Different DNA Binding and Damage Mode between Anticancer Antibiotics Trioxacarcin A and LL-D49194α1

IF 8.5 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ruo-Qin Gao, Xiao-Dong Hu, Qiang Zhou, Xian-Feng Hou, Chunyang Cao* and Gong-Li Tang*, 
{"title":"Different DNA Binding and Damage Mode between Anticancer Antibiotics Trioxacarcin A and LL-D49194α1","authors":"Ruo-Qin Gao,&nbsp;Xiao-Dong Hu,&nbsp;Qiang Zhou,&nbsp;Xian-Feng Hou,&nbsp;Chunyang Cao* and Gong-Li Tang*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/jacsau.4c0061110.1021/jacsau.4c00611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Trioxacarcin A (TXN) is a highly potent cytotoxic antibiotic with remarkable structural complexity. The crystal structure of TXN bound to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) suggested that the TXN interaction might depend on positions of two sugar subunits on the minor and major grooves of dsDNA. LL-D49194α1 (LLD) is a TXN analogue bearing the same polycyclic polyketide scaffold with a distinct glycosylation pattern. Although LLD was in a phase I clinical trial, how LLD binds to dsDNA remains unclear. Here, we solved the solution structures at high resolutions of palindromic 2″-fluorine-labeled guanine-containing duplex d(A<sub>1</sub>A<sub>2</sub>C<sub>3</sub>C<sub>4</sub>G<sup>F</sup>G<sup>F</sup>T<sub>7</sub>T<sub>8</sub>)<sub>2</sub> and of its stable LLD and TXN covalently bound complexes. Combined with biochemical assays, we found that TXN-alkylated dsDNA would tend to keep DNA helix conformation, while LLD-alkylated dsDNA lost its stability more than TXN-alkylated dsDNA, leading to dsDNA denaturation. Thus, despite lower cytotoxicity in vitro, the differences of sugar substitutions in LLD caused greater DNA damage than TXN, thereby bringing about a completely new biological effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":94060,"journal":{"name":"JACS Au","volume":"4 9","pages":"3641–3648 3641–3648"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/jacsau.4c00611","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACS Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacsau.4c00611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trioxacarcin A (TXN) is a highly potent cytotoxic antibiotic with remarkable structural complexity. The crystal structure of TXN bound to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) suggested that the TXN interaction might depend on positions of two sugar subunits on the minor and major grooves of dsDNA. LL-D49194α1 (LLD) is a TXN analogue bearing the same polycyclic polyketide scaffold with a distinct glycosylation pattern. Although LLD was in a phase I clinical trial, how LLD binds to dsDNA remains unclear. Here, we solved the solution structures at high resolutions of palindromic 2″-fluorine-labeled guanine-containing duplex d(A1A2C3C4GFGFT7T8)2 and of its stable LLD and TXN covalently bound complexes. Combined with biochemical assays, we found that TXN-alkylated dsDNA would tend to keep DNA helix conformation, while LLD-alkylated dsDNA lost its stability more than TXN-alkylated dsDNA, leading to dsDNA denaturation. Thus, despite lower cytotoxicity in vitro, the differences of sugar substitutions in LLD caused greater DNA damage than TXN, thereby bringing about a completely new biological effect.

Abstract Image

抗癌抗生素 Trioxacarcin A 和 LL-D49194α1 的不同 DNA 结合和损伤模式
Trioxacarcin A(TXN)是一种强效细胞毒性抗生素,其结构非常复杂。TXN 与双链 DNA(dsDNA)结合的晶体结构表明,TXN 的相互作用可能取决于两个糖亚基在 dsDNA 小沟和大沟上的位置。LL-D49194α1(LLD)是一种TXN类似物,具有相同的多环多酮支架和独特的糖基化模式。虽然 LLD 已进入 I 期临床试验阶段,但 LLD 与 dsDNA 的结合方式仍不清楚。在这里,我们以高分辨率解决了2″-氟标记的含鸟嘌呤双链体d(A1A2C3C4GFGFT7T8)2及其稳定的LLD和TXN共价结合复合物的溶液结构。结合生化试验,我们发现 TXN 烷基化的 dsDNA 会倾向于保持 DNA 的螺旋构象,而 LLD 烷基化的 dsDNA 比 TXN 烷基化的 dsDNA 更容易失去稳定性,导致 dsDNA 变性。因此,尽管 LLD 在体外的细胞毒性较低,但其糖取代的差异比 TXN 造成了更大的 DNA 损伤,从而带来了全新的生物效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信