Dana Churbaji,Pascal Schlechter,Angela Nickerson,Nexhmedin Morina
{"title":"Emotion regulation profiles in Syrian refugees and migrants in Germany: self-efficacy, resilience and well-being comparisons.","authors":"Dana Churbaji,Pascal Schlechter,Angela Nickerson,Nexhmedin Morina","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nEmotion regulation (ER) plays a central role in psychopathology. Understanding person-centred patterns of ER strategies is crucial for prevention and intervention strategies. However, there is a paucity of research on ER profiles and their psychological correlates in forcibly displaced people (FDP).\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aimed to identify habitual ER profiles and to examine the predictive role of different psychological variables on these profiles in Syrian FDP in Germany.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nIn a sample of 991 individuals, we conducted a latent profile analysis (LPA) to assess habitual reappraisal and suppression of emotion as ER strategies, as well as self-efficacy, resilience, well-being comparisons, trauma exposure and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms as potential predictors of ER profile membership.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nLPA identified four distinct ER profiles: high regulators (12.8%), low regulators (20.6%), reappraisal regulators (25.1%) and suppressive regulators (41.5%). In multinomial regression analysis, self-efficacy, resilience, appetitive well-being comparisons and trauma exposure were significantly associated with profile membership, while PTSD and aversive well-being comparisons showed no significant association. High regulators exhibited the highest levels of self-efficacy, resilience and appetitive well-being comparisons, followed by reappraisal, suppressive and low regulators. Additionally, high regulators reported the highest number of traumatic events, followed by suppressive and low regulators.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur results indicate a higher adaptiveness in high regulation ER profiles as opposed to low regulation ER profiles.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\r\nGiven that most FDP in our sample relied predominantly on one ER strategy, developing interventions that focus on cultivating a broad repertoire of ER strategies may be beneficial.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Emotion regulation (ER) plays a central role in psychopathology. Understanding person-centred patterns of ER strategies is crucial for prevention and intervention strategies. However, there is a paucity of research on ER profiles and their psychological correlates in forcibly displaced people (FDP).
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to identify habitual ER profiles and to examine the predictive role of different psychological variables on these profiles in Syrian FDP in Germany.
METHOD
In a sample of 991 individuals, we conducted a latent profile analysis (LPA) to assess habitual reappraisal and suppression of emotion as ER strategies, as well as self-efficacy, resilience, well-being comparisons, trauma exposure and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms as potential predictors of ER profile membership.
RESULTS
LPA identified four distinct ER profiles: high regulators (12.8%), low regulators (20.6%), reappraisal regulators (25.1%) and suppressive regulators (41.5%). In multinomial regression analysis, self-efficacy, resilience, appetitive well-being comparisons and trauma exposure were significantly associated with profile membership, while PTSD and aversive well-being comparisons showed no significant association. High regulators exhibited the highest levels of self-efficacy, resilience and appetitive well-being comparisons, followed by reappraisal, suppressive and low regulators. Additionally, high regulators reported the highest number of traumatic events, followed by suppressive and low regulators.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate a higher adaptiveness in high regulation ER profiles as opposed to low regulation ER profiles.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Given that most FDP in our sample relied predominantly on one ER strategy, developing interventions that focus on cultivating a broad repertoire of ER strategies may be beneficial.
背景情绪调节(ER)在精神病理学中起着核心作用。了解以人为本的情绪调节策略模式对于预防和干预策略至关重要。本研究旨在确定德国境内叙利亚流离失所者的惯常情绪调节模式,并考察不同心理变量对这些模式的预测作用。方法 在991人的样本中,我们进行了潜在特征分析(LPA),以评估作为ER策略的习惯性重新评价和情绪抑制,以及作为ER特征潜在预测因素的自我效能、复原力、幸福感比较、创伤暴露和国际疾病分类第11修订版创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状。结果LPA确定了四种不同的ER特征:高调节者(12.8%)、低调节者(20.6%)、重新评估调节者(25.1%)和抑制调节者(41.5%)。在多项式回归分析中,自我效能感、复原力、开胃性幸福感比较和创伤暴露与特征成员身份有显著关联,而创伤后应激障碍和厌恶性幸福感比较则无显著关联。高调节者的自我效能感、复原力和开胃幸福感比较水平最高,其次是重新评价、压抑和低调节者。我们的研究结果表明,与低调节能力者相比,高调节能力者具有更高的适应能力。临床启示鉴于我们样本中的大多数 FDP 主要依赖于一种调节能力策略,因此制定侧重于培养广泛的调节能力策略的干预措施可能是有益的。