Lower limb coordination patterns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:A longitudinal study: Longitudinal lower limb coordination patterns following ACLR.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Cortney Armitano-Lago,Elizabeth Bjornsen,Caroline Lisee,Ashley Buck,Christin Büttner,Adam W Kiefer,Todd A Schwartz,Brian Pietrosimone
{"title":"Lower limb coordination patterns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:A longitudinal study: Longitudinal lower limb coordination patterns following ACLR.","authors":"Cortney Armitano-Lago,Elizabeth Bjornsen,Caroline Lisee,Ashley Buck,Christin Büttner,Adam W Kiefer,Todd A Schwartz,Brian Pietrosimone","doi":"10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nChanges in lower limb joint coordination have been shown to increase localized stress on knee joint soft tissue-a known precursor of osteoarthritis. While 50% of individuals who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) develop radiographic osteoarthritis, it is unclear how underlying joint coordination during gait changes post-ACLR. The purpose of this study was twofold: to determine differences in lower limb coordination patterns during gait in ACLR individuals 2, 4, and 6 months post-ACLR and to compare the coordination profiles of the ACLR participants at each timepoint post-ACLR to uninjured matched controls.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a longitudinal assessment to quantify lower limb coordination at 3 timepoints post-ACLR and compared the ACLR coordination profiles to uninjured controls. Thirty-four ACLR (age = 21.43 ± 4.24 years, mean ± SD; 70.59% female) and 34 controls (age = 21.42 ± 3.43 years; 70.59% female) participated. The ACLR group completed 3 overground gait assessments (2,4, and 6 months post-ACLR), and the controls completed 1 assessment, at which lower limb kinematics were collected. Cross-recurrence quantification analysis was used to characterize sagittal and frontal plane ankle-knee, ankle-hip, and knee-hip coordination dynamics. Comprehensive general linear mixed models were constructed to compare between-limb and within-limb coordination outcomes over time post-ACLR and a between-group comparison across timepoints.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe ACLR limb demonstrated a more \"stuck\" sagittal plane knee-hip coordination profile (greater trapping time (TT); p = 0.004) compared bilaterally. Between groups, the ACLR participants exhibited a more predictable ankle-knee coordination pattern (percent determinism (%DET); p < 0.05), stronger coupling between joints (meanline (MNLine)) across all segments (p < 0.05), and greater knee-hip TT (more \"stuck\"; p < 0.05) compared to the controls at each timepoint in the sagittal plane. Stronger frontal plane knee-hip joint coupling (MNLine) persisted across timepoints within the ACLR group compared to the controls (p < 0.05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe results indicate ACLR individuals exhibit a distinct and rigid coordination pattern during gait compared to controls within 6-month post-ACLR, which may have long-term implications for knee-joint health.","PeriodicalId":48897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"100988"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100988","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Changes in lower limb joint coordination have been shown to increase localized stress on knee joint soft tissue-a known precursor of osteoarthritis. While 50% of individuals who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) develop radiographic osteoarthritis, it is unclear how underlying joint coordination during gait changes post-ACLR. The purpose of this study was twofold: to determine differences in lower limb coordination patterns during gait in ACLR individuals 2, 4, and 6 months post-ACLR and to compare the coordination profiles of the ACLR participants at each timepoint post-ACLR to uninjured matched controls. METHODS We conducted a longitudinal assessment to quantify lower limb coordination at 3 timepoints post-ACLR and compared the ACLR coordination profiles to uninjured controls. Thirty-four ACLR (age = 21.43 ± 4.24 years, mean ± SD; 70.59% female) and 34 controls (age = 21.42 ± 3.43 years; 70.59% female) participated. The ACLR group completed 3 overground gait assessments (2,4, and 6 months post-ACLR), and the controls completed 1 assessment, at which lower limb kinematics were collected. Cross-recurrence quantification analysis was used to characterize sagittal and frontal plane ankle-knee, ankle-hip, and knee-hip coordination dynamics. Comprehensive general linear mixed models were constructed to compare between-limb and within-limb coordination outcomes over time post-ACLR and a between-group comparison across timepoints. RESULTS The ACLR limb demonstrated a more "stuck" sagittal plane knee-hip coordination profile (greater trapping time (TT); p = 0.004) compared bilaterally. Between groups, the ACLR participants exhibited a more predictable ankle-knee coordination pattern (percent determinism (%DET); p < 0.05), stronger coupling between joints (meanline (MNLine)) across all segments (p < 0.05), and greater knee-hip TT (more "stuck"; p < 0.05) compared to the controls at each timepoint in the sagittal plane. Stronger frontal plane knee-hip joint coupling (MNLine) persisted across timepoints within the ACLR group compared to the controls (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The results indicate ACLR individuals exhibit a distinct and rigid coordination pattern during gait compared to controls within 6-month post-ACLR, which may have long-term implications for knee-joint health.
前交叉韧带重建术后的下肢协调模式:纵向研究:前交叉韧带重建术后下肢协调模式的纵向研究。
背景下肢关节协调性的变化已被证明会增加膝关节软组织的局部应力--这是已知的骨关节炎的前兆。接受前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)的人中有 50%会发展成放射性骨关节炎,但目前还不清楚 ACLR 术后步态过程中潜在的关节协调性是如何变化的。本研究的目的有二:确定 ACLR 术后 2、4 和 6 个月时 ACLR 患者步态过程中下肢协调模式的差异,并将 ACLR 术后每个时间点的 ACLR 参与者的协调情况与未受伤的匹配对照组进行比较。34 名 ACLR(年龄 = 21.43 ± 4.24 岁,平均 ± SD;70.59% 为女性)和 34 名对照组(年龄 = 21.42 ± 3.43 岁;70.59% 为女性)参加了评估。ACLR 组完成了 3 次地面步态评估(ACLR 术后 2、4 和 6 个月),对照组完成了 1 次评估,并收集了下肢运动学数据。交叉复现量化分析用于描述矢状面和额面的踝-膝、踝-髋和膝-髋协调动态。结果:与双侧相比,前交叉韧带损伤肢体的矢状面膝髋关节协调状况更 "卡"(更长的困顿时间 (TT);P = 0.004)。在各组之间,与对照组相比,前交叉韧带重建肢体在矢状面的每个时间点都表现出更可预测的踝-膝协调模式(确定性百分比 (%DET);p < 0.05)、更强的所有节段关节间耦合(平均线 (MNLine))(p < 0.05)和更大的膝-髋 TT(更 "卡";p < 0.05)。结果表明,与对照组相比,前交叉韧带损伤后 6 个月内的前交叉韧带损伤患者在步态过程中表现出独特而僵硬的协调模式,这可能会对膝关节健康产生长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS) is an international, multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance the fields of sport, exercise, physical activity, and health sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport, JSHS is dedicated to promoting original and impactful research, as well as topical reviews, editorials, opinions, and commentary papers. With a focus on physical and mental health, injury and disease prevention, traditional Chinese exercise, and human performance, JSHS offers a platform for scholars and researchers to share their findings and contribute to the advancement of these fields. Our journal is peer-reviewed, ensuring that all published works meet the highest academic standards. Supported by a carefully selected international editorial board, JSHS upholds impeccable integrity and provides an efficient publication platform. We invite submissions from scholars and researchers worldwide, and we are committed to disseminating insightful and influential research in the field of sport and health science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信