Carbon sequestration through conservation tillage in sandy soils of arid and semi-arid climates: A meta-analysis

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
{"title":"Carbon sequestration through conservation tillage in sandy soils of arid and semi-arid climates: A meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This meta-analysis assessed soil organic carbon (SOC) percent changes in sandy soils, transitioning from conventional tillage (CT) to conservational tillage (CST) in arid and semi-arid climates. High levels of SOC in sandy soils are difficult to attain especially when precipitation levels are very low, contributing to low biomass production, and increased decomposition of organic matter. While CT practices are known to reduce SOC through the breakdown of soil aggregates, accelerated decomposition of soil organic matter, and promote erosion, CST methods (i.e., mulch tillage, no tillage, reduced tillage, ridge tillage, etc.) offer the potential to preserve soil aggregates and increase SOC concentration. Analyzing 55 peer-reviewed publications in arid and semi-arid climates with ≥ 45 % sand content, this study compared SOC content between CST and CT over short- and long-term periods (349 paired observations). Results showed that CST increased SOC in sandy soils, with an estimated 12.74 ± 1.46 % increase. Specifically, reduced tillage (RdT), mulch tillage (MchT), and no tillage (NT) exhibited the highest increases of SOC by 18.94 ± 2.48 %, 11.45 ± 2.46 %, and 10.06 ± 2.46 %, respectively, compared to CT. Studies with durations of up to 15 years (n = 297) showed a progressive increase in SOC concentrations under CST; however, the long-term stability of the accrued carbon content in sandy soils of arid and semi-arid climates is still uncertain, as studies extending beyond 15 years (n = 52) did not demonstrate significant changes in SOC levels. CST significantly raised SOC concentrations in precipitation up to 600 mm, though no significant changes were observed for precipitation over 600 mm. In soils with over 56 % sand content, CST increased SOC by approximately 13 %. This study highlights both positive and limited impacts of CST practices for soil conservation and climate change mitigation, emphasizing their significance for both existing agricultural areas in arid regions and those in parts of the world where aridity is on the rise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003118/pdfft?md5=0787681866a718869f30d2c85fd68c07&pid=1-s2.0-S0167198724003118-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003118","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis assessed soil organic carbon (SOC) percent changes in sandy soils, transitioning from conventional tillage (CT) to conservational tillage (CST) in arid and semi-arid climates. High levels of SOC in sandy soils are difficult to attain especially when precipitation levels are very low, contributing to low biomass production, and increased decomposition of organic matter. While CT practices are known to reduce SOC through the breakdown of soil aggregates, accelerated decomposition of soil organic matter, and promote erosion, CST methods (i.e., mulch tillage, no tillage, reduced tillage, ridge tillage, etc.) offer the potential to preserve soil aggregates and increase SOC concentration. Analyzing 55 peer-reviewed publications in arid and semi-arid climates with ≥ 45 % sand content, this study compared SOC content between CST and CT over short- and long-term periods (349 paired observations). Results showed that CST increased SOC in sandy soils, with an estimated 12.74 ± 1.46 % increase. Specifically, reduced tillage (RdT), mulch tillage (MchT), and no tillage (NT) exhibited the highest increases of SOC by 18.94 ± 2.48 %, 11.45 ± 2.46 %, and 10.06 ± 2.46 %, respectively, compared to CT. Studies with durations of up to 15 years (n = 297) showed a progressive increase in SOC concentrations under CST; however, the long-term stability of the accrued carbon content in sandy soils of arid and semi-arid climates is still uncertain, as studies extending beyond 15 years (n = 52) did not demonstrate significant changes in SOC levels. CST significantly raised SOC concentrations in precipitation up to 600 mm, though no significant changes were observed for precipitation over 600 mm. In soils with over 56 % sand content, CST increased SOC by approximately 13 %. This study highlights both positive and limited impacts of CST practices for soil conservation and climate change mitigation, emphasizing their significance for both existing agricultural areas in arid regions and those in parts of the world where aridity is on the rise.
通过保护性耕作在干旱和半干旱气候的沙质土壤中固碳:荟萃分析
这项荟萃分析评估了在干旱和半干旱气候条件下,从传统耕作(CT)过渡到保护性耕作(CST)的砂质土壤中土壤有机碳(SOC)百分比的变化。沙质土壤中的高浓度 SOC 难以达到,尤其是在降水量非常低的情况下,这会导致生物量产量低和有机物分解增加。众所周知,CT 方法会通过破坏土壤团聚体、加速土壤有机质分解和促进水土流失来减少 SOC,而 CST 方法(即覆盖耕作、免耕、减耕、脊耕等)则有可能保护土壤团聚体和增加 SOC 浓度。本研究分析了 55 篇在干旱和半干旱气候条件下发表的、含沙量≥ 45% 的同行评议论文,比较了 CST 和 CT 在短期和长期(349 次配对观测)内的 SOC 含量。结果表明,CST 增加了沙质土壤中的 SOC,估计增幅为 12.74 ± 1.46%。与 CT 相比,减少耕作 (RdT)、覆盖耕作 (MchT) 和不耕作 (NT) 的 SOC 增长率最高,分别为 18.94 ± 2.48 %、11.45 ± 2.46 % 和 10.06 ± 2.46 %。持续时间长达 15 年的研究(n = 297)表明,在 CST 条件下,SOC 浓度逐渐增加;然而,干旱和半干旱气候条件下砂质土壤中累积碳含量的长期稳定性仍不确定,因为持续时间超过 15 年的研究(n = 52)并未表明 SOC 水平发生了显著变化。在降水量不超过 600 毫米的土壤中,CST 能明显提高 SOC 含量,但超过 600 毫米的降水量则无明显变化。在含沙量超过 56% 的土壤中,CST 使 SOC 增加了约 13%。这项研究强调了 CST 实践对土壤保持和减缓气候变化的积极影响和有限影响,强调了其对干旱地区现有农业区和世界上干旱程度正在上升的地区的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信