Predicting postoperative prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using a multiphase CT-based deep learning model.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Changyin Yao, Bao Feng, Shurong Li, Fan Lin, Changyi Ma, Jin Cui, Yu Liu, Ximiao Wang, Enming Cui
{"title":"Predicting postoperative prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using a multiphase CT-based deep learning model.","authors":"Changyin Yao, Bao Feng, Shurong Li, Fan Lin, Changyi Ma, Jin Cui, Yu Liu, Ximiao Wang, Enming Cui","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04593-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some clinicopathological risk stratification systems (CRSSs) such as the leibovich score have been used to predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but there are no reliable noninvasive preoperative indicators for predicting postoperative prognosis in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the value of a deep learning (DL) model based on CT images in predicting the postoperative prognosis of patients with ccRCC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 382 patients with ccRCC were retrospectively enrolled andallocated to training (n = 229) or testing (n = 153) cohorts at a 6:4 ratio. The features were extracted from precontrast-phase (PCP), corticomedullary-phase (CMP) and nephrographic-phase (NP) CT images with ResNet50, and then extreme learning machines (ELMs) were used to construct classification models. The DL model and Leibovich score were compared and combined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with other single-phase DL models, the three-phase CT-based DL model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839. Combining the three-phase DL model and the Leibovich score (AUC = 0.823) into a nomogram (AUC = 0.888) statistically improved performance (IDI<sub>Nomogram vs. Three-phase</sub> = 0.1358, IDI<sub>Nomogram vs. Leibovich</sub> = 0.1393, [Formula: see text]< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CT-based DL model could be valuable for preoperatively predicting the prognosis of patients with ccRCC, and combining it with the Leibovich score can further improve its predictive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04593-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some clinicopathological risk stratification systems (CRSSs) such as the leibovich score have been used to predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but there are no reliable noninvasive preoperative indicators for predicting postoperative prognosis in clinical practice.

Purpose: To assess the value of a deep learning (DL) model based on CT images in predicting the postoperative prognosis of patients with ccRCC.

Materials and methods: A total of 382 patients with ccRCC were retrospectively enrolled andallocated to training (n = 229) or testing (n = 153) cohorts at a 6:4 ratio. The features were extracted from precontrast-phase (PCP), corticomedullary-phase (CMP) and nephrographic-phase (NP) CT images with ResNet50, and then extreme learning machines (ELMs) were used to construct classification models. The DL model and Leibovich score were compared and combined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate model performance.

Results: Compared with other single-phase DL models, the three-phase CT-based DL model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839. Combining the three-phase DL model and the Leibovich score (AUC = 0.823) into a nomogram (AUC = 0.888) statistically improved performance (IDINomogram vs. Three-phase = 0.1358, IDINomogram vs. Leibovich = 0.1393, [Formula: see text]< 0.001).

Conclusion: The CT-based DL model could be valuable for preoperatively predicting the prognosis of patients with ccRCC, and combining it with the Leibovich score can further improve its predictive performance.

利用基于多相 CT 的深度学习模型预测透明细胞肾细胞癌的术后预后。
背景:目的:评估基于CT图像的深度学习(DL)模型在预测ccRCC患者术后预后方面的价值:回顾性入组 382 例 ccRCC 患者,按 6:4 的比例分配到训练组(229 例)或测试组(153 例)。使用 ResNet50 从对比前期(PCP)、皮质髓质期(CMP)和肾造影期(NP)CT 图像中提取特征,然后使用极端学习机(ELM)构建分类模型。对 DL 模型和莱博维奇评分进行了比较和合并。使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)和综合判别改进(IDI)来评估模型的性能:结果:与其他单相 DL 模型相比,基于 CT 的三相 DL 模型性能最佳,其曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.839。将三相 DL 模型和莱博维奇评分(AUC = 0.823)组合成一个提名图(AUC = 0.888),在统计学上提高了性能(IDINomogram vs. 三相 = 0.1358,IDINomogram vs. 莱博维奇 = 0.1393,[公式:见正文]< 0.001):结论:基于CT的DL模型可用于术前预测ccRCC患者的预后,将其与Leibovich评分相结合可进一步提高其预测性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信