Artificial intelligence performance in testing microfluidics for point-of-care†

IF 6.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Lab on a Chip Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1039/D4LC00671B
Mert Tunca Doganay, Purbali Chakraborty, Sri Moukthika Bommakanti, Soujanya Jammalamadaka, Dheerendranath Battalapalli, Anant Madabhushi and Mohamed S. Draz
{"title":"Artificial intelligence performance in testing microfluidics for point-of-care†","authors":"Mert Tunca Doganay, Purbali Chakraborty, Sri Moukthika Bommakanti, Soujanya Jammalamadaka, Dheerendranath Battalapalli, Anant Madabhushi and Mohamed S. Draz","doi":"10.1039/D4LC00671B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing medicine by automating tasks like image segmentation and pattern recognition. These AI approaches support seamless integration with existing platforms, enhancing diagnostics, treatment, and patient care. While recent advancements have demonstrated AI superiority in advancing microfluidics for point of care (POC) diagnostics, a gap remains in comparative evaluations of AI algorithms in testing microfluidics. We conducted a comparative evaluation of AI models specifically for the two-class classification problem of identifying the presence or absence of bubbles in microfluidic channels under various imaging conditions. Using a model microfluidic system with a single channel loaded with 3D transparent objects (bubbles), we challenged each of the tested machine learning (ML) (<em>n</em> = 6) and deep learning (DL) (<em>n</em> = 9) models across different background settings. Evaluation revealed that the random forest ML model achieved 95.52% sensitivity, 82.57% specificity, and 97% AUC, outperforming other ML algorithms. Among DL models suitable for mobile integration, DenseNet169 demonstrated superior performance, achieving 92.63% sensitivity, 92.22% specificity, and 92% AUC. Remarkably, DenseNet169 integration into a mobile POC system demonstrated exceptional accuracy (&gt;0.84) in testing microfluidics at under challenging imaging settings. Our study confirms the transformative potential of AI in healthcare, emphasizing its capacity to revolutionize precision medicine through accurate and accessible diagnostics. The integration of AI into healthcare systems holds promise for enhancing patient outcomes and streamlining healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":85,"journal":{"name":"Lab on a Chip","volume":" 21","pages":" 4998-5008"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/lc/d4lc00671b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lab on a Chip","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/lc/d4lc00671b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing medicine by automating tasks like image segmentation and pattern recognition. These AI approaches support seamless integration with existing platforms, enhancing diagnostics, treatment, and patient care. While recent advancements have demonstrated AI superiority in advancing microfluidics for point of care (POC) diagnostics, a gap remains in comparative evaluations of AI algorithms in testing microfluidics. We conducted a comparative evaluation of AI models specifically for the two-class classification problem of identifying the presence or absence of bubbles in microfluidic channels under various imaging conditions. Using a model microfluidic system with a single channel loaded with 3D transparent objects (bubbles), we challenged each of the tested machine learning (ML) (n = 6) and deep learning (DL) (n = 9) models across different background settings. Evaluation revealed that the random forest ML model achieved 95.52% sensitivity, 82.57% specificity, and 97% AUC, outperforming other ML algorithms. Among DL models suitable for mobile integration, DenseNet169 demonstrated superior performance, achieving 92.63% sensitivity, 92.22% specificity, and 92% AUC. Remarkably, DenseNet169 integration into a mobile POC system demonstrated exceptional accuracy (>0.84) in testing microfluidics at under challenging imaging settings. Our study confirms the transformative potential of AI in healthcare, emphasizing its capacity to revolutionize precision medicine through accurate and accessible diagnostics. The integration of AI into healthcare systems holds promise for enhancing patient outcomes and streamlining healthcare delivery.

Abstract Image

人工智能在医疗点微流控测试中的表现
通过自动完成图像分割和模式识别等任务,人工智能(AI)正在彻底改变医学。这些人工智能方法支持与现有平台的无缝集成,增强了诊断、治疗和患者护理的能力。虽然最近的进步已经证明了人工智能在推动微流体技术用于医疗点诊断方面的优势,但在测试微流体技术的人工智能算法比较评估方面仍存在差距。我们对人工智能模型进行了比较评估,特别是针对在各种成像条件下识别微流体通道中是否存在气泡的两类分类问题。利用一个装有三维透明物体(气泡)的单通道模型微流控系统,我们在不同的背景设置下对每个测试过的机器学习(ML)(n = 6)和深度学习(DL)(n = 9)模型进行了挑战。评估结果显示,随机森林 ML 模型的灵敏度为 95.52%,特异度为 82.57%,AUC 为 97%,优于其他 ML 算法。在适用于移动集成的 DL 模型中,DenseNet169 表现出色,灵敏度达到 92.63%,特异度达到 92.22%,AUC 达到 92%。值得注意的是,DenseNet169 集成到移动 POC 系统后,在具有挑战性的成像环境下测试微流体时,表现出了极高的准确性(0.84)。我们的研究证实了人工智能在医疗保健领域的变革潜力,强调了其通过准确、便捷的诊断彻底改变精准医疗的能力。将人工智能融入医疗保健系统有望提高患者的治疗效果并简化医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lab on a Chip
Lab on a Chip 工程技术-化学综合
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
8.20%
发文量
434
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Lab on a Chip is the premiere journal that publishes cutting-edge research in the field of miniaturization. By their very nature, microfluidic/nanofluidic/miniaturized systems are at the intersection of disciplines, spanning fundamental research to high-end application, which is reflected by the broad readership of the journal. Lab on a Chip publishes two types of papers on original research: full-length research papers and communications. Papers should demonstrate innovations, which can come from technical advancements or applications addressing pressing needs in globally important areas. The journal also publishes Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信