Effectiveness of janus kinase inhibitors compared with biologic disease modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs on pain reduction in rheumatoid arthritis

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Anna Eberhard, Daniela Di Giuseppe, Johan Askling, Stefan Bergman, Hannah Bower, Katerina Chatzidionysiou, Helena Forsblad‐d'Elia, Alf Kastbom, Tor Olofsson, Thomas Frisell, Carl Turesson
{"title":"Effectiveness of janus kinase inhibitors compared with biologic disease modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs on pain reduction in rheumatoid arthritis","authors":"Anna Eberhard, Daniela Di Giuseppe, Johan Askling, Stefan Bergman, Hannah Bower, Katerina Chatzidionysiou, Helena Forsblad‐d'Elia, Alf Kastbom, Tor Olofsson, Thomas Frisell, Carl Turesson","doi":"10.1002/art.43014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and biologic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn this retrospective study, we investigated patients with a diagnosis of RA, starting treatment with a JAKi (n=1827), TNF inhibitor (TNFi, n=6422), IL‐6 inhibitor (n=887), abatacept (n=1102) or rituximab (n=1149) in 2017‐2019, using data from several linked Swedish national registers. Differences in change in pain, assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0‐100 mm), from baseline to 3 months, as well as proportions of patients remaining on initial treatment with low pain (VAS pain <20) at 12 months, were compared between treatments. Comparisons of treatment responses between JAKis and bDMARDs were evaluated using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for patient characteristics, comorbidities, current co‐medication and previous treatment.ResultsJAKi treatment was associated with a greater decrease in pain at 3 months compared with TNFi treatment (adjusted mean additional decrease: 4.0 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6, 6.3), with similar trends in comparisons with non‐TNFi bDMARDs. More patients achieved low pain at 12 months on JAKis compared with TNFis, in particular among those previously treated with ≥2 bDMARDs (adjusted change contrast: 5.3 percentage points; 95% CI 1.0, 9.6).ConclusionJAKis had a slightly better effect on pain outcomes at 3 and 12 months compared with TNFis, with significantly greater differences in patients previously treated with ≥2 bDMARDs. The effect of JAKis on pain reduction was at least similar to that of non‐TNFi bDMARDs.","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.43014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and biologic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn this retrospective study, we investigated patients with a diagnosis of RA, starting treatment with a JAKi (n=1827), TNF inhibitor (TNFi, n=6422), IL‐6 inhibitor (n=887), abatacept (n=1102) or rituximab (n=1149) in 2017‐2019, using data from several linked Swedish national registers. Differences in change in pain, assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0‐100 mm), from baseline to 3 months, as well as proportions of patients remaining on initial treatment with low pain (VAS pain <20) at 12 months, were compared between treatments. Comparisons of treatment responses between JAKis and bDMARDs were evaluated using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for patient characteristics, comorbidities, current co‐medication and previous treatment.ResultsJAKi treatment was associated with a greater decrease in pain at 3 months compared with TNFi treatment (adjusted mean additional decrease: 4.0 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6, 6.3), with similar trends in comparisons with non‐TNFi bDMARDs. More patients achieved low pain at 12 months on JAKis compared with TNFis, in particular among those previously treated with ≥2 bDMARDs (adjusted change contrast: 5.3 percentage points; 95% CI 1.0, 9.6).ConclusionJAKis had a slightly better effect on pain outcomes at 3 and 12 months compared with TNFis, with significantly greater differences in patients previously treated with ≥2 bDMARDs. The effect of JAKis on pain reduction was at least similar to that of non‐TNFi bDMARDs.
类风湿性关节炎患者服用破伤风激酶抑制剂和生物制剂改变病情抗风湿药物对减轻疼痛的效果比较
目的比较Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKis)和生物改变病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)对类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者疼痛的疗效。方法在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了2017-2019年确诊为RA,开始接受JAKi(n=1827)、TNF抑制剂(TNFi,n=6422)、IL-6抑制剂(n=887)、阿帕赛普(n=1102)或利妥昔单抗(n=1149)治疗的患者,使用的数据来自多个相关联的瑞典国家登记册。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS;0-100 mm)评估疼痛从基线到3个月的变化差异,以及12个月时仍接受初始治疗且疼痛较轻(VAS疼痛<20)的患者比例,对不同治疗方法进行了比较。使用多变量线性回归评估了JAKis和bDMARDs治疗反应的比较,并对患者特征、合并症、当前联合用药和既往治疗进行了调整:4.0毫米;95%置信区间(CI)为1.6-6.3),与非TNFi bDMARDs相比,趋势相似。结论 JAKis与TNFis相比,在3个月和12个月时对疼痛结果的影响略好于TNFis,而在既往接受过≥2种bDMARDs治疗的患者中,两者之间的差异明显更大。JAKis对减轻疼痛的效果至少与非TNFi bDMARDs相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Arthritis & Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信