Transcranial direct current stimulation on hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Edson Silva-Filho, Quênia Gramile Silva Meira, Ayrlla Da Costa Rodrigues, Camille Louise Fontes Marques, Paloma Oliveira, Rodrigo Pegado
{"title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation on hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Edson Silva-Filho, Quênia Gramile Silva Meira, Ayrlla Da Costa Rodrigues, Camille Louise Fontes Marques, Paloma Oliveira, Rodrigo Pegado","doi":"10.1080/00015385.2024.2403925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Hypertension is a clinical condition that presents an enormous prevalence worldwide. Despite there being gold-standard treatments, several people frequently present sequelae and die. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) emerges as a cheap, easy-to-use, and portable intervention to modulate the central nervous system and control cardiovascular parameters. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the tDCS effects on the hemodynamic and autonomic parameters of hypertensive people. <b>Methods:</b> This systematic review included clinical trials published in databases that used tDCS as an intervention, isolated or associated, in hypertensive people to modulate the hemodynamic and autonomic parameters. We calculated the effect sizes, performed a meta-analysis, and evaluated the risk of bias in the studies. Three different researchers performed all the steps presented in the methods section. <b>Results:</b> Four studies suited the eligibility criteria of this review. Some studies showed that tDCS isolated after one session generated improvements in hemodynamic and autonomic parameters. Despite in meta-analysis, no statistical differences were detected between the groups, there was a tendency to reduce systolic (MD: -0.72 (CI: -1.54; 0.11; <i>p</i> = 0.06) and diastolic blood pressure (MD: -1.23; CI: -3.45; 0.99; <i>p</i> < 0.01), and root mean square of successive differences (MD: 0.73; CI: -0.30; 1.76; <i>p</i> < 0.01). There was no statistical difference after ten tDCS sessions. All the studies presented a low risk of bias. <b>Conclusion:</b> After one session, isolated tDCS might be able to modulate hypertensive people's hemodynamic and autonomic parameters. The anodic stimulation over the primary motor cortex shows signs of being the best target to generate a response.</p>","PeriodicalId":6979,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cardiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2024.2403925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a clinical condition that presents an enormous prevalence worldwide. Despite there being gold-standard treatments, several people frequently present sequelae and die. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) emerges as a cheap, easy-to-use, and portable intervention to modulate the central nervous system and control cardiovascular parameters. Objective: To evaluate the tDCS effects on the hemodynamic and autonomic parameters of hypertensive people. Methods: This systematic review included clinical trials published in databases that used tDCS as an intervention, isolated or associated, in hypertensive people to modulate the hemodynamic and autonomic parameters. We calculated the effect sizes, performed a meta-analysis, and evaluated the risk of bias in the studies. Three different researchers performed all the steps presented in the methods section. Results: Four studies suited the eligibility criteria of this review. Some studies showed that tDCS isolated after one session generated improvements in hemodynamic and autonomic parameters. Despite in meta-analysis, no statistical differences were detected between the groups, there was a tendency to reduce systolic (MD: -0.72 (CI: -1.54; 0.11; p = 0.06) and diastolic blood pressure (MD: -1.23; CI: -3.45; 0.99; p < 0.01), and root mean square of successive differences (MD: 0.73; CI: -0.30; 1.76; p < 0.01). There was no statistical difference after ten tDCS sessions. All the studies presented a low risk of bias. Conclusion: After one session, isolated tDCS might be able to modulate hypertensive people's hemodynamic and autonomic parameters. The anodic stimulation over the primary motor cortex shows signs of being the best target to generate a response.

经颅直流电刺激对高血压的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:高血压是全球发病率极高的一种临床疾病。尽管有黄金标准的治疗方法,但仍有一些人经常出现后遗症和死亡。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作为一种廉价、易用、便携的干预手段出现,可调节中枢神经系统并控制心血管参数。目的:评估经颅直流电刺激对中枢神经系统和心血管参数的影响:评估经颅直流电刺激对高血压患者血液动力学和自主神经参数的影响。方法:本系统性综述收录了数据库中发表的临床试验,这些试验使用 tDCS 作为干预措施,对高血压患者进行单独或联合干预,以调节血液动力学和自律神经参数。我们计算了效应大小,进行了荟萃分析,并评估了研究的偏倚风险。三位不同的研究人员完成了方法部分介绍的所有步骤。结果四项研究符合本综述的资格标准。一些研究表明,经过一次治疗后分离的 tDCS 可改善血液动力学和自律神经参数。尽管在荟萃分析中未发现组间存在统计学差异,但有降低收缩压(MD:-0.72;CI:-1.54;0.11;p = 0.06)和舒张压(MD:-1.23;CI:-3.45;0.99;p p p 结论:经过一次治疗后,孤立的 tDCS 可能能够调节高血压患者的血液动力学和自律神经参数。对初级运动皮层的阳极刺激显示出是产生反应的最佳目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta cardiologica
Acta cardiologica 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
115
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Cardiologica is an international journal. It publishes bi-monthly original, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease including observational studies, clinical trials, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance and tutorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信