{"title":"[Long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a non-university teaching hospital].","authors":"Konstantinos Drosos, Karsten Fischer, Ines Hofmann, Tilmann Kälble","doi":"10.1055/a-2377-9339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evaluation of oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a major component of quality control in prostate cancer (PCa) centres.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the oncological outcomes after RP in a non-university teaching hospital and compare them with other high-volume PCa centres.</p><p><strong>Material und methods: </strong>This study included 1,161 patients after RP who were divided into two risk groups. Low-risk: localised PCa (pT2) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)≤ 20 ng/ml, Gleason score (GS) 6-7b and pN0. High-risk: locally advanced PCa (≥pT3a) and/or PSA >20 ng/ml and/or GS≥ 8 and/or pN1. Risk groups and clinicopathological features were correlated to biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) und overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 10-year BCR-free survival, CSS und OS were 68.4%, 47.0% and 100% in the low-risk group and 87.4%, 89.0% and 73.9% in the high-risk group, respectively; the outcomes between risk groups were statistically significant (p<0.05). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. GS was the most significant prognostic factor for CSS (p=0.00001) und BCR-free survival (p=0.00036). Nodal involvement (pN1) was strongly associated with CSS (p=0.00004). Age was the most important factor for overall survival in the high-risk group (p=0.0011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RP could be a curative treatment option for advanced PCa in selected cases. GS is the most important prognostic factor. Good oncological outcomes can also be achieved in non-university teaching hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7513,"journal":{"name":"Aktuelle Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktuelle Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2377-9339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The evaluation of oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a major component of quality control in prostate cancer (PCa) centres.
Objectives: To evaluate the oncological outcomes after RP in a non-university teaching hospital and compare them with other high-volume PCa centres.
Material und methods: This study included 1,161 patients after RP who were divided into two risk groups. Low-risk: localised PCa (pT2) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)≤ 20 ng/ml, Gleason score (GS) 6-7b and pN0. High-risk: locally advanced PCa (≥pT3a) and/or PSA >20 ng/ml and/or GS≥ 8 and/or pN1. Risk groups and clinicopathological features were correlated to biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS) und overall survival (OS).
Results: The 10-year BCR-free survival, CSS und OS were 68.4%, 47.0% and 100% in the low-risk group and 87.4%, 89.0% and 73.9% in the high-risk group, respectively; the outcomes between risk groups were statistically significant (p<0.05). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed. GS was the most significant prognostic factor for CSS (p=0.00001) und BCR-free survival (p=0.00036). Nodal involvement (pN1) was strongly associated with CSS (p=0.00004). Age was the most important factor for overall survival in the high-risk group (p=0.0011).
Conclusions: RP could be a curative treatment option for advanced PCa in selected cases. GS is the most important prognostic factor. Good oncological outcomes can also be achieved in non-university teaching hospitals.
期刊介绍:
Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung – für Sie auf den Punkt zusammengefasst und kritisch kommentiert
Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis
Auf dem Laufenden über die klinische Forschung durch interessante Originalien
CME-Punkte sammeln mit der Rubrik "Operative Techniken"
In jeder Ausgabe: Techniken wichtiger Standard-OPs – Schritt für Schritt
Erstklassige OP-Skizzen mit verständlichen Erläuterungen