Phosphorus limitation promotes soil carbon storage in a boreal forest exposed to long-term nitrogen fertilization

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Etienne Richy, Tania Fort, Inaki Odriozola, Petr Kohout, Florian Barbi, Tijana Martinovic, Boris Tupek, Bartosz Adamczyk, Aleksi Lehtonen, Raisa Mäkipää, Petr Baldrian
{"title":"Phosphorus limitation promotes soil carbon storage in a boreal forest exposed to long-term nitrogen fertilization","authors":"Etienne Richy,&nbsp;Tania Fort,&nbsp;Inaki Odriozola,&nbsp;Petr Kohout,&nbsp;Florian Barbi,&nbsp;Tijana Martinovic,&nbsp;Boris Tupek,&nbsp;Bartosz Adamczyk,&nbsp;Aleksi Lehtonen,&nbsp;Raisa Mäkipää,&nbsp;Petr Baldrian","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forests play a crucial role in global carbon cycling by absorbing and storing significant amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Although boreal forests contribute to approximately 45% of the total forest carbon sink, tree growth and soil carbon sequestration are constrained by nutrient availability. Here, we examine if long-term nutrient input enhances tree productivity and whether this leads to carbon storage or whether stimulated microbial decomposition of organic matter limits soil carbon accumulation. Over six decades, nitrogen, phosphorus, and calcium were supplied to a <i>Pinus sylvestris</i>-dominated boreal forest. We found that nitrogen fertilization alone or together with calcium and/or phosphorus increased tree biomass production by 50% and soil carbon sequestration by 65% compared to unfertilized plots. However, the nonlinear relationship observed between tree productivity and soil carbon stock across treatments suggests microbial regulation. When phosphorus was co-applied with nitrogen, it acidified the soil, increased fungal biomass, altered microbial community composition, and enhanced biopolymer degradation capabilities. While no evidence of competition between ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi has been observed, key functional groups with the potential to reduce carbon stocks were identified. In contrast, when nitrogen was added without phosphorus, it increased soil carbon sequestration because microbial activity was likely limited by phosphorus availability. In conclusion, the addition of nitrogen to boreal forests may contribute to global warming mitigation, but this effect is context dependent.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.17516","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17516","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forests play a crucial role in global carbon cycling by absorbing and storing significant amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Although boreal forests contribute to approximately 45% of the total forest carbon sink, tree growth and soil carbon sequestration are constrained by nutrient availability. Here, we examine if long-term nutrient input enhances tree productivity and whether this leads to carbon storage or whether stimulated microbial decomposition of organic matter limits soil carbon accumulation. Over six decades, nitrogen, phosphorus, and calcium were supplied to a Pinus sylvestris-dominated boreal forest. We found that nitrogen fertilization alone or together with calcium and/or phosphorus increased tree biomass production by 50% and soil carbon sequestration by 65% compared to unfertilized plots. However, the nonlinear relationship observed between tree productivity and soil carbon stock across treatments suggests microbial regulation. When phosphorus was co-applied with nitrogen, it acidified the soil, increased fungal biomass, altered microbial community composition, and enhanced biopolymer degradation capabilities. While no evidence of competition between ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi has been observed, key functional groups with the potential to reduce carbon stocks were identified. In contrast, when nitrogen was added without phosphorus, it increased soil carbon sequestration because microbial activity was likely limited by phosphorus availability. In conclusion, the addition of nitrogen to boreal forests may contribute to global warming mitigation, but this effect is context dependent.

Abstract Image

磷限制促进了长期施用氮肥的北方森林的土壤碳储存。
森林通过吸收和储存大量大气二氧化碳,在全球碳循环中发挥着至关重要的作用。虽然北方森林约占森林碳汇总量的 45%,但树木生长和土壤固碳却受到养分供应的限制。在这里,我们研究了长期的养分输入是否会提高树木的生产力,以及这是否会导致碳储存,或者受刺激的微生物对有机物的分解是否会限制土壤碳的积累。在过去的六十年中,我们向以欧洲赤松为主的北方森林提供了氮、磷和钙。我们发现,与未施肥地块相比,单独施氮肥或同时施钙和/或磷肥可使树木生物量增加 50%,土壤固碳量增加 65%。然而,在不同处理中观察到的树木生产力和土壤碳储量之间的非线性关系表明存在微生物调节。当磷与氮同时施用时,会酸化土壤,增加真菌生物量,改变微生物群落组成,并增强生物聚合物降解能力。虽然没有证据表明外生真菌和嗜渍真菌之间存在竞争,但却发现了有可能减少碳储量的关键功能群。相反,在不添加磷的情况下添加氮时,由于微生物活动可能受到磷供应的限制,因此增加了土壤固碳量。总之,在北方森林中添加氮可能有助于减缓全球变暖,但这种效果取决于具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信