“They don't trust me”: Service providers reflections of father-centric treatment and engagement

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Antonio Garcia, Rafael Pérez-Figueroa, David Cozart, Victoria Cook, Jeff Damron, Shelby Clark, Kendra Eubank
{"title":"“They don't trust me”: Service providers reflections of father-centric treatment and engagement","authors":"Antonio Garcia,&nbsp;Rafael Pérez-Figueroa,&nbsp;David Cozart,&nbsp;Victoria Cook,&nbsp;Jeff Damron,&nbsp;Shelby Clark,&nbsp;Kendra Eubank","doi":"10.1111/fare.13038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study sought to illuminate the barriers service providers experience in delivering healing services to enhance father and child well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Manifestations of structural barriers, such as racism, mother-centric practices, and disproportionate incarceration among Black and Brown fathers prevail. Little is known, however, about how providers describe barriers they encounter toward engaging fathers in services to equip them with the capacity to coparent effectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A convenience sample of providers (<i>n</i> = 24) representing a diverse array of child and family service systems responded to questions from a semistructured interview guide. Thematic analyses were conducted to describe how providers engage with fathers and their perceptions of barriers related to their ability to engage them in services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Findings revealed three types of barriers, each representing a separate theme: micro (biases, colorblindness), societal (devaluation of fathers' role), and systemic (racism, mother-centrism). Strategies to address barriers included implementing strengths-based practices, creating spaces to engage in reflexivity, and investing in father-centric programming. Most strategies involved modifying the micro context, conveying that future efforts should focus on developing procedures and policies that will enhance micro practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study captured the experiences of change agents and healers working with fathers and families. Their experiences illuminate obstacles they must contend with at the micro, societal, and systemic levels of practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Providers indicated that fathers will not benefit from services unless organizations embrace father-centric, strength-based healing practices and allocate space to engage in reflexivity about biases and the impact of systemic racism.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 4","pages":"2544-2563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study sought to illuminate the barriers service providers experience in delivering healing services to enhance father and child well-being.

Background

Manifestations of structural barriers, such as racism, mother-centric practices, and disproportionate incarceration among Black and Brown fathers prevail. Little is known, however, about how providers describe barriers they encounter toward engaging fathers in services to equip them with the capacity to coparent effectively.

Method

A convenience sample of providers (n = 24) representing a diverse array of child and family service systems responded to questions from a semistructured interview guide. Thematic analyses were conducted to describe how providers engage with fathers and their perceptions of barriers related to their ability to engage them in services.

Results

Findings revealed three types of barriers, each representing a separate theme: micro (biases, colorblindness), societal (devaluation of fathers' role), and systemic (racism, mother-centrism). Strategies to address barriers included implementing strengths-based practices, creating spaces to engage in reflexivity, and investing in father-centric programming. Most strategies involved modifying the micro context, conveying that future efforts should focus on developing procedures and policies that will enhance micro practices.

Conclusion

This study captured the experiences of change agents and healers working with fathers and families. Their experiences illuminate obstacles they must contend with at the micro, societal, and systemic levels of practice.

Implications

Providers indicated that fathers will not benefit from services unless organizations embrace father-centric, strength-based healing practices and allocate space to engage in reflexivity about biases and the impact of systemic racism.

"他们不信任我":服务提供者对以父亲为中心的治疗和参与的反思
本研究旨在揭示服务提供者在提供治疗服务以提高父亲和儿童福祉时遇到的障碍。 背景 普遍存在结构性障碍,如种族主义、以母亲为中心的做法,以及黑人和棕色人种父亲被监禁的比例过高。然而,对于服务提供者如何描述他们在让父亲参与服务,使他们具备有效地共同养育子女的能力时所遇到的障碍,却知之甚少。 方法 方便抽样调查了代表不同儿童和家庭服务系统的服务提供者(n = 24),他们回答了半结构化访谈指南中的问题。我们进行了主题分析,以描述服务提供者如何与父亲接触,以及他们对与父亲参与服务的能力有关的障碍的看法。 结果 研究结果显示了三种类型的障碍,每种障碍代表一个单独的主题:微观(偏见、肤色盲)、社会(贬低父亲的角色)和系统(种族主义、母亲中心主义)。解决障碍的策略包括实施基于优势的实践、创造参与反思的空间以及投资于以父亲为中心的计划。大多数策略都涉及到微观环境的改变,这表明未来的工作重点应该是制定能够加强微观实践的程序和政策。 结论 本研究记录了为父亲和家庭服务的变革推动者和治疗者的经验。他们的经历揭示了他们在微观、社会和系统层面的实践中必须面对的障碍。 启示 提供者指出,除非组织接受以父亲为中心、以力量为基础的治疗实践,并分配空间对偏见和系统性种族主义的影响进行反思,否则父亲们将无法从服务中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信