Sachin Chitalkar , Dipak Thakor , Ali Sheikhy , Jamie Cole , Sarah Fangmeyer , Fatemeh Nasri , Abdelmonem Ahmed , Ashkan Monfared , Md Reza Taheri
{"title":"Geniculate ganglion diverticulum: a potential imaging marker in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension","authors":"Sachin Chitalkar , Dipak Thakor , Ali Sheikhy , Jamie Cole , Sarah Fangmeyer , Fatemeh Nasri , Abdelmonem Ahmed , Ashkan Monfared , Md Reza Taheri","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is often challenging in patients who do not present with classic symptoms. Brain MRI can play a pivotal role, as several imaging findings, such as an empty sella appearance (ESA), have been shown to be associated with IIH. Yet, none of the MRI signs have been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that presence of a geniculate ganglion diverticulum (GGD) is a potential imaging marker for the detection of IIH.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This is an IRB-approved, single-institution, retrospective, observational study. Brain MRI examinations of patients referred to Radiology by Otology clinic over a period of 10 years were reviewed. 244 MRI exams fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were independently screened for the presence of GGD and ESA by two Neuroradiology fellows. Electronic medical records (EMR) of patients in this study were reviewed for presence of clinical manifestations of IIH. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to estimate the accuracy of each covariate in diagnosing IIH. The area under each ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to identify an accurate prognostic covariate. Statistical analysis was done using R programming language V 4.2.2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>GGD was identified in MRI exams of 51 patients. A 2:1 propensity score (PS) matching for age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI) was used to select non-GGD control group for comparison with the GGD group. There was strong agreement between the 2 reviewers (kappa = 0.81, agreement = 95 %). Twelve patients in this study were diagnosed with IIH. There was a high incidence of GGD (OR = 12.19, 95 % CI (2.56, 58.10)) and ESA (OR = 4.97, 95 % CI (1.47, 16.74)) in IIH patients. The AUC observed in GGD for predicting IIH was 0.771 (0.655–0.888), specificity = 0.709 (0.638–0.780), and sensitivity = 0.833 (0.583–1). The AUC observed for ESA in predicting IIH was 0.682 (0.532–0.831), specificity = 0.780 (0.709–0.844), and sensitivity = 0.583 (0.333–0.833).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>GGD is potentially a novel imaging marker of IIH with sensitivity higher than and specificity comparable to that of ESA.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance statement</h3><p>Presence of GGD should raise the possibility of IIH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 110278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is often challenging in patients who do not present with classic symptoms. Brain MRI can play a pivotal role, as several imaging findings, such as an empty sella appearance (ESA), have been shown to be associated with IIH. Yet, none of the MRI signs have been shown to have a high sensitivity and specificity. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that presence of a geniculate ganglion diverticulum (GGD) is a potential imaging marker for the detection of IIH.
Materials and methods
This is an IRB-approved, single-institution, retrospective, observational study. Brain MRI examinations of patients referred to Radiology by Otology clinic over a period of 10 years were reviewed. 244 MRI exams fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were independently screened for the presence of GGD and ESA by two Neuroradiology fellows. Electronic medical records (EMR) of patients in this study were reviewed for presence of clinical manifestations of IIH. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to estimate the accuracy of each covariate in diagnosing IIH. The area under each ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to identify an accurate prognostic covariate. Statistical analysis was done using R programming language V 4.2.2.
Results
GGD was identified in MRI exams of 51 patients. A 2:1 propensity score (PS) matching for age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI) was used to select non-GGD control group for comparison with the GGD group. There was strong agreement between the 2 reviewers (kappa = 0.81, agreement = 95 %). Twelve patients in this study were diagnosed with IIH. There was a high incidence of GGD (OR = 12.19, 95 % CI (2.56, 58.10)) and ESA (OR = 4.97, 95 % CI (1.47, 16.74)) in IIH patients. The AUC observed in GGD for predicting IIH was 0.771 (0.655–0.888), specificity = 0.709 (0.638–0.780), and sensitivity = 0.833 (0.583–1). The AUC observed for ESA in predicting IIH was 0.682 (0.532–0.831), specificity = 0.780 (0.709–0.844), and sensitivity = 0.583 (0.333–0.833).
Conclusion
GGD is potentially a novel imaging marker of IIH with sensitivity higher than and specificity comparable to that of ESA.
Clinical relevance statement
Presence of GGD should raise the possibility of IIH.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology