Spatial multi-criteria approaches for estimating geogenic radon hazard index.

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-15 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176419
Iman Masoumi, Sabrina Maggio, Sandra De Iaco, Reza Ghezelbash
{"title":"Spatial multi-criteria approaches for estimating geogenic radon hazard index.","authors":"Iman Masoumi, Sabrina Maggio, Sandra De Iaco, Reza Ghezelbash","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The geogenic radon hazard index (GRHI) map plays a crucial role in evaluating radon exposure risks. The construction of this map requires a comprehensive analysis of radon levels in soil gas and some critical factors, such as uranium content in bedrock, soil permeability, and geological inhomogeneities. In this context, the spatial multi-criteria decision analysis is proposed with the aim of combining various key geological parameters and identifying high-potential radon areas. In particular, the multivariate integration involves the fuzzy gamma operator method and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making technique, namely AHP-TOPSIS, which represents a novel approach in GRHI mapping. Thus, a comparison is provided through the definition of the GRHI maps of an unexplored study area, that is the Apulia region, located in Southern Italy. In order to evaluate the output maps, high radon potential areas are identified based on some available indoor radon measurement data. The success-rate curve, as a valid evaluation metric, is employed for the performance assessment and comparison of these two methods. The results demonstrate that although both generated GRHI maps are closely correlated with high-potential radon zones, the hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method is preferable.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"176419"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176419","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The geogenic radon hazard index (GRHI) map plays a crucial role in evaluating radon exposure risks. The construction of this map requires a comprehensive analysis of radon levels in soil gas and some critical factors, such as uranium content in bedrock, soil permeability, and geological inhomogeneities. In this context, the spatial multi-criteria decision analysis is proposed with the aim of combining various key geological parameters and identifying high-potential radon areas. In particular, the multivariate integration involves the fuzzy gamma operator method and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making technique, namely AHP-TOPSIS, which represents a novel approach in GRHI mapping. Thus, a comparison is provided through the definition of the GRHI maps of an unexplored study area, that is the Apulia region, located in Southern Italy. In order to evaluate the output maps, high radon potential areas are identified based on some available indoor radon measurement data. The success-rate curve, as a valid evaluation metric, is employed for the performance assessment and comparison of these two methods. The results demonstrate that although both generated GRHI maps are closely correlated with high-potential radon zones, the hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method is preferable.

估算地质氡危害指数的空间多标准方法。
地质氡危害指数(GRHI)地图在评估氡暴露风险方面起着至关重要的作用。构建该地图需要对土壤气体中的氡含量以及一些关键因素(如基岩中的铀含量、土壤渗透性和地质不均匀性)进行综合分析。在此背景下,提出了空间多标准决策分析,以整合基于 GRHI 的标准来识别高氡潜力区域。特别是,多元整合涉及模糊伽马算子和混合多标准决策技术,即 AHP-TOPSIS,这是 GRHI 地图绘制中的一种新方法。因此,通过定义一个未开发研究区域(即位于意大利南部的阿普利亚地区)的 GRHI 地图进行了比较。为了评估输出地图,根据一些可用的室内氡测量数据确定了高氡潜在区域。成功率曲线作为一种有效的评价指标,被用于这两种方法的性能评估和比较。结果表明,尽管两种方法生成的 GRHI 地图都与阿普利亚的高氡潜能区密切相关,但 AHP-TOPSIS 混合方法在识别高氡潜能区方面更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信