Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.

IF 9.4 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Alexandra Witt,Wataru Toyokawa,Kevin N Lala,Wolfgang Gaissmaier,Charley M Wu
{"title":"Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.","authors":"Alexandra Witt,Wataru Toyokawa,Kevin N Lala,Wolfgang Gaissmaier,Charley M Wu","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2404928121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been much progress in understanding human social learning, including recent studies integrating social information into the reinforcement learning framework. Yet previous studies often assume identical payoffs between observer and demonstrator, overlooking the diversity of social information in real-world interactions. We address this gap by introducing a socially correlated bandit task that accommodates payoff differences among participants, allowing for the study of social learning under more realistic conditions. Our Social Generalization (SG) model, tested through evolutionary simulations and two online experiments, outperforms existing models by incorporating social information into the generalization process, but treating it as noisier than individual observations. Our findings suggest that human social learning is more flexible than previously believed, with the SG model indicating a potential resource-rational trade-off where social learning partially replaces individual exploration. This research highlights the flexibility of humans' social learning, allowing us to integrate social information from others with different preferences, skills, or goals.","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"119 1","pages":"e2404928121"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2404928121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been much progress in understanding human social learning, including recent studies integrating social information into the reinforcement learning framework. Yet previous studies often assume identical payoffs between observer and demonstrator, overlooking the diversity of social information in real-world interactions. We address this gap by introducing a socially correlated bandit task that accommodates payoff differences among participants, allowing for the study of social learning under more realistic conditions. Our Social Generalization (SG) model, tested through evolutionary simulations and two online experiments, outperforms existing models by incorporating social information into the generalization process, but treating it as noisier than individual observations. Our findings suggest that human social learning is more flexible than previously believed, with the SG model indicating a potential resource-rational trade-off where social learning partially replaces individual exploration. This research highlights the flexibility of humans' social learning, allowing us to integrate social information from others with different preferences, skills, or goals.
尽管奖励存在个体差异,人类仍能灵活整合社会信息。
在理解人类社会学习方面已经取得了很大进展,包括最近将社会信息纳入强化学习框架的研究。然而,以往的研究往往假定观察者和示范者之间的报酬是相同的,从而忽略了现实世界互动中社会信息的多样性。为了弥补这一不足,我们引入了一项社会相关的强盗任务,该任务考虑到了参与者之间的报酬差异,允许在更现实的条件下研究社会学习。我们的 "社会泛化(SG)"模型通过进化模拟和两个在线实验进行了测试,通过将社会信息纳入泛化过程,并将其视为比个体观察更嘈杂的信息,我们的模型优于现有模型。我们的研究结果表明,人类的社会学习比以前认为的更加灵活,SG 模型表明了一种潜在的资源-理性权衡,即社会学习部分取代了个体探索。这项研究强调了人类社会学习的灵活性,它使我们能够整合来自具有不同偏好、技能或目标的他人的社会信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信