95% CI:-12.92 至-2.82;I2 =71.3%,P 异质性 =0.004)、舒张压(MD=-6.33mmHg;95%CI:-7.33至-5.34,I2=0%,P异质性=0.42)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-c)(MD=-4.09mg/dl;95%CI:-6.76至-1.43,I2=12.4%,P异质性=0.33)。然而,奇异果对其他风险因素的影响并不显著。根据剂量-反应分析,每增加10克/天的奇异果摄入量可显著降低SBP(MD=-2.20毫米汞柱;95%CI:-3.75至-0.66,I2=78.9%,P异质性2=0%,P异质性=0.52):结论:食用奇异果可能对降低血压有益。结论:食用奇异果可能对降低血压有益,也会导致高密度脂蛋白-c水平略有下降。由于纳入研究的质量大多较低,因此应谨慎解释研究结果。要进一步了解食用奇异果的剂量依赖效应,还需要进行设计合理、样本量更大、随访时间更长的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信