The association between state cannabis policies and cannabis use among adults and youth, United States, 2002-2019.

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1111/add.16663
Seema Choksy Pessar, Rosanna Smart, Tim Naimi, Marlene Lira, Jason Blanchette, Anne Boustead, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
{"title":"The association between state cannabis policies and cannabis use among adults and youth, United States, 2002-2019.","authors":"Seema Choksy Pessar, Rosanna Smart, Tim Naimi, Marlene Lira, Jason Blanchette, Anne Boustead, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula","doi":"10.1111/add.16663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To measure the association between state cannabis policies and use among adults and youth in the United States from 2002 to 2019, given rapid policy liberalization and complex state cannabis policy environments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional time series analysis. Three sets of models assessed the linear association between the Cannabis Policy Scale (CPS), an aggregate measure of 17 state cannabis policy areas that weights each policy by its efficacy and implementation rating, and prevalence of cannabis use. The first included year and state fixed effects; the second added state-level controls; the third replaced state fixed effects with state random effects. Standard errors were clustered at the state level in all models.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>United States.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Past-month prevalence of cannabis use is from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health Small Area Estimates, a nationally and state-representative cross-sectional survey of household population ages 12 and older for years 2002-2003 to 2018-2019. Exposure data include the CPS.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A 10 percentage-point increase in the CPS (i.e. greater cannabis policy restrictiveness) was associated with lower past-month use prevalence by 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.05 to -0.56) to 0.97 (95% CI = -1.19 to -0.75) percentage-points for the population ages 12 years and older. When models were stratified by age, a 10 percentage-point increase in the CPS was associated with a 0.87 (95% CI = -1.13 to -0.61) to 1.04 percentage-point (95% CI = -1.03 to -0.84) reduction in past-month use prevalence for adults ages 18 years and older, and a 0.17 (95% CI = -0.24 to -0.09) to 0.21 percentage-point (95% CI = -0.35 to -0.07) reduction for youth ages 12-17 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More restrictive US cannabis policies appear to be associated with reduced cannabis use for both adults and youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16663","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To measure the association between state cannabis policies and use among adults and youth in the United States from 2002 to 2019, given rapid policy liberalization and complex state cannabis policy environments.

Design: Repeated cross-sectional time series analysis. Three sets of models assessed the linear association between the Cannabis Policy Scale (CPS), an aggregate measure of 17 state cannabis policy areas that weights each policy by its efficacy and implementation rating, and prevalence of cannabis use. The first included year and state fixed effects; the second added state-level controls; the third replaced state fixed effects with state random effects. Standard errors were clustered at the state level in all models.

Setting and participants: United States.

Measurements: Past-month prevalence of cannabis use is from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health Small Area Estimates, a nationally and state-representative cross-sectional survey of household population ages 12 and older for years 2002-2003 to 2018-2019. Exposure data include the CPS.

Findings: A 10 percentage-point increase in the CPS (i.e. greater cannabis policy restrictiveness) was associated with lower past-month use prevalence by 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.05 to -0.56) to 0.97 (95% CI = -1.19 to -0.75) percentage-points for the population ages 12 years and older. When models were stratified by age, a 10 percentage-point increase in the CPS was associated with a 0.87 (95% CI = -1.13 to -0.61) to 1.04 percentage-point (95% CI = -1.03 to -0.84) reduction in past-month use prevalence for adults ages 18 years and older, and a 0.17 (95% CI = -0.24 to -0.09) to 0.21 percentage-point (95% CI = -0.35 to -0.07) reduction for youth ages 12-17 years.

Conclusions: More restrictive US cannabis policies appear to be associated with reduced cannabis use for both adults and youth.

2002-2019 年美国各州大麻政策与成年人和青少年使用大麻情况之间的关联。
目的:在政策迅速自由化和各州大麻政策环境复杂的情况下,衡量 2002 年至 2019 年美国各州大麻政策与成年人和青少年使用情况之间的关联:设计:重复横截面时间序列分析。三组模型评估了大麻政策量表(CPS)与大麻使用流行率之间的线性关系,大麻政策量表是对 17 个州大麻政策领域的综合衡量,通过对每项政策的有效性和实施情况进行评级来加权。第一个模型包括年份和州的固定效应;第二个模型增加了州一级的控制;第三个模型用州的随机效应取代了州的固定效应。在所有模型中,标准误差均以州为单位进行聚类:美国:上月大麻使用流行率来自《全国毒品使用和健康调查小地区估计》,该调查是 2002-2003 年至 2018-2019 年期间对 12 岁及以上家庭人口进行的具有全国和州代表性的横截面调查。暴露数据包括 CPS.Findings:在 12 岁及以上人口中,CPS 增加 10 个百分点(即大麻政策限制性增加)与上月使用流行率降低 0.81(95% 置信区间 [CI] = -1.05 至 -0.56)至 0.97(95% CI = -1.19 至 -0.75)个百分点相关。当模型按年龄分层时,CPS 每增加 10 个百分点,18 岁及以上成年人上月使用率就会下降 0.87 个百分点(95% CI = -1.13 至 -0.61)至 1.04 个百分点(95% CI = -1.03 至 -0.84),而 12-17 岁青少年上月使用率则会下降 0.17 个百分点(95% CI = -0.24 至 -0.09)至 0.21 个百分点(95% CI = -0.35 至 -0.07):结论:美国更严格的大麻政策似乎与成人和青少年大麻使用量的减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信