Succession in abandoned fields: Chronosequence data verified by monitoring of semi-permanent plots

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Klára Řehounková, Lubomír Tichý, Karel Prach
{"title":"Succession in abandoned fields: Chronosequence data verified by monitoring of semi-permanent plots","authors":"Klára Řehounková,&nbsp;Lubomír Tichý,&nbsp;Karel Prach","doi":"10.1111/jvs.13303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>Is there a similarity between successional patterns in abandoned fields identified (a) through analysis of differently aged sites examined at one point in time (chronosequence) and (b) those derived from a limited set of semi-permanent plots? What is the rate of succession on dry and mesic abandoned fields and how is the participation of different functional groups changing during succession?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Bohemian Karst, the Czech Republic, Europe.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study utilises data collected from dry and mesic abandoned fields between 1975 and 2019. A data set of 129 chronosequence vegetation samples (54 dry and 75 mesic plots) and 26 samples from six semi-permanent plots (11 dry and 15 mesic) with different repetitions were analysed. Plot age (since abandonment) varied from 1 to 91 years for chronosequences and up to 99 years for semi-permanent data. Moreover, we compared the rate of succession between dry and mesic series using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. We used a generalised linear mixed model to study the relationship between the cover of different functional groups and the age of abandoned fields.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The successional patterns observed on abandoned fields were consistent between the chronosequence and semi-permanent plots. Both on dry and mesic fields, the early stages of succession transitioned from open annual to perennial herbal vegetation. In mesic fields, the succession led to woodland stands within approximately 25–30 years. Conversely, succession slowed down in dry fields and has persisted for several decades in a stage dominated mostly by perennial graminoids accompanied by scattered shrubs and trees. The trends detected with the chronosequence approach for the different functional groups corresponded to those found in semi-permanent dry and mesic series plots.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The plots using a chronosequence approach can reliably reveal general successional patterns comparable to those obtained from semi-permanent plots. Observing a higher number of plots at one time may better illustrate the variability of succession at the landscape scale than a detailed, long-lasting study of a low number of semi-permanent plots. In the studied area, the dry abandoned fields host a long-persisting non-forest state of succession under the current climatic conditions, while succession in mesic abandoned fields continues further towards woodland.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"35 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvs.13303","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions

Is there a similarity between successional patterns in abandoned fields identified (a) through analysis of differently aged sites examined at one point in time (chronosequence) and (b) those derived from a limited set of semi-permanent plots? What is the rate of succession on dry and mesic abandoned fields and how is the participation of different functional groups changing during succession?

Location

Bohemian Karst, the Czech Republic, Europe.

Methods

This study utilises data collected from dry and mesic abandoned fields between 1975 and 2019. A data set of 129 chronosequence vegetation samples (54 dry and 75 mesic plots) and 26 samples from six semi-permanent plots (11 dry and 15 mesic) with different repetitions were analysed. Plot age (since abandonment) varied from 1 to 91 years for chronosequences and up to 99 years for semi-permanent data. Moreover, we compared the rate of succession between dry and mesic series using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. We used a generalised linear mixed model to study the relationship between the cover of different functional groups and the age of abandoned fields.

Results

The successional patterns observed on abandoned fields were consistent between the chronosequence and semi-permanent plots. Both on dry and mesic fields, the early stages of succession transitioned from open annual to perennial herbal vegetation. In mesic fields, the succession led to woodland stands within approximately 25–30 years. Conversely, succession slowed down in dry fields and has persisted for several decades in a stage dominated mostly by perennial graminoids accompanied by scattered shrubs and trees. The trends detected with the chronosequence approach for the different functional groups corresponded to those found in semi-permanent dry and mesic series plots.

Conclusions

The plots using a chronosequence approach can reliably reveal general successional patterns comparable to those obtained from semi-permanent plots. Observing a higher number of plots at one time may better illustrate the variability of succession at the landscape scale than a detailed, long-lasting study of a low number of semi-permanent plots. In the studied area, the dry abandoned fields host a long-persisting non-forest state of succession under the current climatic conditions, while succession in mesic abandoned fields continues further towards woodland.

Abstract Image

废弃田地的演替:通过监测半永久性地块验证时序数据
问题 在(a)通过分析在一个时间点上考察的不同年龄的地点(时间序列)和(b)从一组有限的半永久性地块中发现的废弃田地的演替模式之间是否存在相似性?干燥和中性废弃田地的演替速度如何,演替过程中不同功能群的参与情况如何变化? 地点 波希米亚喀斯特,捷克共和国,欧洲。 方法 本研究利用 1975 年至 2019 年期间从干地和中生荒地收集的数据。研究分析了一组包含 129 个时序植被样本(54 个干旱地块和 75 个中生地块)的数据,以及来自 6 个半永久性地块(11 个干旱地块和 15 个中生地块)的 26 个不同重复的样本。年代序列的地块年龄(自废弃以来)从 1 年到 91 年不等,半永久性数据的地块年龄则长达 99 年。此外,我们还利用布雷-柯蒂斯异质性比较了干旱系列和中生系列之间的演替率。我们使用广义线性混合模型研究了不同功能群覆盖率与废弃田地年龄之间的关系。 结果 在废弃田块上观察到的演替模式在年代序列和半永久性地块上是一致的。无论是在干旱田地还是中耕田地,演替的早期阶段都是从开放的一年生植被过渡到多年生草本植被。在中生性田地上,大约 25-30 年的演替就会形成林地。相反,旱地的演替速度减慢,几十年来一直处于主要以多年生禾本科植物为主,伴有零星灌木和乔木的阶段。采用时序法发现的不同功能群的演替趋势与半永久性干旱和中生系列地块的演替趋势一致。 结论 采用时序法的地块可以可靠地揭示一般的演替模式,与半永久性地块的演替模式相当。与对数量较少的半永久性地块进行详细、持久的研究相比,在同一时间观察数量较多的地块可能更能说明地貌尺度上演替的变异性。在所研究的地区,干燥的废弃田地在当前气候条件下长期处于非林地演替状态,而中风废弃田地的演替则进一步向林地演替。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信