The war in Ukraine is changing plausible future socioeconomic scenarios leading to an unexplored outlook for biodiversity

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Claire Vincent, Andrea Cristiano, Ivon Cuadros-Casanova, Michela Pacifici, Carmen D. Soria, Lisa Tedeschi, Milena Beekmann, Alessandra D'alessio, Pablo M. Lucas, Dario Nania, Carlo Rondinini
{"title":"The war in Ukraine is changing plausible future socioeconomic scenarios leading to an unexplored outlook for biodiversity","authors":"Claire Vincent,&nbsp;Andrea Cristiano,&nbsp;Ivon Cuadros-Casanova,&nbsp;Michela Pacifici,&nbsp;Carmen D. Soria,&nbsp;Lisa Tedeschi,&nbsp;Milena Beekmann,&nbsp;Alessandra D'alessio,&nbsp;Pablo M. Lucas,&nbsp;Dario Nania,&nbsp;Carlo Rondinini","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shared socioeconomic pathways are a key tool in predicting biodiversity scenarios and in the subsequent design of environmental policies. Here, we discuss how recent policy changes to global trade routes, agriculture, and energy production in response to the war in Ukraine are impacting socioeconomic scenarios used to set and assess biodiversity targets. We also discuss how the disruption to the global geopolitical landscape provides a window of opportunity for policy reform and the radical societal paradigm shift that is needed to tackle the global biodiversity crisis. We call for the re-evaluation of biodiversity targets with newly developed scenarios that reflect the changes made to production and consumption patterns. We also recommend establishing national biodiversity working groups to screen proposed policies for their potential risks to the drivers of biodiversity change, since policy decisions made in response to the war that seemingly are far removed from the environment can have lasting impacts on nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared socioeconomic pathways are a key tool in predicting biodiversity scenarios and in the subsequent design of environmental policies. Here, we discuss how recent policy changes to global trade routes, agriculture, and energy production in response to the war in Ukraine are impacting socioeconomic scenarios used to set and assess biodiversity targets. We also discuss how the disruption to the global geopolitical landscape provides a window of opportunity for policy reform and the radical societal paradigm shift that is needed to tackle the global biodiversity crisis. We call for the re-evaluation of biodiversity targets with newly developed scenarios that reflect the changes made to production and consumption patterns. We also recommend establishing national biodiversity working groups to screen proposed policies for their potential risks to the drivers of biodiversity change, since policy decisions made in response to the war that seemingly are far removed from the environment can have lasting impacts on nature.

Abstract Image

乌克兰战争正在改变未来可能出现的社会经济状况,导致生物多样性的前景尚待探索
共同的社会经济路径是预测生物多样性情景和随后设计环境政策的关键工具。在此,我们将讨论最近为应对乌克兰战争而对全球贸易路线、农业和能源生产所做的政策改变如何影响用于设定和评估生物多样性目标的社会经济情景。我们还讨论了全球地缘政治格局的破坏如何为政策改革和彻底的社会模式转变提供了机会之窗,而这正是应对全球生物多样性危机所必需的。我们呼吁根据新制定的方案重新评估生物多样性目标,以反映生产和消费模式的变化。我们还建议成立国家生物多样性工作组,对拟议政策进行筛选,以确定其对生物多样性变化驱动因素的潜在风险,因为为应对看似远离环境的战争而做出的政策决定可能会对自然产生持久影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信