Differential growth, morphological characters, and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes grown on salt degraded soil

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Crop Science Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1002/csc2.21373
Mubbashir Gul, Nabeel Ahmad Ikram, Tasawer Abbas, Shahid Iqbal, Abid Hussain, Khurram Mubeen, Sami Ullah, Naila Farooq
{"title":"Differential growth, morphological characters, and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes grown on salt degraded soil","authors":"Mubbashir Gul,&nbsp;Nabeel Ahmad Ikram,&nbsp;Tasawer Abbas,&nbsp;Shahid Iqbal,&nbsp;Abid Hussain,&nbsp;Khurram Mubeen,&nbsp;Sami Ullah,&nbsp;Naila Farooq","doi":"10.1002/csc2.21373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i> Willd.), a high-value halophytic crop, is a promising candidate to ensure food security in the scenario of increasing soil salinization due to climate change. In a 2-year field study (during 2018–2019 and 2019–2020), 18 quinoa genotypes of different origins (Q-4, Q-6, Q-9, Q-7, Q11, Q-15, Q-22, Q-24, Q-27, Q-45, Q-50, Q-51, Q-52, Q-76, Q-81, Q82, Q-124, and Q-126) were grown at two different locations (salt-affected and normal soil having electrical conductivity (EC) of 16.24 and 1.76 dS m<sup>−1</sup>, respectively). Morphological, physiological, and yield parameters were recorded to assess the impact of salinity on different genotypes of quinoa. All the tested genotypes performed better in normal soil (37% more yield) than salt-affected soils. Under salt-affected conditions, differential salt tolerance responses of quinoa genotypes were observed. Among tested genotypes, Q-7 achieved the highest chlorophyll content index, biological mass (7905 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), and seed yield (1916 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) under salt-affected conditions, it was followed by Q-81. Salt stress caused up to 94% reduction of seed yield in the salt-sensitive genotype (Q-11), while the salt-tolerant genotype (Q-81) showed only 15% reduction in seed yield. Morphological characteristics of quinoa genotypes were differently influenced by salt stress. The salt-tolerant accessions Q-7 and Q-81 exhibited similar morphological characteristics. Based on the findings of this study, salt-tolerant quinoa genotypes can be successfully grown in salt-degraded soils (with EC ≤ 16.24 dS m<sup>−1</sup>) in extreme winter seasons with arid climatic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10849,"journal":{"name":"Crop Science","volume":"64 6","pages":"3572-3582"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csc2.21373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), a high-value halophytic crop, is a promising candidate to ensure food security in the scenario of increasing soil salinization due to climate change. In a 2-year field study (during 2018–2019 and 2019–2020), 18 quinoa genotypes of different origins (Q-4, Q-6, Q-9, Q-7, Q11, Q-15, Q-22, Q-24, Q-27, Q-45, Q-50, Q-51, Q-52, Q-76, Q-81, Q82, Q-124, and Q-126) were grown at two different locations (salt-affected and normal soil having electrical conductivity (EC) of 16.24 and 1.76 dS m−1, respectively). Morphological, physiological, and yield parameters were recorded to assess the impact of salinity on different genotypes of quinoa. All the tested genotypes performed better in normal soil (37% more yield) than salt-affected soils. Under salt-affected conditions, differential salt tolerance responses of quinoa genotypes were observed. Among tested genotypes, Q-7 achieved the highest chlorophyll content index, biological mass (7905 kg ha−1), and seed yield (1916 kg ha−1) under salt-affected conditions, it was followed by Q-81. Salt stress caused up to 94% reduction of seed yield in the salt-sensitive genotype (Q-11), while the salt-tolerant genotype (Q-81) showed only 15% reduction in seed yield. Morphological characteristics of quinoa genotypes were differently influenced by salt stress. The salt-tolerant accessions Q-7 and Q-81 exhibited similar morphological characteristics. Based on the findings of this study, salt-tolerant quinoa genotypes can be successfully grown in salt-degraded soils (with EC ≤ 16.24 dS m−1) in extreme winter seasons with arid climatic conditions.

盐碱地上生长的藜麦基因型的生长、形态特征和产量差异
藜麦(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)是一种高价值的卤代作物,在气候变化导致土壤盐碱化加剧的情况下,它是确保粮食安全的一种有前途的候选作物。在一项为期两年的田间研究(2018-2019年和2019-2020年)中,18个不同产地的藜麦基因型(Q-4、Q-6、Q-9、Q-7、Q11、Q-15、Q-22、Q-24、Q-27、Q-45、Q-50、Q-51、Q-52、Q-76、Q-81、Q82、Q-124和Q-126)被种植在两个不同的地点(导电率(EC)分别为16.24和1.76 dS m-1的盐害土壤和正常土壤)。记录了形态、生理和产量参数,以评估盐分对不同藜麦基因型的影响。与受盐分影响的土壤相比,所有受测基因型在正常土壤中的表现更好(产量提高 37%)。在受盐分影响的条件下,藜麦基因型的耐盐反应存在差异。在测试的基因型中,Q-7 在盐害条件下的叶绿素含量指数、生物量(7905 千克/公顷-1)和种子产量(1916 千克/公顷-1)最高,其次是 Q-81。盐胁迫导致对盐敏感的基因型(Q-11)的种子产量减少高达 94%,而耐盐基因型(Q-81)的种子产量仅减少 15%。藜麦基因型的形态特征受盐胁迫的影响不同。耐盐品种 Q-7 和 Q-81 表现出相似的形态特征。根据这项研究的结果,在冬季极端干旱的气候条件下,耐盐藜麦基因型可以成功地在盐渍化土壤(EC ≤ 16.24 dS m-1)中生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Science
Crop Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in Crop Science are of interest to researchers, policy makers, educators, and practitioners. The scope of articles in Crop Science includes crop breeding and genetics; crop physiology and metabolism; crop ecology, production, and management; seed physiology, production, and technology; turfgrass science; forage and grazing land ecology and management; genomics, molecular genetics, and biotechnology; germplasm collections and their use; and biomedical, health beneficial, and nutritionally enhanced plants. Crop Science publishes thematic collections of articles across its scope and includes topical Review and Interpretation, and Perspectives articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信