Structured respiratory physiotherapy protocol for resolution of atelectasis in pediatric intensive care.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clinics Pub Date : 2024-09-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100494
Patrícia Aparecida Silva Camassuti, Cíntia Johnston, Werther Brunow de Carvalho, Michele Luglio, Orlei Ribeiro de Araújo, Brenda Morrow
{"title":"Structured respiratory physiotherapy protocol for resolution of atelectasis in pediatric intensive care.","authors":"Patrícia Aparecida Silva Camassuti, Cíntia Johnston, Werther Brunow de Carvalho, Michele Luglio, Orlei Ribeiro de Araújo, Brenda Morrow","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children are at higher risk of atelectasis due to their anatomical and physiological particularities. Several physiotherapy techniques are used to treat atelectasis, but only four studies cite methods in pediatric patients undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV). The objective of this study was to evaluate the Structured Respiratory Physiotherapy Protocol (SRPP) for airway clearance and lung reexpansion for infants on IMV with atelectasis. This is a prospective study including 30 infants (mean ± standard deviation age 8.9 ± 8.0 months; weight 7.5 ± 3.0 kg; BMI 15.8 ± 1.6 kg/cm<sup>2</sup> and IMV duration 7.7 ± 4.3 days). The sample was randomized into a Control Group (CG), which received routine physiotherapy, and an Intervention Group (IG), submitted to SRPP (postural drainage, mechanical thoracic vibration, manual hyperinflation, stretching of the accessory respiratory muscles, and functional positioning). Both groups were evaluated before and after physiotherapy for respiratory effort using the Wood Downes Score (WD) and pulmonary aeration using lung ultrasonography (Lung Ultrasound Score ‒ LUS). The outcome of the intervention was evaluated by the magnitude of the effect by the Hedges' g test [(small (0.2 < Hedges' g < 0.5), moderate (0.5 < Hedges' g < 0.8) and large (Hedges' g > 0.8) effects]. There were large within-group effects on the reduction of WD in the CG after intervention in both the CG (Hedges' g = -1.53) and IG (Hedges' g = -2.2). There was a moderate effect on LUS reduction in the CG (Hedges' g = -0.64) and a large effect on IG (Hedges' g = -1.88). This study has shown that the SRPP appears to be safe and may be effective in improving airway clearance and lung reexpansion in children on IMV with atelectasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":"79 ","pages":"100494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children are at higher risk of atelectasis due to their anatomical and physiological particularities. Several physiotherapy techniques are used to treat atelectasis, but only four studies cite methods in pediatric patients undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV). The objective of this study was to evaluate the Structured Respiratory Physiotherapy Protocol (SRPP) for airway clearance and lung reexpansion for infants on IMV with atelectasis. This is a prospective study including 30 infants (mean ± standard deviation age 8.9 ± 8.0 months; weight 7.5 ± 3.0 kg; BMI 15.8 ± 1.6 kg/cm2 and IMV duration 7.7 ± 4.3 days). The sample was randomized into a Control Group (CG), which received routine physiotherapy, and an Intervention Group (IG), submitted to SRPP (postural drainage, mechanical thoracic vibration, manual hyperinflation, stretching of the accessory respiratory muscles, and functional positioning). Both groups were evaluated before and after physiotherapy for respiratory effort using the Wood Downes Score (WD) and pulmonary aeration using lung ultrasonography (Lung Ultrasound Score ‒ LUS). The outcome of the intervention was evaluated by the magnitude of the effect by the Hedges' g test [(small (0.2 < Hedges' g < 0.5), moderate (0.5 < Hedges' g < 0.8) and large (Hedges' g > 0.8) effects]. There were large within-group effects on the reduction of WD in the CG after intervention in both the CG (Hedges' g = -1.53) and IG (Hedges' g = -2.2). There was a moderate effect on LUS reduction in the CG (Hedges' g = -0.64) and a large effect on IG (Hedges' g = -1.88). This study has shown that the SRPP appears to be safe and may be effective in improving airway clearance and lung reexpansion in children on IMV with atelectasis.

用于解决儿科重症监护中肺不张的结构化呼吸理疗方案。
由于解剖和生理上的特殊性,儿童发生肺不张的风险较高。目前有多种物理治疗技术可用于治疗肺不张,但只有四项研究引用了针对接受有创机械通气(IMV)的儿童患者的方法。本研究的目的是评估结构化呼吸理疗方案(SRPP)对接受有创机械通气的肺不张婴儿进行气道清理和肺再扩张的效果。这是一项前瞻性研究,包括 30 名婴儿(平均年龄为 8.9 ± 8.0 个月;体重为 7.5 ± 3.0 千克;体重指数为 15.8 ± 1.6 千克/平方厘米;IMV 持续时间为 7.7 ± 4.3 天)。样本被随机分为对照组(CG)和干预组(IG),对照组接受常规物理治疗,干预组接受 SRPP(体位引流、胸廓机械振动、手动过度充气、呼吸辅助肌拉伸和功能性定位)治疗。物理治疗前后,两组患者均使用伍德-唐斯评分(WD)对呼吸强度进行评估,并使用肺部超声波检查(肺部超声波评分 - LUS)对肺通气情况进行评估。干预结果通过赫奇斯g检验[(小影响(0.2 < 赫奇斯g < 0.5)、中影响(0.5 < 赫奇斯g < 0.8)和大影响(赫奇斯g > 0.8)]的效果大小进行评估。干预后,CG(海德斯氏 g =-1.53)和 IG(海德斯氏 g =-2.2)组内对减少 CG 的 WD 均有较大影响。在 CG 中,对 LUS 的减少有中等程度的影响(Hedges' g = -0.64),而在 IG 中则有较大影响(Hedges' g =-1.88)。这项研究表明,SRPP 似乎是安全的,而且可以有效改善患有肺不张的 IMV 患儿的气道通畅和肺再扩张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信